18.06.2013 Views

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

l<strong>in</strong>es) and tar spot (51 resistant l<strong>in</strong>es). Not one of<br />

the l<strong>in</strong>es or varieties was completely free of gray<br />

leaf spot or tar spot, but expression of symptoms<br />

is delayed <strong>in</strong> resistant plants and fewer lesions<br />

appear. However, when 88 sorghum l<strong>in</strong>es were<br />

<strong>in</strong>oculated with Rhizoctonia solani all of the l<strong>in</strong>es<br />

were susceptible. Similarly, 50 l<strong>in</strong>es tested for<br />

resistance to head molds showed <strong>in</strong>fection (Dalmacio<br />

et al. 1981, Dalmacio 1982). Sources of resistance<br />

to most of the important sorghum<br />

diseases have been identified.<br />

Furthermore, Paderes and Dalmacio (1984)<br />

exam<strong>in</strong>ed resistance to tar spot by evaluat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

components of rate-reduc<strong>in</strong>g resistance to Phyllachora<br />

sorghi (Syn P. sacchari). The f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs reveal<br />

that resistance prolonged the latent period<br />

(LP) by 12%, shortened the <strong>in</strong>fectious period (IP)<br />

by 69%, reduced stomata size (SS) by 85%, and<br />

reduced sporulation capacity (SC) by 93%.<br />

Among these components, IP, SS, SC, and <strong>in</strong>fection<br />

frequency (IF) may be considered more<br />

important than LP. Correlation analysis showed<br />

that LP, SS, and SC were more strongly associated<br />

with each other than with IP.<br />

Screen<strong>in</strong>g work of 120 sorghum genotypes of<br />

the International <strong>Sorghum</strong> Multiple Disease Resistance<br />

Nursery (ISMDRN) established at the<br />

Southern M<strong>in</strong>danao Agricultural Research Center<br />

(SMARC) showed mean severity rat<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

rang<strong>in</strong>g from 1.3 for zonate leaf spot and Rhizoctonia<br />

disease to 4.5 for gra<strong>in</strong> molds. (Table 3).<br />

Table 3. Disease reactions of 120 ISMDRN'87<br />

sorghum entries screened at SMARC-USM,<br />

Tangonan, Kabacan, Cotabato, the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es,<br />

1987.<br />

Mean severity<br />

Disease rat<strong>in</strong>gs 1<br />

Zonate leaf spot 1.3<br />

Gray leaf spot 1.9<br />

Target leaf spot 1.7<br />

Rhizoctonia banded leaf<br />

and sheath blight 1.3<br />

Anthracnose 1.5<br />

Tar spot 3.5<br />

Gra<strong>in</strong> mold 4.5<br />

Root/stalk rots 1.8<br />

1. Scored on a 1-5 scale, where 1 = no symptoms and<br />

5 = severe <strong>in</strong>fection.<br />

38<br />

Phyllachora tar spot and head/gra<strong>in</strong> mold<br />

were severe and sorghum hybrids and cultivars<br />

tested were susceptible to these two diseases.<br />

Other foliar diseases had rat<strong>in</strong>gs rang<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

1.3 to 1.9, and the sorghum genotypes were<br />

resistant to most foliar diseases except tar spot.<br />

Head/gra<strong>in</strong> mold <strong>in</strong>fection had a mean severity<br />

of 4.5 (Table 3).<br />

The <strong>in</strong>cidence of a stalk rot complex <strong>in</strong> sorghum<br />

fields at SMARC-USM was also observed<br />

to be <strong>in</strong>fect<strong>in</strong>g most hybrids and cultivars tested.<br />

It was believed to have been caused by the comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

effect of Colletotrichum gram<strong>in</strong>icola, Fusarium<br />

moniliforme, and Rhizoctonia solani<br />

An <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g development was the release<br />

of a new sorghum hybrid by Pioneer Overseas<br />

Corporation, Philipp<strong>in</strong>es. This hybrid, Pioneer<br />

8258, was noted to have excellent resistance to<br />

target and gray leaf spots and some degree of<br />

resistance to Rhizoctonia disease, although Rhizoctonia<br />

resistance seems to be highly <strong>in</strong>fluenced<br />

by plant height.<br />

Research Needs<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the First National Symposium and Workshop<br />

on Corn and <strong>Sorghum</strong> Crop Protection,<br />

held at the University of Southern M<strong>in</strong>danao,<br />

17-20 Mar 1982 [sponsored by the Philipp<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Council for Agriculture and Resources Research<br />

and Development (PCARRD) and the M<strong>in</strong>istry<br />

of Agriculture and Food (now the Department<br />

of Agriculture)], Dalmacio and Exconde listed<br />

the Philipp<strong>in</strong>e research needs <strong>in</strong> sorghum pathology,<br />

as follows:<br />

1. Monitor disease occurrence on sorghum sow<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g the dry season and determ<strong>in</strong>e the<br />

relative importance.<br />

2. Search for sources of resistance to various diseases<br />

and develop resistant varieties.<br />

3. Establish disease nurseries <strong>in</strong> various sorghum-grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

areas.<br />

While yield loss has been demonstrated <strong>in</strong><br />

field experiments, it is necessary to determ<strong>in</strong>e<br />

the precise yield losses <strong>in</strong> cultivars and hybrids,<br />

at different disease <strong>in</strong>tensities, dur<strong>in</strong>g each cropp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

or sow<strong>in</strong>g season (Exconde 1982).<br />

Table 4 summarizes the research areas and<br />

current status of sorghum disease management<br />

for 13 sorghum diseases <strong>in</strong> the Philipp<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

Much rema<strong>in</strong>s to be studied <strong>in</strong> the areas of yieldloss<br />

assessment, epidemiology, host-pathogen

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!