Sorghum Diseases in India
Sorghum Diseases in India
Sorghum Diseases in India
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
aces has <strong>in</strong>creased concern about transmission<br />
by <strong>in</strong>fected seed.<br />
Sooty stripe (Ramulispora sorghi) is common<br />
under warm, humid conditions <strong>in</strong> some countries.<br />
The pathogen survives as sclerotia. Seed<br />
<strong>in</strong>fection has been detected (Lele et al. 1966), but<br />
proof of transmission is lack<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Target leaf spot (Bipolaris sorghicola) survives<br />
on debris or on alternate hosts. It has been isolated<br />
from seeds (Purss 1953).<br />
Charcoal rot (Macrophom<strong>in</strong>a phaseol<strong>in</strong>a) is a<br />
major disease <strong>in</strong> drier regions. It is reported as<br />
seedborne, but soilborne sclerotia are the major<br />
<strong>in</strong>oculum sources. One report (Chumaevskaya<br />
1962) recommended seed treatment.<br />
Milo disease (Periconia circ<strong>in</strong>ata), occurs <strong>in</strong> USA,<br />
caus<strong>in</strong>g a root and crown rot <strong>in</strong> some genotypes.<br />
Crop residues and soil are well recognized as the<br />
major <strong>in</strong>oculum sources, and it has been isolated<br />
from seeds (Hans<strong>in</strong>g and Hartley 1962).<br />
Zonate leaf spot (Gloeocercospora sorghi) commonly<br />
occurs dur<strong>in</strong>g wet periods. It is seedborne<br />
(Ba<strong>in</strong> 1950). Ciccarone (1949) suggested<br />
that zonate leaf spot was <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong>to Venezuela<br />
by <strong>in</strong>fected seeds. Sclerotia overw<strong>in</strong>ter<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> dead leaf tissues provide <strong>in</strong>oculum for the<br />
follow<strong>in</strong>g season's crop (Girard 1978).<br />
Fusarium root and stalk rot (Fusarium moniliforme)<br />
is a common disease <strong>in</strong> tropical and<br />
temperate regions. Locally, losses may approach<br />
100%. Infected debris is the ma<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>oculum<br />
source. Seed can be a m<strong>in</strong>or source (Mathur et<br />
al. 1967). Control can best be achieved by sow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
hybrids with good stalk strength and then manag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
so as to avoid or reduce stress.<br />
Bacterial leaf spot (Pseudomonas syr<strong>in</strong>gae pv<br />
syr<strong>in</strong>gae) has been reported from most countries.<br />
The pathogen survives on crop residues, and<br />
can survive for as long as 3 years <strong>in</strong> dry sorghum<br />
seeds. Sundaram (1980) <strong>in</strong>dicated that<br />
sow<strong>in</strong>gs with seed from diseased plants, grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> sterile soil, developed the disease.<br />
Other bacterial pathogens of sorghum recorded<br />
as be<strong>in</strong>g seedborne are Pseudomonas<br />
andropogonis, Xanthomonas holcicola, and X. rubrisorghi<br />
(Easwaran 1967; Sundaram 1980).<br />
Nonpathogenic seedborne microorganisms<br />
Many studies of the seed microflora of sorghum<br />
have been reported, usually as lists of microorganisms<br />
detected <strong>in</strong> seed-health tests. Many of<br />
these microorganisms are pathogens, such as<br />
Fusarium spp and Curvularia spp, but pathogenic<br />
activity for the majority has not been established.<br />
Papers by Mathur et al. (1975), Hans<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and Hartley (1962), P<strong>in</strong>heiro and Neto (1979),<br />
Rani et al. (1978), Tarr (1962), and Williams and<br />
Rao (1981) reflect the range of genera found <strong>in</strong><br />
different parts of the world.<br />
Pathogens affect<strong>in</strong>g seed quality<br />
The exposed nature of sorghum seeds render<br />
them susceptible to <strong>in</strong>vasion by parasitic microorganisms<br />
and to effects of weather<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the<br />
production field (Frederiksen et al. 1982). Moldy<br />
seed shows as p<strong>in</strong>k or blackened seed scattered<br />
through the head. Dead embryos are characteristic<br />
of the condition (Williams and Rao 1981).<br />
Wet weather dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1966 harvest caused extensive<br />
losses from gra<strong>in</strong> mold and weather<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> Texas (Matocha et al. 1977). Three diseases,<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> mold, small seed, and head blight, are all<br />
associated with reduced seed and gra<strong>in</strong> quality.<br />
The fungus Fusarium moniliforme is implicated <strong>in</strong><br />
each of these.<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> mold is the result of <strong>in</strong>fection of spikelets,<br />
perhaps as early as anthesis, by F. moniliforme<br />
and Curvularia lunata. The pathway of<br />
<strong>in</strong>fection of the seed by F. moniliforme has been<br />
elucidated by Castor (1981). This work dist<strong>in</strong>guished<br />
primary pathogenic effects from secondary<br />
effects associated with field weather<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
In the latter case, fungi colonize mature gra<strong>in</strong><br />
(Castor 1981). There is value <strong>in</strong> these dist<strong>in</strong>ctions;<br />
they are important <strong>in</strong> screen<strong>in</strong>g sorghum<br />
l<strong>in</strong>es for resistance to <strong>in</strong>fection by F. moniliforme.<br />
L<strong>in</strong>es that consistently develop less gra<strong>in</strong> mold<br />
have been identified (Frederiksen et al 1982).<br />
"Small seed" occurs, to some extent, <strong>in</strong> sorghum<br />
each year. Castor (1981) showed that <strong>in</strong>fection<br />
at anthesis by F. moniliforme or C. lunata<br />
causes formation of a false black layer, result<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> light gra<strong>in</strong>. Inoculation with F. moniliforme<br />
<strong>in</strong>duced "small seed.''<br />
Head blight, caused by F. moniliforme, differs<br />
from gra<strong>in</strong> mold <strong>in</strong> that it is the result of <strong>in</strong>fection<br />
of the panicle, rachis branches, or peduncle.<br />
Gra<strong>in</strong> mold, on the other hand, is a result of<br />
spikelet <strong>in</strong>fection. Major losses were caused by<br />
head blight <strong>in</strong> southern Texas <strong>in</strong> 1979 (Castor<br />
and Frederiksen 1980). <strong>Sorghum</strong> genotypes differ<br />
<strong>in</strong> their response to this disease.<br />
299