18.06.2013 Views

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Materials and methods<br />

The 1983 experiment was sown on 27 Aug. The<br />

design was a split plot with six replications.<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong> plot treatments were four sorghum cultivars<br />

(Dorado, Tortillero, Liberal, and Coludo).<br />

Subplot treatments were fungicide-protected<br />

and nonprotected. Ma<strong>in</strong> plots consisted of five<br />

10-m rows, with 0.8 m between rows; subplots<br />

had five 5~m rows. Blocks were separated by<br />

spreader rows. Rows were arranged perpendicular<br />

to prevail<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>d direction.<br />

Fungicide was applied with a backpack<br />

sprayer at 15-day <strong>in</strong>tervals, start<strong>in</strong>g from 22 Sep.<br />

Rates were 1 g benomyl plus 4 g mancozeb plus<br />

0.3 mL surfactant L -1 of solution, applied to<br />

runoff.<br />

Disease-severity rat<strong>in</strong>gs were carried out at<br />

monthly <strong>in</strong>tervals for the upper and lower<br />

leaves. Area under the disease progress curve<br />

(AUDPC) was calculated from upper and lower<br />

leaves, and for the total plant by calculat<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

mean (Wall 1986).<br />

In 1984, the experimental design was<br />

changed to make use of more limited space; this<br />

was a completely randomized design, with two<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

Treated<br />

Nontreated<br />

Cultivar<br />

Figure 2. Yield levels of two landraces and<br />

two improved sorghum cultivars grown dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the 1983 cropp<strong>in</strong>g season <strong>in</strong> La Lujosa,<br />

Choluteca, the Honduras, and affected by zonate<br />

leaf spot disease.<br />

replications and three treatments, consist<strong>in</strong>g of<br />

no fungicide protection, and with fungicide applications<br />

at 15- and 30-day <strong>in</strong>tervals.<br />

Results<br />

In the trial zonate leaf spot caused a reduction <strong>in</strong><br />

yield of nearly 14%. Nonprotected plots averaged<br />

3.37 t ha -1 yield, while those protected from<br />

zonate leaf spot with fungicide averaged 3.92 t<br />

ha -1 (Fig. 2). Disease severity <strong>in</strong> the latter was<br />

considerably reduced. AUDPC for fungicideprotected<br />

plots had a mean value of 310.34,<br />

while the value for nonprotected plots was<br />

993.03. The improved cultivars Dorado and Tortillero<br />

yielded higher than the landraces Coludo<br />

and Liberal, although the improved cultivars<br />

had higher disease severities (Fig. 3).<br />

In 1984, controll<strong>in</strong>g gray leaf spot resulted <strong>in</strong><br />

a significant yield <strong>in</strong>crease of the cv Tortillero.<br />

Without fungicide treatment, this cultivar suffered<br />

a 21% loss of leaf area from gray leaf spot,<br />

and yielded 4.5 t ha- 1 (Table 5). Treated plants<br />

produced 5.6 t ha -1 .<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

Treated<br />

Nontreated<br />

Cultivar<br />

Figure 3. Zonate leaf spot severity levels, as<br />

reflected by the Area under disease progress<br />

curve (AUDPC), on two landraces and two<br />

improved sorghum cultivars treated and nontreated<br />

with fungicidal sprays dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

1983 cropp<strong>in</strong>g season <strong>in</strong> Choluteca, the<br />

Honduras.<br />

309

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!