Rice C.W., Moorman T.B., Beare M, 1996. Role <strong>of</strong> <strong>microbial</strong> biomass carbon <strong>and</strong> nitrogen in <strong>soil</strong> quality. In: Doran, 118 J.W., Jones, A.J. (Eds.), Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. SSSA Special Publication No. 49. Soil Sci Soc Am , Madison, Wisconsin, 203–215. Riffaldi R., Saviozzi A., Levi-Minzi R., 1996. Carbon mineralization kinetics as influenced by <strong>soil</strong> properties. Biol Fertil Soil 22, 293-298. Rustad L.E., Campbell J.L., Marion G.M., et al. 2001. A meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> the response <strong>of</strong> <strong>soil</strong> <strong>respiration</strong>, net nitrogen mineralization,v<strong>and</strong> aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia, 126, 543–562. Schjonning P., Elmholt S., Munkholm L.J., Debosz K., 2002. Soil quality aspects <strong>of</strong> humid s<strong>and</strong>y loams as influenced by organic <strong>and</strong> conventional long-term management. Agric Ecosyst Environ 88, 195–214. Sparling G.P. 1997. Soil <strong>microbial</strong> biomass, activity <strong>and</strong> nutrient cycling as indicators <strong>of</strong> <strong>soil</strong> health. In: Pankhurst C.E., Doube B.M., Gupta V.V.S.R. (eds), Biological indicators <strong>of</strong> <strong>soil</strong> health, CAB International Wallingford UK, pp. 97-119. Stark S., Kytoviita M.M., 2006. Simulated grazer effects on <strong>microbial</strong> <strong>respiration</strong> in a subarctic meadow: implications for nutrient competition between plants <strong>and</strong> <strong>soil</strong> microorganisms. Appl Soil Ecol 31, 20-31. Sun O.J., Cambell J., Law B.E., et al., 2004. Dynamics <strong>of</strong> carbon storage in <strong>soil</strong>s <strong>and</strong> detritus across chronosequences <strong>of</strong> different forest types in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Glob Change Biol 10, 1470–1481. Tracy B.F., Frank D.A., 1998. Herbivore influence on <strong>soil</strong> <strong>microbial</strong> biomass <strong>and</strong> nitrogen mineralization in a northern grassl<strong>and</strong> ecosystem: Yellowstone National Park. Oecologia, 114, 556–562. Turner B.L., Hopkins D.W., Haygarth P.M., Ostle N., 2002. ß-Glucosidase sctivity in pasture <strong>soil</strong>s. Appl Soil Ecol 20, 157-162. Uhlirova E., Simek M., Santruckova H., 2005. Microbial transformation <strong>of</strong> organic matter in <strong>soil</strong>s <strong>of</strong> mountain grassl<strong>and</strong>s under different management. Appl Soil Ecol 28, 225-235. Vance E.D., Brookes P.C., Jenkinson D.S., 1987. An extraction method for measuring <strong>soil</strong> <strong>microbial</strong> biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 19, 703-707. Walker B., Steffen W., Canadell J., 1999. The terrestrial Biosphere <strong>and</strong> global change Implication for natural <strong>and</strong> managed ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Wan S., Hui D., Wallace L.L., 2005. Direct <strong>and</strong> indirect warming effects on ecosystem carbon processes in a tallgrass prairie. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 19, 1-13. Wan S., Luo Y., 2003. Substrate regulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>soil</strong> <strong>respiration</strong> in tall grass prairie: results <strong>of</strong> clipping <strong>and</strong> shading experiment. Glob Biogechem Cycle 17, 1-12. Wang W.J., Dalal R.C., Moody P.W., Smith C.J., 2003. Relationships <strong>of</strong> <strong>soil</strong> <strong>respiration</strong> to <strong>microbial</strong> biomass, substrate availability <strong>and</strong> clay content. Soil Biol Biochem 35, 273-284. Wang W., Guo J., Oikawa T., 2007. Contribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>root</strong> to <strong>soil</strong> <strong>respiration</strong> <strong>and</strong> C balance in disturbed <strong>and</strong> undisturbed grassl<strong>and</strong> communities, northeast China. J Biosci 32, 375-384. Wardle D.A., Ghani A., 1995. A critique <strong>of</strong> the <strong>microbial</strong> metabolic quotient (qCO2) as a bioindicator <strong>of</strong> disturbance <strong>and</strong> ecosystem development. Soil Biol Biochem 27 , 1601-1610. Whipps J.M., 1990. Carbon economy. In: Lynch, J.M. (Ed.), The Rhizosphere. John Wiley, New York, 52–97. Yakovchenko V., Sikora L.J., Kaufman D.D., 1996. A biologically based indicator <strong>of</strong> <strong>soil</strong> quality. Biol Fertil Soil 21, 245-251. Zhang W., Parker K.M., Luo Y., 2005. Soil <strong>microbial</strong> responses to experimental warming <strong>and</strong> clipping in a tallgrass prairie. Glob Change Biol 11, 266-277.
