18.06.2013 Views

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1. Spray-<strong>in</strong>oculation of earheads with spore suspension<br />

of Fusarium, Curvularia, and Phoma;<br />

cover with paper bag.<br />

2. Spray earheads with water; cover with paper<br />

bag.<br />

3. Leave earheads exposed to natural <strong>in</strong>fection<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the ra<strong>in</strong>y season.<br />

Analysis of data showed these three methods<br />

to be on par with each other.<br />

Extensive test<strong>in</strong>g of breeder's material and<br />

germplasm, identified the follow<strong>in</strong>g as resistant<br />

on the basis of less reduction <strong>in</strong> field grade, less<br />

reduction <strong>in</strong> threshed gra<strong>in</strong> grade, maximum<br />

germ<strong>in</strong>ation (90-95%), and no loss <strong>in</strong> 100-mass.<br />

The l<strong>in</strong>es are SPV-126,312,346,351,386,472, and<br />

2219 B; DMS1 B; MR 750 and 849; IS-3443, 3547,<br />

14322, 10892, 14375, 14380, 24995, and 24996.<br />

Some of these (IS-14375, 14380, 24995, 24996,<br />

and 10892) are brown sorghums and were completely<br />

free from molds. The l<strong>in</strong>es IS-3443,24995,<br />

and 249% have been utilized <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

white-gra<strong>in</strong>ed high-yield<strong>in</strong>g sorghums, and the<br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g generations were tested at Dharwad.<br />

Efforts were made to identify effective fungicides<br />

for gra<strong>in</strong> mold control. It was found that<br />

a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of captan (0.2%) + aureofung<strong>in</strong><br />

(200 ppm) was best (Table 3), followed by mancozeb<br />

(0.27) + captan (0.2%), and then thiram<br />

(0.2%) + carbendazim (0.5%).<br />

Charcoal rot<br />

Extensive isolations from roots and stalks of diseased<br />

plants collected dur<strong>in</strong>g the ra<strong>in</strong>y and postra<strong>in</strong>y<br />

seasons yielded Macrophom<strong>in</strong>a phaseol<strong>in</strong>a,<br />

Fusarium moniliforme, and other Fusarium spp,<br />

separately and <strong>in</strong> mixtures. Most of the highyield<strong>in</strong>g<br />

varieties and hybrids presently cultivated<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>India</strong> are highly susceptible. Gra<strong>in</strong>yield<br />

losses have been reported to range from 23<br />

to 64% (Mughogho and Pande 1983, pp. 11-24)<br />

and 15 to 55% (Anahosur and Patil 1983a). Plants<br />

receiv<strong>in</strong>g 80 kg ha- 1 or more nitrogen fertilization<br />

showed more disease than those receiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from 40 to 80 kg ha" 1 or those receiv<strong>in</strong>g less<br />

than 40 kg ha -1 (Anahosur et al. 1977). Further,<br />

Avadhani et al. (1979), and Mote and Ramshe<br />

(1980) reported similar results, i.e., excess nitrogen<br />

predisposes the plants to susceptibility.<br />

Effect of sow<strong>in</strong>g date on charcoal rot <strong>in</strong>cidence<br />

<strong>in</strong> the ra<strong>in</strong>y and postra<strong>in</strong>y seasons revealed that<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>y season sow<strong>in</strong>gs made <strong>in</strong> July suffered<br />

Table 3. Experiments with six chemical control formulations for control of gra<strong>in</strong> molds of CV<br />

296 B (Average of four locations).<br />

Treatment<br />

Field Threshed-<br />

grade<br />

(1-5) 2<br />

gra<strong>in</strong> grade<br />

(1-5) 2<br />

Gra<strong>in</strong> yield<br />

(t ha -1 ) Rank 1<br />

Captan 0.2% + aureofung<strong>in</strong> (200 ppm) 1.5 1.4 3.2 1<br />

Mancozeb 0.2% + captan (0.2%) 1.6 1.5 3.1 2<br />

Thiram (0.2%) + carbendazim (0.05%) 1.7 1.6 2.0 3<br />

Captan (0.2%) 1.7 1.5 2.8 4<br />

Carbendazim (0.1%) (Bavist<strong>in</strong> ® ) 1.8 1.6 2.8 5<br />

Captafol (0.2%) (Difolatan ® ) 1.8 1.6 2.6 6<br />

Control 4.2 3.7 2.5 7<br />

1. Based on effectiveness <strong>in</strong> prevent<strong>in</strong>g gra<strong>in</strong> yield losses.<br />

2 Scored on a 1-5 scale: where 1 = least disease and 5 = most disease.<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!