Journal Volume 33 no. 2 (2008) - the Integrated Bar of the ...
Journal Volume 33 no. 2 (2008) - the Integrated Bar of the ... Journal Volume 33 no. 2 (2008) - the Integrated Bar of the ...
Merlin M. Magallona UNCLOS may demand that the constituent areas of land and water formations within the KIG be divided into categories of islands under paragraph 1 of Article 121 and of rocks under paragraph 2 of that provision, with the possible result in the reduction of areas of sovereign rights and jurisdiction. Paragraph 2 provides that “Rocks which cannot sustain human habitation or economic life of their own shall have no exclusive economic zone or continental shelf.” Constituted as a political unit, “as a distinct and separate municipality of the Province of Palawan,” KIG has a regime of internal waters around, between and connecting its constituent islands. It would appear as a result that the formula of “regime of islands” may eliminate the regime of internal waters between, around and separating the constituent islands of the KIG, and would have adverse effects on the sovereignty over the affected sea-bed, subsoil as well as the air space. Overall, on account of the constitutional recognition under the other-territories clause, territorial sovereignty over the KIG under Presidential Decree No. 1596 should be beyond statutory alteration in order to prevent derogation of the national territory as defined in Article I of the Constitution. Note that the said Presidential Decree sets out in precise technical description the boundaries of the KIG, together with the identification of the furthest points which, if connected by straight lines would serve or become the baselines. Hence, not only that the changes to be introduced by the bill would prove to be superfluous, but these would be as well inimical to territorial sovereignty. 2. Reorganizing the National Territory: Shift from The Treaty of Paris to the UNCLOS A. The Philippines as an Archipelago 2.1. By Article III of the Treaty of Paris, “Spain cedes to the United States the archipelago known as the Philippine Islands.” 19 The term archipelago used as descriptive of the Philippines pertains to a historically established entity organized into one political unit. Sovereignty of the King of Spain was proclaimed over the whole Archipelago with Manila declared as its capital, 20 and governed as such for more than three centuries as a unity of land and water. Under a centralized administration as a Spanish possession, the Philippines then consisted of thirty-three provinces, from Luzon to Mindanao, inhabited by a population of about 5 million paying tribute to the Spanish royal treasury. 21 Following the defeat of the Spanish forces in the 19 Emphasis added. 20 John Foreman, The Philippine Islands, 1906, p. 36. 21 See Jean Mallet, The Philippines: History, Geography, Custom, Agriculture, Industry and Commerce of the Spanish Colonies in Oceania, 1994, trans. By Pura-Santillan-Castrence, Chap. V. 10 IBP JOURNAL
A Framework for the Study of National Territory: A Statement of the Problem battle of Manila by the US occupying forces, the terms of capitulation were signed by the military authorities of both camps, the principal stipulation of which was the surrender of the whole Philippine Archipelago. 22 Relinquishment of sovereignty to the United States over the Philippines as a political unity covered all aspects of governmental powers, including the determination of status of Spanish subjects and of the native population in the entire territory ceded to the United States. 23 In transition from military government, the Instructions of US President McKinley of 7 April 1900 strengthened the “utilization of the islands” into an archipelagic unity considered as one juridical category this time to be administered by a central civil government exercising legislative authority throughout the entire archipelago, which included “the making of rules and orders having the effect of law, … the raising of revenues by taxes, customs duties and imposts; the appropriation and expenditure of public funds of the Islands; the establishment of an education system to secure an efficient civil service; the organization of a system of courts; the organization and establishment of municipal and departmental governments”, and the institution of the English language as a common medium of communication, “[i]n view of the great member of languages” spoken by the sectors of population in various parts of the archipelago. 2.2. Thus, long before the international law of the sea has evolved the archipelagic concept that is now crystallized in Article 46(1) of the UNCLOS, the Philippines was already established as an archipelago in unity of land and water as formalized in Article III of the Treaty of Paris, together with its authoritative interpretation set out above. It is instructive that a study on mid-ocean archipelagos that formed part of the preparatory work of the 1958 UN Conference on the Law of the Sea reflects the politico-geologic nature of the archipelago exemplified in the case of the Philippine Islands. Prepared by Jens Evensen, it defines outlaying or mid-ocean archipelagos as “groups of islands situated out in the ocean at such distance from the coasts of firm lands as to be considered as an independent whole rather than forming part of or outer coastline of the mainland.” 24 The study goes on to point out the geographical and historical peculiarities of outlaying [or mid-ocean] archipelagos: No hard-and-fast rule exists whereby a State is compelled to disregard the geographic, historical (and economical) peculiarities of outlaying archipelagos. Frequently the only natural and practical solution is to treat such outlaying archipelagos as a whole for the delimitation of territorial waters by drawing straight baselines from the outermost points of the archipelago - that is, from the outermost points of the constituent islands, islets and rocks - and by drawing the 22 Foreman, op. cit., at 464-465. 23 See Treaty of Paris, Arts. VIII and IX. 24 Document A/CONF. 13/18. See UN Conference on the Law of the Sea, 1958, vol. I, p. 290. Emphasis added. VOLUME 33 NUMBER 2 (SEPTEMBER 2008) 11
