Sorghum Diseases in India
Sorghum Diseases in India
Sorghum Diseases in India
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Effective screen<strong>in</strong>g techniques for mass<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g of sorghum genotypes have been<br />
developed (Anahosur 1980,1987; Anahosur and<br />
Hegde 1979). Genotypes are exposed to oospores<br />
and to conidia. Some 800 varieties, 400<br />
hybrids, 50 B-l<strong>in</strong>es, and about 25 R-l<strong>in</strong>es were<br />
tested by 1987. The resistant genotypes (show<strong>in</strong>g<br />
less than 5% systemic <strong>in</strong>fection) are SPV-35,<br />
81,104,126,166, 291, 312, 346, 351, 462, 736, 775;<br />
CSH-2,3,4,5,6; SPH-10,11,12,30,39,59,68,159,<br />
176, and 185; DMS 1 B, 2219 B, 3660 B, 3691 B,<br />
1202 B, 1807 B, M 12 B; CSV 4, PVK 3, PVK 10,<br />
and MR 750.<br />
A selection from Nandyal, <strong>in</strong> Andhra Pradesh,<br />
DMRS 1 (IS 27042) was developed and<br />
found to possess stable resistance to downy mildew<br />
(Anahosur et al. 1984a). From International<br />
<strong>Sorghum</strong> Downy Mildew Nursery (ISDMN), the<br />
stable resistant genotypes are IS-3443, 27042,<br />
22230, 22231, and 18757; these were completely<br />
free from <strong>in</strong>fection.<br />
Breed<strong>in</strong>g resistant varieties us<strong>in</strong>g IS 3443 and<br />
IS 27042 is <strong>in</strong> progress at Dharwad. The cross SB<br />
905(S) x DMRS 1 (R) has yielded several highyield<strong>in</strong>g<br />
progenies coupled with high levels of<br />
resistance; 10 of these are <strong>in</strong> an advance stage of<br />
evaluation. In <strong>India</strong>, hybrids developed on 2296<br />
A (17.2-63.6% diseased) and 199 A (34-41.6%<br />
diseased) were susceptible, whereas those produced<br />
on 2219-A and 2077-A and DMS 1 B have<br />
shown resistance (4.5-8.9%, 3.4-11.4%, and 1.7-<br />
4.6% disease <strong>in</strong>cidence, respectively).<br />
Rajasab et al. (1979,1980a, 1980b) reported the<br />
dispersal of conidia as far as 80 m for as long as 5<br />
hours after midnight. Raml<strong>in</strong>gam and Rajasab<br />
(1981) reported least <strong>in</strong>fection from oospores<br />
and maximum <strong>in</strong>fection from conidia; thus<br />
conidia are known to play major roles <strong>in</strong> epiphytotics.<br />
Prabhu et al. (1983, 1984) reported the seedborne<br />
nature of downy mildew <strong>in</strong> sorghum.<br />
These workers detected mycelium <strong>in</strong> 40% of the<br />
seeds and <strong>in</strong> 5% of the endosperm. Mycelium<br />
was not found <strong>in</strong> the embryo. Kaveriappa and<br />
Safeeulla (1978) expressed doubt as to the survival<br />
of mycelium when seeds are sundried.<br />
Shetty and Safeeulla (1981) reported oospore<br />
germ<strong>in</strong>ation by branched aseptate germ tubes<br />
from weathered oospores. A study of the <strong>in</strong>heritance<br />
of resistance to downy mildew (Rana et al.<br />
1982a) reported that resistance is dom<strong>in</strong>ant and<br />
controlled by three genes. Bhat et al. (1982),<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g crosses 296(S) x QL 3 (R) and 296 (S) x<br />
50<br />
Uchv 2(R), reported that resistance is dom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />
and controlled by four genes. We have studied<br />
this aspect, us<strong>in</strong>g crosses DMRS 1(R) x QL 3(R),<br />
269 B(S) x IS 3547(R), 296 B(S) x QL 3(R), and IS<br />
3443(R) x QL 3 (R) and found that resistance is<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant and controlled by three genes 57 (R):<br />
7(S) or by four genes 243(R): 13(S).<br />
Effective control of downy mildew by different<br />
formulations of metalaxyl was achieved as<br />
seed dress (Venugopal and Safeeulla 1978), and<br />
as seed dress + spray (Anahosur and Patil 1980,<br />
1983b). <strong>Sorghum</strong> downy mildew cure was also<br />
reported (Anahosur and Patil 1980, 1981b) and<br />
subsequently a spray schedule for cure was developed.<br />
Metalaxyl applied to seed at the rate of<br />
1 or 2 g a.i. kg -1 seed was not phytotoxic, but<br />
when applied at 4,6, or 8 g a.i. kg -1 of seed it was<br />
phytotoxic. Seeds treated at 1 or 2 g a.i. kg -1<br />
could be preserved at room conditions for 9<br />
months without affect<strong>in</strong>g either the efficacy of<br />
fungitoxicant or seed germ<strong>in</strong>ation (Anahosur<br />
1986a).<br />
Ergot<br />
Systematically estimated gra<strong>in</strong>-yield losses from<br />
ergot are not available, but heavy gra<strong>in</strong> losses<br />
are realized <strong>in</strong> commercial and seed-production<br />
plots. All A-l<strong>in</strong>es are highly susceptible. Extensive<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g of varieties, hybrids, A- and Bl<strong>in</strong>es,<br />
R- l<strong>in</strong>es, and some germplasms by artificial<br />
<strong>in</strong>oculation show the less-susceptible (30% <strong>in</strong>fection)<br />
genotypes to be CS 3541, IS 3443, IS<br />
14332, IS 3547, SPH 232, and DMS 1 B. The<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g procedure <strong>in</strong>volves four even<strong>in</strong>g<br />
spray <strong>in</strong>oculations of a rich conidial suspension<br />
on newly emerged earheads on alternate days<br />
and then cover<strong>in</strong>g the heads with paper bags.<br />
This helped to <strong>in</strong>duce high disease pressure.<br />
Evaluation was on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1= no<br />
disease, and 5 = at least 51% spikelets <strong>in</strong>fected.<br />
Early sow<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> Maharashtra, Karnataka,<br />
and Gujarat avoided the disease (Sangitrao et al.<br />
1979; Anahosur and Patil 1982a). The meteorological<br />
conditions favor<strong>in</strong>g honeydew development<br />
were m<strong>in</strong>imum temperatures of 18-<br />
31°C, relative humidities of 65-85%, and drizzl<strong>in</strong>g<br />
ra<strong>in</strong>s. Dry weather follow<strong>in</strong>g the honeydew<br />
stage favored sclerotia development<br />
(Sangitrao and Bhade 1979; Anahosur et al.<br />
1984b). In the Karnataka sow<strong>in</strong>gs, growth of<br />
Cerebella sorghi suppressed sclerotia production.