19.06.2013 Views

Preprint volume - SIBM

Preprint volume - SIBM

Preprint volume - SIBM

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pre-print Volume – Introductory lecture<br />

Topic 1: BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION SCIENCE: CONTRIBUTING TO MANAGEMENT<br />

that a trend towards more intense and widespread pressures is bad when these pressures<br />

overlap with the habitats under investigation. As well as a variety in the criteria uses to<br />

look at trends, there is also the issue that the reference points used to assess state are<br />

very much dependent on when monitoring and long-term time series information<br />

becomes available. For species, trends are measured from the 1940s (plankton), 1960s<br />

(grey seals), 1980s (harbour seals), 1986 (seabirds), 1975/76 (waterbirds), 1980s (fish)<br />

and 1994 (cetaceans). For habitats there is no monitoring data similar to that collected<br />

for the species groups, which means the assessment of status cannot be compared<br />

against a particular decade: baseline conditions are defined, therefore, as “a concept of<br />

former unimpacted conditions”. The benefits of the species chapters is that at least real<br />

long term trends can be shown, based on actual evidence, despite the fact that the lack<br />

of an agreed reference point (baseline) means changes can’t be compared in a<br />

consistent way across the groups (how close or far is the status from a specified target<br />

value). The issue of choosing a “baseline” or reference point to represent the vision<br />

goes beyond what scientists can deduce by analyzing data and trends and also becomes<br />

linked to what is acceptable to policy-makers, stakeholders and the wider public. An<br />

example is to consider the idea that large (and preferably stable or increasing) species<br />

populations are a good thing. Grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) population numbers are<br />

at historically high levels in the UK and recent evidence suggests a “leveling off”,<br />

probably due to density dependent factors. However, the high numbers of grey seals in<br />

the UK, as elsewhere in the world, is actually seen as a problem by groups such as<br />

fishermen who see them as competitors for resources (Pinnegar et al., in press). At<br />

least the high numbers can be attributed to positive developments such as being<br />

protected from human persecution (Duck, 2010 in press). Despite declines in seabird<br />

numbers in many UK regions, there has been a large increase in the number of Fulmars<br />

(Fulmarus glacialis). However, this is thought to be almost entirely due to the fact that<br />

Fulmars feed on discards from fishing boats so that numbers are elevated beyond levels<br />

that naturally occurring food sources can sustain (Mitchell, 2010 in press). There are<br />

many other cases in the marine environment where populations of species thrive due to<br />

anthropogenic causes. The main issue is what point is selected as a baseline/reference<br />

condition along a continuum from completely natural and unimpacted conditions to<br />

conditions occurring as a result of high levels of impact or exploitation. Mee et al.<br />

(2008) point out the value-laden nature of making this type of decision as different<br />

levels of impact are acceptable to different parties with differing values and<br />

expectations. For example, “former natural unimpacted conditions” is used as a<br />

reference point for habitats in CP2 and this type of reference point is implicit, if not<br />

explicit in many nature conservation approaches. The main difficulty with this<br />

approach is that there is very little information on what “unimpacted, natural, historical<br />

conditions” look like (Crowder, 2005). The commercial fish assessment has a<br />

completely different approach accepting high levels of exploitation (impact) as long as<br />

this is sustainable so the baseline is far from “unimpacted”. The issue for commercial<br />

fish stocks is that the agreed baseline is always changing anyway (Pauly, 1995). For<br />

the non-commercial fish communities in CP2 there was much discussion over where<br />

along this continuum the baseline/reference point should be with the result that two<br />

analyses are presented, one using historical relatively unimpacted conditions and one<br />

using a more recent period.<br />

Conclusions - To summarise, there is a major challenge in defining what is meant by<br />

the vision of healthy and biologically diverse seas and CP2 has made an important<br />

41 st S.I.B.M. CONGRESS Rapallo (GE), 7-11 June 2010<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!