FEIS - Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
FEIS - Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
FEIS - Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS ON THE DEIS<br />
B o u l d e r B a y C o m m u n i t y E n h a n c e m e n t P r o g r a m P r o j e c t E I S<br />
This is not a comment on the content or adequacy of the DEIS. This information is<br />
passed on to the Project proponent and decision maker(s) for consideration. No<br />
further response to this comment in relation to the DEIS is warranted.<br />
Comment 11-b: Comment Summary – The rules should apply to every project the same. Should not<br />
amend the Code for a project.<br />
This is not a comment on the content or adequacy of the DEIS. This information is<br />
passed on to the Project proponent and decision maker(s) for consideration. No<br />
further response to this comment in relation to the DEIS is warranted.<br />
Comment 11-c: Comment Summary – Water quality and sediment - Should have already required<br />
BMPs at the Biltmore back in 2000. The sediment loss should have already been<br />
solved.<br />
Please see response to comment 109-a.<br />
Comment 11-d: Comment Summary – Traffic can’t be met on the SR 28 narrow roadway – will cause<br />
public safety issues in emergencies.<br />
Speaker 12 – Kelly Toomey<br />
Please see responses to comments 93-s, 196-b and 322-ja and refer to Master<br />
Response 2, 3 and 4.<br />
Comment 12-a: Comment Summary – Promotes health and wellness center. Project will offer<br />
preventative care for health. Investigate the business model – will it serve<br />
community as a medical center?<br />
The Project does not include a medical center.<br />
Comment 12-b: Comment Summary – Wants to make sure project funding is in place to see<br />
construction all the way through to completion.<br />
Speaker 13 – Jackie ???<br />
Please see responses to comments 54, 137-h, 171-c, 196-f, 286-bh, 313-h, 322-cr,<br />
322-ie, 337-g, 338-f, 338-p and 363-c.<br />
Comment 13-a: Comment Summary – Wants to attract geo tourists to the Basin and thinks Boulder<br />
Bay will help the lakes Tourism model.<br />
Speaker 14 – Derrick Aaron<br />
This is not a comment on the content or adequacy of the DEIS. This information is<br />
passed on to the Project proponent and decision maker(s) for consideration. No<br />
further response to this comment in relation to the DEIS is warranted.<br />
Comment 14-a: Comment Summary – Traffic creates atmospheric nitrogen deposition into the Lake.<br />
Auto traffic increases air emissions. The Basin has been dry lately at the same time<br />
that Lake clarity has stabilized. Thinks people staying at Boulder Bay will leave the<br />
resort and increase traffic levels.<br />
Please see responses to comments 93-t, 100-d, 322-an and Master Responses 2, 3<br />
and 4.<br />
Comment 14-b: Comment Summary – Does not want development like <strong>Tahoe</strong> City or South Lake<br />
<strong>Tahoe</strong> in the north shore. Biking will suffer with increased vehicle trips.<br />
PAGE 8- 166 HAUGE BRUECK ASSOCIATES SEPTEMBER 8 , 2010