Arbeit macht frei: - Fredrick Töben

y the ‘Holocaust-Shoah’ narrative? What about 70 per cent of
Australians of Anglo-Saxon-Celtic origin who are ceaselessly vilified by all
sorts of minority groups?
27. #12: Again, the hypocrisy of it all speaks for itself. My ‘individual
merit’ has been disregarded outright – but then I forget, anyone in our
society can get legal aid for whatever matter in order to get justice before
our courts, except those labelled by Jews as ‘hater’, ‘Holocaust denier’,
‘antisemite’, ‘racist’, ‘Nazi’, et al. Such vilification is now legally statesanctioned,
all because the ‘Holocaust-Shoah’ narrative needs to be
protected. Since when has an historical truth needed protection, alone
legal protection? Of course, the well-spring of this hatred is never looked
at – read the Babylonian Talmud.
28. #13: The RDA does nothing of the sort, and it’s suspension in the
Northern Territory to get problems resolved within Aboriginal
communities reflects the legal fact that the RDA has serious flaws,
certainly if we in Australia wish to live in a robust democracy where the
plurality of opinions and voluntarism are cornerstones of our justice
system – and where truth-telling remains a virtue and lying is a vice.
29. #14: This guff from Lewis/Wertheim about my work not being ‘in
good faith as part of a genuine academic, artistic or scientific debate’
speaks for itself. These terms were never defined at the HREOC stage
where Commissioner Kath McEvoy – and still law lecturer at The
University of Adelaide – overrode all my protestations and material that
went towards establishing the matters of fact of this case. She was even
secretly involved with a process that led to the University of Canterbury,
Christchurch, New Zealand, to initiate an enquiry into the Hayward
Thesis, a copy of which I submitted to HREOC in defence of my
legitimately producing material of an academic nature. With some
satisfaction I note that Sir Karl Popper taught at Canterbury University just
after the war and that I in 1976 I completed my thesis on his theory
falsification principles. I need not mention, but will do so, that in 2006 I
also enrolled in law at The University of Adelaide and actually failed Kath
McEvoy’s subject by 4 marks!
30. #15: Typical of the Marxist agitation propagandist, both Lewis and
Wertheim reduce my motivation for enquiring into historical events as a
mere quest for publicity. Such a comment reflects the poverty of their
personal value system. I would have thought by the time a person matures
it is a far deeper and more serious impulse that propels me, rather than
the typical Hollywood-type of fantasies, namely a search for truth in
history. Even now at 65 years of age and having survived my fifth prison
stint, I view such a comment from Lewis/Wertheim as self-serving,
perhaps reflecting upon their own shallow self-reflective powers and lack
193