FEIS - Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
FEIS - Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
FEIS - Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON THE DEIS<br />
B o u l d e r B a y C o m m u n i t y E n h a n c e m e n t P r o g r a m P r o j e c t E I S<br />
Comment 17-c: Comment Summary – DEIS does not quantify the reduction in sediment and compare<br />
by Alternatives and different treatment scenarios. Must differentiate between TSS<br />
and fine sediments.<br />
Speaker 18 – Dave Ferrari<br />
Please refer to Master Response 1.<br />
Comment 18-a: Comment Summary – Supports the project.<br />
Comment noted.<br />
Speaker 19 – Jason Paeda<br />
Comment 19-a: Comment Summary – Lives above the project. Does not support the proposed height<br />
of the development.<br />
This is not a comment on the content or adequacy of the DEIS. This information is<br />
passed on to the Project proponent and decision maker(s) for consideration. No<br />
further response to this comment in relation to the DEIS is warranted.<br />
Comment 19-b: Comment Summary – DEIS does not analyze the project in relationship to adjacent<br />
homes. Project will block views of Lake <strong>Tahoe</strong> from his home.<br />
Please see responses to comments 117-a, 122-a, 286-a, 322-fm and 322-it.<br />
Comment 19-c: Comment Summary – Construction noise will impact adjacent homes.<br />
Please see responses to comments 93-w, 93-x and 332-aq.<br />
Comment 19-d: Comment Summary – Uphold the settlement agreement.<br />
Speaker 20 – Paul Reynolds<br />
The existing Mariner Settlement Agreement is not a TRPA <strong>Regional</strong> Plan document.<br />
Therefore, the settlement agreement is not a threshold for determining impacts for<br />
TRPA and is not a TRPA planning document that defines allowable land uses.<br />
Changes to the settlement agreement occur separately from, but in conjunction with,<br />
the EIS process.<br />
Comment 20-a: Comment Summary – Neighbor who lives above the project. Supports the project.<br />
Comment noted.<br />
Speaker 21 – Coral Amendi<br />
Comment 21-a: Comment Summary – Against the project scale. No buffering between residential<br />
uses to the west. Should be sidewalks on Wellness Way to get up the hill.<br />
Please see responses to comments 322-bm and 322-hd, which address buffering, and<br />
responses to comments 93-r, 322-cm, 322-cu, 322-fs and 322-fv, which address<br />
sidewalks.<br />
Comment 21-b: Comment Summary – Environmental impact will occur with the project (e.g., tree<br />
removal, wildlife, etc.).<br />
Environmental impacts for each Alternative are analyzed in Chapter 4 of the DEIS<br />
and mitigation measures are proposed, as feasible, where significant impacts may<br />
occur. Impacts to biological resources are analyzed in Chapter 4.04. Mitigation<br />
SEPTEMBER 8 , 2010 HAUGE BRUECK ASSOCIATES PAGE 8- 181
Change language