Sorghum Diseases in India
Sorghum Diseases in India
Sorghum Diseases in India
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
population densities for optimum yields, disease<br />
and yield levels could be simultaneously<br />
studied with density traits on all cultivars.<br />
There is a high degree of heterogeneity for a<br />
number of traits <strong>in</strong> maicillos. This gives maicillos<br />
the stability that allows production of some<br />
gra<strong>in</strong>, even under quite unfavorable conditions.<br />
With respect to disease reaction, heterogeneity<br />
<strong>in</strong> a population can slow down epidemic development<br />
(Rob<strong>in</strong>son 1975). As changes are made<br />
<strong>in</strong> maicillos through breed<strong>in</strong>g programs, sufficient<br />
heterogeneity should be ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed. The<br />
more susceptible genotypes can be elim<strong>in</strong>ated,<br />
replac<strong>in</strong>g them with new sources of resistance.<br />
The result<strong>in</strong>g plant population would then have<br />
the orig<strong>in</strong>al sources of resistance (if any), plus<br />
the new ones, and fewer or no extremely susceptible<br />
types.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g of sorghum with maize<br />
seems to reduce the severity of certa<strong>in</strong> foliar diseases;<br />
however, MDM had higher <strong>in</strong>cidence under<br />
maize-sorghum <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g than under<br />
sorghum monoculture (Table 7). Cultivars of either<br />
species <strong>in</strong>tended for use <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
should have a high degree of resistance to<br />
MDM. Sources of <strong>in</strong>oculum, vectors, and the<br />
disease cycle should be studied to develop effective<br />
control strategies.<br />
<strong>Sorghum</strong>-bean <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g has been studied<br />
and recommended, based on socioeconomic<br />
and human nutrition considerations (De Walt<br />
and De Wait 1984; McCulloch and Futreil 1983).<br />
There are no known phytopathological reasons<br />
why sorghum-bean <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g should not be<br />
encouraged. With nutritional, social, and cropprotection<br />
recommendations <strong>in</strong> agreement, it<br />
should prove an excit<strong>in</strong>g system to promote.<br />
Central Americans have practiced <strong>in</strong>tercropp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
for many years (Moreno 1985), so adoption<br />
should not be a problem.<br />
Improved cultivars had fewer disease problems<br />
than maicillos when sown <strong>in</strong> postrera, the<br />
last season. In other experiments <strong>in</strong> this study,<br />
maicillos had lower disease severities than improved<br />
cultivars (Fig. 3). Improved cultivars<br />
showed no AW or leaf spot <strong>in</strong>cidence; landrace<br />
cultivars did. In the case of AW, it is likely that<br />
among the improved cvs sown, AW resistance is<br />
the rule rather than the exception. Apparently,<br />
Iandrace cultivars have lower levels of resistance<br />
to this disease; though it is clear that they<br />
can be improved and AW <strong>in</strong>cidence could be<br />
reduced through genetic resistance, much like <strong>in</strong><br />
the improved cultivars.<br />
In the experimental plots mentioned above,<br />
plant densities were higher than <strong>in</strong> farmers'<br />
fields surveyed, and fertilizer application was<br />
almost certa<strong>in</strong>ly higher as well. Those farmers<br />
who adopt the improved varieties <strong>in</strong> place of the<br />
landraces they now use will have to sow at<br />
Table 7. Mean severity of oval and gray leaf spot diseases and <strong>in</strong>cidence (%) of MDMV on sole<br />
sorghum and on sorghum/maize <strong>in</strong>tercrop at Sta. Irene and Sn. Francisco, the Honduras, 1984, and<br />
mean severity of zonate leaf spot at Sta. Irene, the Honduras, 1984.<br />
Mean severity<br />
<strong>Sorghum</strong>/<br />
maize Sole<br />
<strong>Sorghum</strong>/ <strong>in</strong>tercrop Standard sorghum Standard<br />
Location variety Disease (%) deviation (%) deviation<br />
Santa Irene,<br />
Choluteca Peloton Oval 15.6 6.18 29.7 7.12<br />
Gray 5.0 3.88 5.0 2.48<br />
MDMV 1<br />
7.6 7.61 1.7 0.82<br />
Sn. Francisco<br />
Zonate 2.0 2.28 5.5 6.44<br />
1984 Gigante Oval 10.0 7.22 15.1 7.77<br />
Gray 6.8 4.06 7.1 1.88<br />
MDMV 1<br />
25.0 8.86 5.0 7.07<br />
1. Incidence (%).<br />
314