- Page 2 and 3: The IBP Journal INTEGRATED BAR OF T
- Page 4 and 5: The IBP JOURNAL (ISSN 0118-9247) is
- Page 6 and 7: From Spratlys in South China Sea, t
- Page 8 and 9: Merlin M. Magallona These appurtena
- Page 10 and 11: Merlin M. Magallona Preparatory to
- Page 12 and 13: Merlin M. Magallona [2] “The Phil
- Page 14 and 15: Merlin M. Magallona There are two l
- Page 18 and 19: Merlin M. Magallona seaward limit o
- Page 20 and 21: Merlin M. Magallona they would assu
- Page 22 and 23: Merlin M. Magallona Under the UNCLO
- Page 24 and 25: Merlin M. Magallona Philippines and
- Page 26 and 27: Merlin M. Magallona these normal ro
- Page 28 and 29: Oscar G. Raro 4. The Convention sha
- Page 30 and 31: Merlin M. Magallona under internati
- Page 32 and 33: Merlin M. Magallona started in the
- Page 34 and 35: Leo Tito L. Ausan, Jr. The On-going
- Page 36 and 37: Leo Tito L. Ausan, Jr. Discernibly,
- Page 38 and 39: Leo Tito L. Ausan, Jr. Islands exer
- Page 40 and 41: Leo Tito L. Ausan, Jr. the understa
- Page 42 and 43: Leo Tito L. Ausan, Jr. archipelago
- Page 44 and 45: UNCLOS Minimum Expectations Leo Tit
- Page 46 and 47: Leo Tito L. Ausan, Jr. establish it
- Page 48 and 49: Leo Tito L. Ausan, Jr. “The Unite
- Page 50 and 51: Leo Tito L. Ausan, Jr. From the des
- Page 52 and 53: Leo Tito L. Ausan, Jr. Manifestly,
- Page 54 and 55: Leo Tito L. Ausan, Jr. How should R
- Page 56 and 57: Leo Tito L. Ausan, Jr. much urgency
- Page 58 and 59: Leo Tito L. Ausan, Jr. Article 121
- Page 60 and 61: Leo Tito L. Ausan, Jr. provisions o
- Page 62 and 63: Leo Tito L. Ausan, Jr. UNCLOS Marit
- Page 64 and 65: Amado D. Valdez The Philippines was
Merlin M. Magallona<br />
UNCLOS may demand that <strong>the</strong> constituent areas <strong>of</strong> land and water formations<br />
within <strong>the</strong> KIG be divided into categories <strong>of</strong> islands under paragraph 1 <strong>of</strong> Article<br />
121 and <strong>of</strong> rocks under paragraph 2 <strong>of</strong> that provision, with <strong>the</strong> possible result in <strong>the</strong><br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> areas <strong>of</strong> sovereign rights and jurisdiction. Paragraph 2 provides that<br />
“Rocks which can<strong>no</strong>t sustain human habitation or eco<strong>no</strong>mic life <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir own shall<br />
have <strong>no</strong> exclusive eco<strong>no</strong>mic zone or continental shelf.”<br />
Constituted as a political unit, “as a distinct and separate municipality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Province <strong>of</strong> Palawan,” KIG has a regime <strong>of</strong> internal waters around, between and<br />
connecting its constituent islands. It would appear as a result that <strong>the</strong> formula <strong>of</strong><br />
“regime <strong>of</strong> islands” may eliminate <strong>the</strong> regime <strong>of</strong> internal waters between, around<br />
and separating <strong>the</strong> constituent islands <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> KIG, and would have adverse effects<br />
on <strong>the</strong> sovereignty over <strong>the</strong> affected sea-bed, subsoil as well as <strong>the</strong> air space.<br />
Overall, on account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> constitutional recognition under <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r-territories<br />
clause, territorial sovereignty over <strong>the</strong> KIG under Presidential Decree No. 1596<br />
should be beyond statutory alteration in order to prevent derogation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> national<br />
territory as defined in Article I <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Constitution. Note that <strong>the</strong> said Presidential<br />
Decree sets out in precise technical description <strong>the</strong> boundaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> KIG, toge<strong>the</strong>r<br />
with <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>st points which, if connected by straight lines<br />
would serve or become <strong>the</strong> baselines. Hence, <strong>no</strong>t only that <strong>the</strong> changes to be<br />
introduced by <strong>the</strong> bill would prove to be superfluous, but <strong>the</strong>se would be as well<br />
inimical to territorial sovereignty.<br />
2. Reorganizing <strong>the</strong> National<br />
Territory: Shift from The Treaty<br />
<strong>of</strong> Paris to <strong>the</strong> UNCLOS<br />
A. The Philippines as an Archipelago<br />
2.1. By Article III <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treaty <strong>of</strong> Paris, “Spain cedes to <strong>the</strong> United States <strong>the</strong><br />
archipelago k<strong>no</strong>wn as <strong>the</strong> Philippine Islands.” 19 The term archipelago used as descriptive<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Philippines pertains to a historically established entity organized into one<br />
political unit. Sovereignty <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> King <strong>of</strong> Spain was proclaimed over <strong>the</strong> whole<br />
Archipelago with Manila declared as its capital, 20 and governed as such for more<br />
than three centuries as a unity <strong>of</strong> land and water. Under a centralized administration<br />
as a Spanish possession, <strong>the</strong> Philippines <strong>the</strong>n consisted <strong>of</strong> thirty-three provinces,<br />
from Luzon to Mindanao, inhabited by a population <strong>of</strong> about 5 million paying tribute<br />
to <strong>the</strong> Spanish royal treasury. 21 Following <strong>the</strong> defeat <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spanish forces in <strong>the</strong><br />
19 Emphasis added.<br />
20 John Foreman, The Philippine Islands, 1906, p. 36.<br />
21 See Jean Mallet, The Philippines: History, Geography, Custom, Agriculture, Industry and Commerce <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Spanish Colonies in Oceania, 1994, trans. By Pura-Santillan-Castrence, Chap. V.<br />
10 IBP JOURNAL