Arbeit macht frei: - Fredrick Töben

MR PERKINS: No, and
SPENDER J: There is nothing that you are aware of which permits us to
do that?
MR PERKINS: I think those are my submissions, if the court pleases.
SPENDER J: Very well. Mr Margo?
MR MARGO: I don’t know if your Honours would be assisted by any
further submissions on the evidence that there is of enmity. I think
Gilmour J
SPENDER J: It’s a matter for you to rob your own stage coach
MR MARGO: I’m sorry, your Honour?
GILMOUR J: Well, I raised it, Mr Margo, and I’m satisfied that it’s not a
matter that was weighed by his Honour in sentencing Dr Toben.
MR MARGO: On the Wayback machine, your Honours, I just mention
that at page 2083, this is ground 5 that my learned friend addressed, is a
cross-examination about that and what it showed was that Dr Toben went
searching for this document on the World Wide Web and when he
found it he put links to it. Ground 9 on the distinct – the orders make no
distinction between publication of material of which Dr Toben is the
author and material from other sources. May I take your Honours to page
1156 of the appeal book; this is a document to which Dr Toben, in his
capacity as editor, made available through the website. It was seen there by
Mr Jones on 24 April 2008. It’s not the subject of a charge, but it’s part of
what the material his Honour had before him when he considered
contumacious and defiance
SPENDER J: What page number again, please?
MR MARGO: 1156. And for the affidavit referring to this material it’s
paragraph 12 at page 930 if your Honours need to go there. All it says is
that Mr Jones saw this on the website on 24 April 2008 and the day –
shortly before – there had been a directions hearing before the court and
Mr Jones has referred to the reference to world wide conspiracy against
Frederick Toben, the Australian High Council of Jury and their revered
leader with a picture of Mr Jones at 1157. The lawyer demands that
Toben be imprisoned and at the bottom of page 1157 in a document
lodged with the court was part of a plan to – and then a quote from Dr
Toben which came from a written submission he had put on the web:
This matter before the Federal Court of Australia is a Jewish
conspiratorial matter designed to protect an historical lie.
It’s said elsewhere: There’s plenty of material that the Federal Court is
being used as a proxy by Designer Racists. Lower on page 1158 he
questions the Jewishness of the court and a quote again from his
submission – he seemed to think that Rothman J was a judge of this court:
Both judges give rise for concern that any kind of justice can emerge from
proceedings that impact on a contentious interpretation of historical event.
121