19.06.2013 Views

Effects of fruit position on fruit mass and seed germination in the ...

Effects of fruit position on fruit mass and seed germination in the ...

Effects of fruit position on fruit mass and seed germination in the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

dark c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s mimicked closely <strong>the</strong> natural situati<strong>on</strong> under<br />

<strong>the</strong> soil surface dur<strong>in</strong>g spr<strong>in</strong>g. The high percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong><br />

recorded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> laboratory corresp<strong>on</strong>ds with that<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a comm<strong>on</strong> garden burial experiment, where 90%<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>seed</strong>s stored <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> soil germ<strong>in</strong>ated over <strong>the</strong> first w<strong>in</strong>ter (L.<br />

Moravcová et al., unpublished data).<br />

4.2. Fruit <strong>mass</strong> <strong>and</strong> germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> characteristics:<br />

<strong>the</strong> limited effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> umbel type, <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>positi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>traspecific variati<strong>on</strong><br />

The mean <strong>mass</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> (13.1 mg) recorded <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> present<br />

study is with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> range given by Tiley et al. (1996) for this<br />

species (4.6–23.2 mg) <strong>and</strong> Šerá (2003) gives a mean value <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

7.43 mg for <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> H. mantegazzianum dried at 80 °C.<br />

More importantly, <strong>the</strong> present study <strong>in</strong>dicates that <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>mass</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> Apiaceae cannot be directly compared without know<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>positi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> a plant. Fruit from term<strong>in</strong>al <str<strong>on</strong>g>positi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>s<br />

weighed an average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 16.2 mg, while <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> from satellite<br />

<strong>and</strong> branch <str<strong>on</strong>g>positi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>s was smaller (11.7 mg). Fruit from<br />

<strong>the</strong> centre <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> umbels (13.1 mg) was significantly heavier than<br />

that from <strong>the</strong> marg<strong>in</strong>s (12.7 mg). O<strong>the</strong>r published studies<br />

report even greater variati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>mass</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> produced <strong>on</strong><br />

different umbels <strong>in</strong>Apiaceae.A six-fold variati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>mass</strong><br />

is reported for P. sativa, when <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> from <strong>the</strong> tertiary umbels<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a small plant is compared with that from primary umbels<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a large plant (Hendrix, 1984a; see also Thomps<strong>on</strong>, 1984;<br />

Hendrix, 1984b for o<strong>the</strong>r species). Hendrix <strong>and</strong> Sun (1989)<br />

reported a three- to 16-fold variati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> seven species, <strong>and</strong><br />

c<strong>on</strong>cluded that <strong>in</strong>traspecific variati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>mass</strong> is <strong>the</strong> rule<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> excepti<strong>on</strong> due to <strong>the</strong> effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> developmental<br />

factors such as <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> number, time <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> flower<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> locati<strong>on</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>florescences. However, <strong>the</strong>se factors may not affect <strong>the</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>mass</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same way, which makes it difficult to assign<br />

causality to with<strong>in</strong> plant variati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>mass</strong>. The smaller<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> produced by <strong>the</strong> last umbels formed later <strong>in</strong> a seas<strong>on</strong><br />

may suffer from a lower availability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> reserves as suggested<br />

by Hendrix (1984a,1984b) for P. sativa <strong>and</strong> Heracleum lanatum.<br />

Obviously, this is less important <strong>in</strong> H. mantegazzianum.<br />

Percentage germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> was not affected by <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>positi<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> H. mantegazzianum mo<strong>the</strong>r plant but germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong><br />

rate was. Large <strong>seed</strong> germ<strong>in</strong>ated faster than small<br />

<strong>seed</strong>, but <strong>the</strong> difference was <strong>on</strong>ly obvious <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early weeks<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> experiment. In a number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> species, lower percentages<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> small <strong>seed</strong>s germ<strong>in</strong>ate than <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> large <strong>seed</strong>s (Ojala, 1985;<br />

Hendrix <strong>and</strong> Sun, 1989; Hendrix <strong>and</strong> Trapp, 1992), but <strong>the</strong><br />

opposite relati<strong>on</strong>ship has also been reported (see Thomas et<br />

al., 1979 study <strong>on</strong> A. graveolens). A detailed study <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Hendrix<br />

(1984a) <strong>on</strong> P. sativa revealed <strong>the</strong> importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tim<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>seed</strong> germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>. The proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> germ<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g <strong>seed</strong> did<br />

not differ <strong>in</strong> autumn (i.e., without stratificati<strong>on</strong>), whereas <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g a greater percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> big <strong>seed</strong> germ<strong>in</strong>ate than<br />

small (Hendrix, 1984a).<br />

There is little published <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> rate<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> species <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Apiaceae. A pattern opposite to that found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

present study is reported for P. sativa, where small <strong>seed</strong> ger-<br />