Zhou Z., Wan S., Luo Y., 2007. Source components <strong>and</strong> interannual variability <strong>of</strong> <strong>soil</strong> CO2 efflux under experimental warming <strong>and</strong> clipping in a grassl<strong>and</strong> ecosystem. Glob Change Biol 13, 761-775. Zhou Z., Sun O.J., Huang J., Li L., Liu P., Han X., 2007. Soil carbon <strong>and</strong> nitrogen stores <strong>and</strong> storage potential as affected by l<strong>and</strong>-use in an agro-pastoral ecotone <strong>of</strong> northern China. Biogeochem 82, 127-138. 119
- Page 1:
!!"% ( !"+ "!$ (!'! ,' - !"+ "!$ ##
- Page 4 and 5:
explain diurnal and seasonal change
- Page 6 and 7:
sull’intensità del flusso respir
- Page 8 and 9:
8 3.2.4. Data analyses and definiti
- Page 11 and 12:
1. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW 11
- Page 13 and 14:
times as much carbon as the terrest
- Page 15 and 16:
Fig. 3 Different soil C pools with
- Page 17 and 18:
1.3. Soil respiration sources Soil
- Page 19 and 20:
conditions, like soil type, plants
- Page 21 and 22:
For grasslands, the nature, frequen
- Page 23 and 24:
(a) (b) (c) Fig.7 Amplero (AQ, Ital
- Page 25 and 26:
magnitude of root respiration and o
- Page 27 and 28:
efficiency, indicating future posit
- Page 29 and 30:
approaches for studying of the cont
- Page 31 and 32:
Houghton R.A., 2003. Revised estima
- Page 33:
Vleeshouwers L.M., Verhagen A. 2002
- Page 36 and 37:
2.1. Introduction 36 Soil respirati
- Page 38 and 39:
38 In the year 2005 ten PVC collars
- Page 40 and 41:
2.2.4. Biochemical analyses Microbi
- Page 42 and 43:
42 Variation of soil respiration fr
- Page 44 and 45:
CO 2 efflux (mmol m -2 s -1 ) 44 CO
- Page 46 and 47:
46 All diurnal measurements of root
- Page 48 and 49:
48 Q10 R 2 p Rs 2.51 0.77 0.000 Ra
- Page 50 and 51:
the photosynthesis and its followin
- Page 52 and 53:
2.3.3. Inter-annual variation of so
- Page 54 and 55:
54 RS RHET 8 6 6 4 25 4 2 2 25 20 T
- Page 56 and 57:
2.4. Discussion 2.4.1. Partitioning
- Page 58 and 59:
measurements, the possibility to fi
- Page 60 and 61:
and Schlesinger, 1992; Moyano et al
- Page 62 and 63:
Janssens I.A., Pilegaard K., 2003.
- Page 64:
Xu X., Kuzyakov Y., Wanek W., Richt
- Page 67 and 68: 3.1. Introduction Soil respiration
- Page 69 and 70: Our experiment was conducted in a m
- Page 71 and 72: Lactic acid 13 C 13 CO2 Root-derive
- Page 73 and 74: At the end of the process, the subl
- Page 75 and 76: where, MAs - the mean age of the co
- Page 77 and 78: 13C of respiration ( o / oo ) 155 1
- Page 79 and 80: Total Label Recovered (TLR, %) Ra R
- Page 81 and 82: GPP (mmol m -2 s -1 ) 25 20 15 10 5
- Page 83 and 84: frequent and possibly they missed t
- Page 85 and 86: 3.4.3. Destructive vs. Non-destruct
- Page 87 and 88: Gavrichkova O., Kuzyakov Y., 2008.
- Page 90 and 91: Chapter source: 90 4. THE EFFCT OF
- Page 92 and 93: Bardgett et al. (1997) showed that
- Page 94 and 95: 94 Partitioning plots were installe
- Page 96 and 97: Microbial C was calculated as a dif
- Page 98 and 99: taken from 1 µg N-NO2 ml -1 soluti
- Page 100 and 101: ates between clipped and unclipped
- Page 102 and 103: Fig. 7 Total (Rs), root (Ra)- and m
- Page 104 and 105: 104 Rh, (CO 2 , mmolm -2 s -1 ) 7 6
- Page 106 and 107: Fig. 11 Cumulative microbial respir
- Page 108 and 109: 108 After the calculation of synthe
- Page 110 and 111: Fig. 16: a) Relationship between sy
- Page 112 and 113: an annual mowing the measurement wa
- Page 114 and 115: mineral N available to plants and N
- Page 116 and 117: Cambardella C.A., Elliott E.T., (19
- Page 120 and 121: 120
- Page 122 and 123: 5.1. Introduction 122 Nitrogen (N)
- Page 124 and 125: specie, c) an additional aim was to
- Page 126 and 127: 5.2.4. Sampling and analyses 126 Na
- Page 128 and 129: the differences between N and contr
- Page 130 and 131: 130 specific root respiration (max
- Page 132 and 133: Fig. 4 a) Intensity of 14 CO2 efflu
- Page 134 and 135: Fig. 6 a) values above zero: root-d
- Page 136 and 137: 136 Zea mays: A clear diurnal dynam
- Page 138 and 139: plants. The growth stage could cont
- Page 140 and 141: nitrates. At temperatures of 15 - 2
- Page 142 and 143: experiment could be responsible for
- Page 144 and 145: Horwath W.R., Pretziger K.S., Paul,
- Page 146 and 147: 146
- Page 148 and 149: 148 6.1 . Introduction In studies o
- Page 150 and 151: Regression analyses technique, whic
- Page 152 and 153: 152 The respiratory response with g
- Page 154 and 155: 154 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 85% 13%
- Page 156 and 157: 6.3.2. 2008: Mesh- exclusion vs. re
- Page 158 and 159: 6.4. Discussion 6.4.1. Mesh-exclusi
- Page 160 and 161: introduction in a small soil sample
- Page 162 and 163: component, expressing a total soil
- Page 164 and 165: Kucera C.L., Kirkham D.R., 1971. So
- Page 166: Acknowledgements This work was poss