18.06.2013 Views

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

population densities for optimum yields, disease<br />

and yield levels could be simultaneously<br />

studied with density traits on all cultivars.<br />

There is a high degree of heterogeneity for a<br />

number of traits <strong>in</strong> maicillos. This gives maicillos<br />

the stability that allows production of some<br />

gra<strong>in</strong>, even under quite unfavorable conditions.<br />

With respect to disease reaction, heterogeneity<br />

<strong>in</strong> a population can slow down epidemic development<br />

(Rob<strong>in</strong>son 1975). As changes are made<br />

<strong>in</strong> maicillos through breed<strong>in</strong>g programs, sufficient<br />

heterogeneity should be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed. The<br />

more susceptible genotypes can be elim<strong>in</strong>ated,<br />

replac<strong>in</strong>g them with new sources of resistance.<br />

The result<strong>in</strong>g plant population would then have<br />

the orig<strong>in</strong>al sources of resistance (if any), plus<br />

the new ones, and fewer or no extremely susceptible<br />

types.<br />

The <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g of sorghum with maize<br />

seems to reduce the severity of certa<strong>in</strong> foliar diseases;<br />

however, MDM had higher <strong>in</strong>cidence under<br />

maize-sorghum <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g than under<br />

sorghum monoculture (Table 7). Cultivars of either<br />

species <strong>in</strong>tended for use <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

should have a high degree of resistance to<br />

MDM. Sources of <strong>in</strong>oculum, vectors, and the<br />

disease cycle should be studied to develop effective<br />

control strategies.<br />

<strong>Sorghum</strong>-bean <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g has been studied<br />

and recommended, based on socioeconomic<br />

and human nutrition considerations (De Walt<br />

and De Wait 1984; McCulloch and Futreil 1983).<br />

There are no known phytopathological reasons<br />

why sorghum-bean <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g should not be<br />

encouraged. With nutritional, social, and cropprotection<br />

recommendations <strong>in</strong> agreement, it<br />

should prove an excit<strong>in</strong>g system to promote.<br />

Central Americans have practiced <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for many years (Moreno 1985), so adoption<br />

should not be a problem.<br />

Improved cultivars had fewer disease problems<br />

than maicillos when sown <strong>in</strong> postrera, the<br />

last season. In other experiments <strong>in</strong> this study,<br />

maicillos had lower disease severities than improved<br />

cultivars (Fig. 3). Improved cultivars<br />

showed no AW or leaf spot <strong>in</strong>cidence; landrace<br />

cultivars did. In the case of AW, it is likely that<br />

among the improved cvs sown, AW resistance is<br />

the rule rather than the exception. Apparently,<br />

Iandrace cultivars have lower levels of resistance<br />

to this disease; though it is clear that they<br />

can be improved and AW <strong>in</strong>cidence could be<br />

reduced through genetic resistance, much like <strong>in</strong><br />

the improved cultivars.<br />

In the experimental plots mentioned above,<br />

plant densities were higher than <strong>in</strong> farmers'<br />

fields surveyed, and fertilizer application was<br />

almost certa<strong>in</strong>ly higher as well. Those farmers<br />

who adopt the improved varieties <strong>in</strong> place of the<br />

landraces they now use will have to sow at<br />

Table 7. Mean severity of oval and gray leaf spot diseases and <strong>in</strong>cidence (%) of MDMV on sole<br />

sorghum and on sorghum/maize <strong>in</strong>tercrop at Sta. Irene and Sn. Francisco, the Honduras, 1984, and<br />

mean severity of zonate leaf spot at Sta. Irene, the Honduras, 1984.<br />

Mean severity<br />

<strong>Sorghum</strong>/<br />

maize Sole<br />

<strong>Sorghum</strong>/ <strong>in</strong>tercrop Standard sorghum Standard<br />

Location variety Disease (%) deviation (%) deviation<br />

Santa Irene,<br />

Choluteca Peloton Oval 15.6 6.18 29.7 7.12<br />

Gray 5.0 3.88 5.0 2.48<br />

MDMV 1<br />

7.6 7.61 1.7 0.82<br />

Sn. Francisco<br />

Zonate 2.0 2.28 5.5 6.44<br />

1984 Gigante Oval 10.0 7.22 15.1 7.77<br />

Gray 6.8 4.06 7.1 1.88<br />

MDMV 1<br />

25.0 8.86 5.0 7.07<br />

1. Incidence (%).<br />

314

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!