L. Moravcová et al. / Acta Oecologica 28 (2005) 1–10<br />

m<strong>in</strong>ated more rapidly than large <strong>seed</strong> (Hendrix, 1984a). However,<br />

this was <strong>on</strong>ly true <strong>in</strong> autumn <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re was no difference<br />

<strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g. These results suggest that small <strong>seed</strong>s may<br />

have a competitive advantage over large <strong>seed</strong>s <strong>in</strong> autumn due<br />

to faster germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>, but are at a disadvantage <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> lower percentage germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>. As most germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> field occurs <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g, populati<strong>on</strong> recruitment from<br />

small <strong>seed</strong>s is likely to be substantially less than that from<br />

large <strong>seed</strong>s (Hendrix, 1984a).<br />

In our study area, H. mantegazzianum germ<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>in</strong><br />

spr<strong>in</strong>g (no <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>gs were observed <strong>in</strong> study plots <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

autumn). For that reas<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> experiment was<br />

designed to mimic <strong>the</strong> temperature <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g; under such c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

large <strong>seed</strong>s germ<strong>in</strong>ate faster than small <strong>seed</strong>s. As large<br />

<strong>seed</strong>s also produce bigger <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>gs (Harper, 1977; Thomas,<br />

1996; Thomas et al., 1979), which provide <strong>the</strong>m with a competitive<br />

advantage over <strong>seed</strong>l<strong>in</strong>gs produced by small <strong>seed</strong>,<br />

<strong>the</strong>se results suggest that little c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> small <strong>seed</strong>s to<br />

populati<strong>on</strong> recruitment can be expected <strong>in</strong> H. mantegazzianum.<br />

4.3. Effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> plant characteristics <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>mass</strong><br />

Plant size, expressed as height <strong>and</strong> basal diameter, had no<br />

effect <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> H. mantegazzianum <strong>seed</strong> that germ<strong>in</strong>ated;<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>mass</strong> was affected. Relati<strong>on</strong>ships between<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>mass</strong> <strong>and</strong> characteristics related to plant vigour, as found<br />

at some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> sites, <strong>in</strong>dicate a trade-<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>f between allocati<strong>on</strong> to<br />

vegetative growth <strong>and</strong> generative reproducti<strong>on</strong> (Harper, 1977).<br />

The negative effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> height <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>mass</strong>, found at three<br />

study sites, reflects a trade-<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>f <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> allocati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> resources<br />

to competiti<strong>on</strong> for light <strong>and</strong> reproducti<strong>on</strong>. In H. mantegazzianum,<br />

however, small <strong>seed</strong> is not at a major disadvantage<br />

as it achieves similarly high germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> percentages as large<br />

<strong>seed</strong>.<br />

The basal diameter <strong>in</strong> H. mantegazzianum is closely associated<br />

with plant vigour <strong>and</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> producti<strong>on</strong> significantly<br />

depends <strong>on</strong> this characteristic (Pyšek et al., 1995). At <strong>on</strong>e<br />

site, <strong>the</strong> most vigorous plants produced <strong>the</strong> heaviest <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g>, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that <strong>the</strong> best perform<strong>in</strong>g plants are not <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>the</strong> most<br />

fecund (Pyšek et al., 1995) but also produce high quality <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />

That <strong>the</strong> more vigorous plants produce <strong>the</strong> heavier <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g> is<br />

also <strong>in</strong>dicated by <strong>the</strong> positive effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> umbel size <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>fruit</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>mass</strong>.<br />

The absence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a significant relati<strong>on</strong>ship at most <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong><br />

study sites might be partly due to small sample size (n =8)<br />

<strong>and</strong> high variati<strong>on</strong>. For technical reas<strong>on</strong>s, it was not possible<br />

to <strong>in</strong>clude more plants per study site hence <strong>the</strong> result<strong>in</strong>g power<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> tests was ra<strong>the</strong>r low. For that reas<strong>on</strong>, any c<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong><br />

about <strong>the</strong> effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> plant vigour <strong>on</strong> germ<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> H. mantegazzianum<br />

must be treated with cauti<strong>on</strong>. While studies <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong><br />

correlati<strong>on</strong> between plant size <strong>and</strong> fecundity, expressed as<br />

<strong>seed</strong> number or <strong>seed</strong> <strong>mass</strong>, c<strong>on</strong>sistently reveal a positive relati<strong>on</strong>ship<br />

(Hendrix <strong>and</strong> Sun, 1989 for seven species <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Apiaceae),<br />

those attempt<strong>in</strong>g to relate plant size <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

<strong>seed</strong> <strong>mass</strong> are less successful. In <strong>the</strong> same study, Hendrix <strong>and</strong><br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!