Arbeit macht frei: - Fredrick Töben

not published criticisms of the judgment against the Adelaide Institute
website but in-depth presentations for and against the position by
Frederick Toben and others like him.’ In other words, just to defend his
right to speak without dealing directly with the content of his speech is a
cop-out. So, was there a program of mass extermination of Jews and
others in which gas was used? The answer is an unequivocal yes.
How do we know? Because, amongst others, we have the testimony of
Rudolph Hoess, the commandant of Auschwitz. In his deposition to the
Nuremberg court Hoess says that in 1941 his executioners were being
overwhelmed by the sheer numbers of Russian prisoners sent to him to be
murdered. Shooting was inefficient.
Hoess knew that gas was being used at Treblinka to kill Warsaw Jews, so
he went to inspect. He found gas was, indeed, a more efficient method of
mass-producing death, but he was not impressed with the carbon
monoxide that was being used. It was too slow.
At Auschwitz he began his first experiments with Zyklon B, a form of
crystallised hydrocyanic acid. The first experiments were crude, and
involved herding prisoners into a room and throwing in a Zyklon B
cylinder and slamming the door. Guards and witnesses wore gas masks.
Later, when Jews started arriving in huge transports, larger rooms were
pressed into service and some improvements were made to the delivery of
the gas through holes in the ceiling. Hoess describes murdering Jews in a
chamber that held 2000 people - every day, even on Christmas Day.
As the Allies approached, efforts were made to eradicate the evidence of
mass murder. To go looking for ‘gas chambers’ now - as though they were
some sort of large-scale equivalent of the American execution chambers -
is ridiculous. As is the suggestion by the historical revisionists that
autopsies should have been carried out at Auschwitz,
Treblinka and Majdanek to determine if the corpses carried signs of gas.
Autopsies in the charnel house of 1945 Europe?
Revisionists go to absurd lengths to discredit Hoess’ evidence, proposing
that it was beaten out of him. Hoess was tried at Nuremberg and again in
Poland and was executed at Auschwitz in 1947.
If Toben were given space here to put his case he would be aggravating his
offence and The Sunday Age would be breaching anti-discrimination laws.
That is outrageous. The tranquillity of society is not disturbed by
argument, but rather by the silencing of those who hold improper
opinions.
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/09/21/1032054997894.html
The originator of the legal battle, Jeremy Jones, gloats about my 1999
German arrest and he ultimately wins the case against me because he did
19