18.06.2013 Views

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

poll<strong>in</strong>ation (Patil and Goud 1980), Clearly histological<br />

studies upon simultaneous <strong>in</strong>oculation<br />

and poll<strong>in</strong>ation, to trace the progress of pollen<br />

tube and <strong>in</strong>fection hyphae to determ<strong>in</strong>e if fertilized<br />

ovaries can be colonized/would be valuable.<br />

The susceptible period of spikelets, or what<br />

has been termed as the 'w<strong>in</strong>dow of <strong>in</strong>fection' <strong>in</strong><br />

pearl millet ergot (Will<strong>in</strong>gdale et al. 1986), beg<strong>in</strong>s<br />

when stigma become receptive and ends (most<br />

likely) when the ovary is fertilized. Any factor<br />

that prolongs the susceptible period predisposes<br />

sorghum to ergot <strong>in</strong>fection. Conversely, factors<br />

that ensure rapid fertilization would serve to reduce<br />

ergot attack. For example, protogynous<br />

spikelets of male-fertile plants would be more<br />

susceptible than spikelets <strong>in</strong> which anthers and<br />

stigma emerge together, because stigma would<br />

rema<strong>in</strong> unpoll<strong>in</strong>ated but receptive to conidia<br />

longer.<br />

Male sterility promotes ergot <strong>in</strong>fection because<br />

viable pollen is not produced (Futrell and<br />

Webster 1965). The utility of readily available<br />

fertile pollen <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g ergot severity has been<br />

shown <strong>in</strong> pearl millet ergot (Thakur and Williams<br />

1980; Thakur et al. 1983). Conidia germ<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

is reduced on sorghum stigma poll<strong>in</strong>ated by<br />

viable pollen (Ch<strong>in</strong>nadurai et al. 1970a).<br />

Environmental factors<br />

Favorable environmental conditions for <strong>in</strong>fection<br />

and disease development should co<strong>in</strong>cide<br />

with anthesis. Futrell and Webster (1966) reported<br />

that near 100% relative humidity for 24 h<br />

dur<strong>in</strong>g anthesis of a male-sterile l<strong>in</strong>e was optimal<br />

for <strong>in</strong>fection. Molefe (1975) reported that <strong>in</strong>oculated<br />

panicles held for 20 hours at high<br />

humidity and at 20°C and 25°C, but not at 40°C,<br />

showed honeydew with<strong>in</strong> 7 days. From field experiments,<br />

Anahosur and Patil (1982) concluded<br />

that m<strong>in</strong>imum temperatures rang<strong>in</strong>g from .19° to<br />

21 °C and relative humidity from 67 to 84% dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the 10-day period follow<strong>in</strong>g panicle emergence<br />

from boot leaf is sufficient to favor serious<br />

ergot <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong> a male-sterile. Temperature<br />

and relative humidity are also reported to affect<br />

the <strong>in</strong>cubation period (Sangitrao and Bade<br />

1979a).<br />

In Botswana, Molefe (1975) observed 25-90%<br />

ergot <strong>in</strong>cidence, presumably on male-fertile<br />

l<strong>in</strong>es under natural conditions, only <strong>in</strong> a year<br />

238<br />

characterized by high ra<strong>in</strong>fall (750 mm for the<br />

epidemic grow<strong>in</strong>g season). Infected panicles<br />

flowered when relative humidity was 90%, m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

temperature 14°C, and maximum temperature<br />

27°C Cloud<strong>in</strong>ess dur<strong>in</strong>g anthesis aids<br />

disease development (Anahosur and Patil 1982).<br />

Sangitrao and Bade (1979a) felt that <strong>in</strong> conditions<br />

of high humidity, ra<strong>in</strong>fall is not essential<br />

for ergot development. Their conclusions are<br />

from experiments <strong>in</strong> which abundant <strong>in</strong>oculum<br />

was available <strong>in</strong> other plots sown nearby.<br />

Much of the present knowledge on how environmental<br />

factors affect ergot development is<br />

mostly hypothetical and lack<strong>in</strong>g experimental<br />

evidence. Environmental conditions such as<br />

cloudy weather and wetness (ra<strong>in</strong>fall) affect anther<br />

dehiscence, pollen viability, pollen deposition,<br />

and pollen activity (Qu<strong>in</strong>by 1958). Ovule<br />

abortion and pollen sterility can occur due to<br />

abnormal mega-sporogenesis and microsporogenesis<br />

at 5-21°C (Brook<strong>in</strong>g 1979; Dhopte 1984).<br />

These conditions are likely to enhance ergot severity<br />

because poll<strong>in</strong>ation and fertilization are<br />

delayed or reduced.<br />

Environmental factors, ma<strong>in</strong>ly through their<br />

effects on fungal saprophytes, affect sclerotial<br />

development. Sclerotia develop poorly <strong>in</strong> the<br />

ra<strong>in</strong>y season due to the growth of Cerebella (Sangitrao<br />

and Bade 1979b), but wet conditions congenial<br />

for <strong>in</strong>fection followed by sclerotial development<br />

<strong>in</strong> dry weather allow formation of less<br />

contam<strong>in</strong>ated mature sclerotia (Futrell and<br />

Webster 1966).<br />

Research to expla<strong>in</strong> the relationship of sorghum<br />

flower<strong>in</strong>g biology to ergot development is<br />

needed. Precise <strong>in</strong>formation on epidemiology is<br />

required, not only for male-sterile l<strong>in</strong>es on which<br />

ergot is usually more severe, but on male-fertile<br />

hybrids and varieties as well. Future epidemiological<br />

studies should consider altered floral<br />

behavior of the host and its effect on pathogen<br />

development result<strong>in</strong>g from changes <strong>in</strong> environment.<br />

Disease cycle<br />

Primary <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>in</strong> the field is probably established<br />

by conidia from collateral hosts and <strong>in</strong>fected<br />

panicle debris <strong>in</strong> soil (Futrell and Webster<br />

1966), Ascospores may also serve as primary <strong>in</strong>oculum<br />

(S<strong>in</strong>gh, 1964), but proof is lack<strong>in</strong>g. Conidia<br />

<strong>in</strong> dried honeydew <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fected panicles that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!