18.06.2013 Views

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sundaram (1977) reported control of ergot<br />

with three sprays of ziram (0.2%); Anahosur<br />

(1979) reported mancozeb (0.2%) gave better<br />

control than ziram (0.2%). In subsequent years,<br />

systemic fungicides like carbox<strong>in</strong> (Vitavax ® ) and<br />

thiophanate (Tops<strong>in</strong> ® ) have shown some promise<br />

at some locations.<br />

Study of pollen management and effective<br />

poll<strong>in</strong>ation us<strong>in</strong>g a spray of cytok<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>s, sucrose,<br />

urea, and growth hormones is now underway.<br />

Rust<br />

Rust is destructive <strong>in</strong> the ra<strong>in</strong>y and postra<strong>in</strong>y<br />

seasons. Extensive screen<strong>in</strong>g of sorghum genotypes<br />

by adopt<strong>in</strong>g the spreader row technique<br />

(Sharma and Ja<strong>in</strong> 1975; Sharma 1980) and four<br />

spray <strong>in</strong>oculations with uredospores on alternate<br />

days beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g on the 45th day of sow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

helped to create high disease pressure and identify<br />

resistant genotypes. Disease scor<strong>in</strong>g (1 = no<br />

disease and 5 = more than 51% leaf area damaged)<br />

showed SPV-247,1622 B, 2947 B, SB 401 B,<br />

IS 3443, IS 3547, and IS 18758 were immune to<br />

rust. Resistant genotypes were SPV-81,126, 245,<br />

241, 312, 346, 351, 386, 459, 462, 472, 736, 775,<br />

SPH-159, 176, 185, 187, 361, 364, MSH-51, 52,<br />

DMS 1 B, M 9 B, M 12 B, MR 750, R 12 8, R 259,<br />

RSR 9, IS 13442, E 36-1, IS 8185, IS 8607, and IS<br />

7254. Most of these are of the tan plant type. The<br />

level of resistance <strong>in</strong> the newly released genotypes,<br />

compared to earlier genotypes, is very<br />

high. Anahosur et al. (1981) reported on several<br />

of the germplasm l<strong>in</strong>es tested, and the majority<br />

of the resistant l<strong>in</strong>es were of the tan plant color.<br />

<strong>Sorghum</strong> sown before the 3rd week of June<br />

escaped from rust (Anahosur et al. 1982), whereas<br />

<strong>in</strong> later sow<strong>in</strong>gs, made through October, the<br />

disease was very high. <strong>Sorghum</strong> sown <strong>in</strong> November<br />

and December showed less disease.<br />

Gangadharan et al. (1976) reported effective<br />

control of rust and leaf blight with z<strong>in</strong>eb spray<br />

(0.2%). Agarwal and Kotasthane (1973) reported<br />

control of rust by seed dress<strong>in</strong>g with oxycarbox<strong>in</strong><br />

(Plantvax ® ) followed by two sprays at<br />

0.1%. Sharma (1980) reported ziram (0.2%), captan<br />

(0.2%), and thiram (0.2%) as foliar sprays<br />

gave effective control. Anahosur (1981) reported<br />

that four sprays of mancozeb at 0.2% or 0.4% at<br />

10-day <strong>in</strong>tervals from the 35th day of sow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

gave significantly better control than ziram, captan,<br />

and z<strong>in</strong>eb.<br />

With regard to <strong>in</strong>heritance of resistance<br />

studies, Rana et al. (1976) reported that susceptibility<br />

is dom<strong>in</strong>ant and resistance is governed<br />

by three major genes. Indira et al. (1983) showed<br />

that tan x tan crosses showed more resistance<br />

than tan x purple or purple x purple crosses.<br />

Tan parents transmitted resistance. Incomplete<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ance was seen <strong>in</strong> some tan x tan crosses <strong>in</strong><br />

which one parent was highly resistant. Our<br />

study <strong>in</strong>volved crosses 296 B(S) x IS 3547 (R), IS<br />

3443(R) x QL (S), and 296 B(S) x QL 3 (S) and<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicated that resistance is dom<strong>in</strong>ant and governed<br />

by one gene 3(R): 1(S) or two genes 15(R):<br />

KS).<br />

Leaf spots<br />

Resistance evaluation aga<strong>in</strong>st zonate leaf spot,<br />

rough spot, leaf blight, gray leaf spot, and sooty<br />

stripe showed the follow<strong>in</strong>g genotypes to be resistant<br />

at all AICMIP centres: SPV-81, 126, 312,<br />

346, 351, 386, 462, 472, 544, 736, 775, APH-159,<br />

176,185,187, 264, 361,362,411, M 6 B, M 10 B, M<br />

12 B, DMS 1 B, SB 101 B, AKMS 3 B, ICS 4 B, CS<br />

3541, SB 1085, R 250, R 390, R 1036, IS 3443, IS<br />

8283, IS 8607, IS 3547, and IS 18758.<br />

Anahosur (1986b) reported control of rust,<br />

anthracnose, and zonate leaf spot by mancozeb<br />

(0.2%) spray, whereas Sharma (1980) reported<br />

control of leaf spot diseases by z<strong>in</strong>eb (0.2%) or<br />

ziram (0.2%).<br />

Anahosur et al. (1980b) reported s<strong>in</strong>gle-gene<br />

resistance for gray leaf spot; susceptibility is<br />

dom<strong>in</strong>ant.<br />

Inheritance of resistance to zonate leaf spot <strong>in</strong><br />

crosses 296 B(S) x IS 3547(R), IS 3443(R) x QL<br />

3(S), and 296 B(S) x QL 3(S) <strong>in</strong>dicated that resistance<br />

is a dom<strong>in</strong>ant trait and governed by three<br />

genes 57(R): 7(S) or four genes 243(R): 13(S)<br />

Red stripe<br />

Usually sporadic <strong>in</strong> Maharashtra and Karnataka,<br />

this virus disease appeared <strong>in</strong> a severe form <strong>in</strong><br />

Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, and<br />

elsewhere <strong>in</strong> postra<strong>in</strong>y season, 1987.<br />

Mali and Garud (1978) identified this virus as<br />

a Johnsongrass stra<strong>in</strong> of sugarcane mosaic virus<br />

(SCMV). Several genotypes were tested; <strong>India</strong>n<br />

sorghums 73, 844, 952, 1040, 1518, 2301, 2522,<br />

2601, 5169, 7499, 7998, 9227, and Gobwani were<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!