Arbeit macht frei: - Fredrick Töben

court acted as a proxy for Australia’s Zionist Jews. Lewis and Wertheim
can now claim the matter has become a contempt of court matter, which is
now a new fact. The matters of fact of the Holocaust are now legally
protected from any further public debate, except where officially
sanctioned. Note the parallel that exists between Prof Ian Plimer now
being labelled a ‘climate change denier’. The same totalitarian mindset
operates in this field as it does in Holocaust narratives that aim to protect
interpretive orthodoxy – and that is totally unscientific because science
teaches us that in the physical world there are no absolutes – only that
which we create in our own minds is absolute, this being the essence of
our belief system.
14. There were two apologies:
a. In November 2007 I indeed apologized to the court and removed all
so-called offensive material, except a link to the Wayback Machine, which
was not part of the agreement that gave rise to the apology. In a headline
the Australian Jewish News gloated about my giving a ‘Holocaust denial’
apology, again a typical way of discrediting me. How could I ever change
my views and opinions, if I have not received information on which to
base such a change? The headline spelled out I had re-canted as did
David Irving in 2005 in Vienna in the hope of getting a lighter prison
sentence, which did not happen.
b. When I realized the trick involved in that written apology of November
2007, I publicly withdrew from it, but did not re-upload the removed
material. I again submitted a written apology in April/May this year, which
the court rejected, and which I now formally also withdraw. Jewish media
reports indicated it was not enough of an apology, but as far as I was
concerned it was a sincere apology to the court in the light of the Bishop
Williamson apology made to the Pope earlier this year. I apologised to the
court for upsetting it by my matter reaching it. Of course, such an apology
does not contain a re-canting of my beliefs/opinions about matters
‘Holocaust-Shoah’. To date Common Law does not criminalise firmly
and sincerely-held opinions and beliefs.
15. #6: I published material, most of which I did not author because
Revisionism is an international, multi-racial movement. In fact, anyone
who thinks independently is a Revisionist because as new information
becomes available, an active mind absorbes it and adapts. Hence the
totalitarian mind’s fear of the Internet, which has become our weapon of
mass instruction.
16. It is a problem for me to tell the truth and to obey the law, and simply
to obey absurd court orders is an insult for anyone who still nurtures some
sense of justice. Wertheim and Lewis make fools of themselves by
suggesting there is no evidence of bias in our FCA judges. The prime
190