18.06.2013 Views

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8. Use of field and controlled environment<br />

screen<strong>in</strong>g and other research techniques to<br />

obta<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation on:<br />

a. host/pathogen <strong>in</strong>teraction,<br />

b. germplasm response to foliar pathogens,<br />

and<br />

c. pathogen variability<br />

9. Research to understand the biological mechanism<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g survival and function of<br />

pathogen propagules.<br />

10. Determ<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>in</strong>fluences of naturally occurr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and <strong>in</strong>troduced epiphytic and other<br />

leaf microflora on host, pathogen, and host/<br />

pathogen <strong>in</strong>teractions be studied.<br />

Anthracnose<br />

1. Investigate host/parasite/environment <strong>in</strong>teractions.<br />

2. Evaluate known sources of resistance worldwide<br />

and screen nontested world collection<br />

items at known 'hot spots.'<br />

3. Monitor pathogen variability, us<strong>in</strong>g standard<br />

differential varieties and regionally important<br />

cultivars<br />

4. Determ<strong>in</strong>e relationships of gra<strong>in</strong> and foliar<br />

anthracnose to stalk rot.<br />

5. Determ<strong>in</strong>e mechanisms of anthracnose<br />

resistance.<br />

6. Evaluate chemicals (e.g., fungicides, plantgrowth<br />

regulators, etc.), cultural practices,<br />

and biological controls with the aim of develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

crop-management strategies for<br />

control.<br />

7. Develop more effective and relevant screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />

techniques for identify<strong>in</strong>g resistant<br />

materials.<br />

8. Determ<strong>in</strong>e role of seedborne <strong>in</strong>oculum.<br />

9. Identify and utilize improved and exotic<br />

sources of resistance by classical or <strong>in</strong>novative<br />

(biotechnological, genetic eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

etc.) methods.<br />

10. Determ<strong>in</strong>e the <strong>in</strong>heritance and heritability of<br />

resistance.<br />

11. Elucidate the etiology and epidemiology of<br />

the disease.<br />

12. Evaluate collected isolates from gram<strong>in</strong>aceous<br />

hosts at conta<strong>in</strong>ment facilities or <strong>in</strong><br />

a temperate climate with less sorghum hectarage<br />

to determ<strong>in</strong>e the variability of the<br />

pathogen and host range.<br />

13. Investigate taxonomy of Colletotrichum gram<strong>in</strong>icola<br />

on different gram<strong>in</strong>aceous hosts.<br />

14. Establish an 'Anthracnose on the Gram<strong>in</strong>eae'<br />

work<strong>in</strong>g group as part of the International<br />

Society of Plant Pathologists to<br />

promote cooperation <strong>in</strong> research activity<br />

with anthracnose on gram<strong>in</strong>aceous hosts.<br />

<strong>Sorghum</strong> Stalk Rot<br />

Because of the need for reliable methodology to<br />

screen genotypes resistant to stalk rot and a multilocational<br />

cooperative program for the identification<br />

of sources of resistance to this major<br />

sorghum disease, the Committee recommends:<br />

1. Methodology for stalk-rot screen<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

a. Use of nonsenescence and resistance to<br />

lodg<strong>in</strong>g as <strong>in</strong>dicators of stalk rot resistance.<br />

b. Use uniform criteria to evaluate genotypes.<br />

Use a 1-to-5 scale for both parameters,<br />

with a plant free of observable<br />

symptoms receiv<strong>in</strong>g a rat<strong>in</strong>g of 1, and a<br />

severely diseased or dead plant receiv<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

rat<strong>in</strong>g of 5. The lodg<strong>in</strong>g scale should be<br />

based on percentage of lodged plants.<br />

c. Make stalk rot reaction comparisons only<br />

with<strong>in</strong> entries of similar maturities.<br />

d. Take read<strong>in</strong>gs any time between physiological<br />

maturity and harvest if differential<br />

reactions permit comparisons among<br />

genotypes.<br />

e. Record flower<strong>in</strong>g date and plant height for<br />

each entry.<br />

f. Because of the relationship between susceptibility<br />

to stalk rot and high yield, we<br />

recommend that yield or a yield rat<strong>in</strong>g be<br />

recorded, particularly <strong>in</strong> resistant entries.<br />

This may reveal genotypes that comb<strong>in</strong>e<br />

high yield and stalk rot resistance.<br />

g. In a stalk rot-resistance evaluation sow<strong>in</strong>gs,<br />

we recommend entries be seeded <strong>in</strong><br />

4-m rows. In advanced l<strong>in</strong>es, use replications<br />

and multiple sow<strong>in</strong>g dates and locations<br />

as extensively as appropriate. We<br />

also recommend <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g local susceptible<br />

cultivars, sown strategically through<br />

the screen<strong>in</strong>g nursery. For early generation<br />

evaluations where replications are not necessary,<br />

we suggest sow<strong>in</strong>g at least one susceptible<br />

control for each five entries.<br />

2. Mult<strong>in</strong>ational Cooperative Program<br />

339

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!