Sorghum Diseases in India
Sorghum Diseases in India
Sorghum Diseases in India
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ales and Frederiksen (1979) reported that many<br />
of the resistant sorghum entries <strong>in</strong> Georgia were<br />
susceptible <strong>in</strong> Brazil; but Redlan, a traditionally<br />
susceptible entry <strong>in</strong> Georgia, was resistant <strong>in</strong><br />
Brazil, Nakamura (1982) identified five races of<br />
C. gram<strong>in</strong>icola us<strong>in</strong>g seven differential sorghum<br />
cultivars (Tx 2536, Mart<strong>in</strong>, TAM 428, Tx 430,<br />
Brandes, SC 170-6-17, SC 175-14). Ferreira and<br />
Casela (1986) identified seven races of C gram<strong>in</strong>icola<br />
us<strong>in</strong>g 13 differential cultivars of sorghum<br />
(Tx 2536, Mart<strong>in</strong>, TAM 428, Tx 430, Brandes, SC<br />
170-6-17, SC 175-14, SC 112-14, Theis, Reis, Redlan,<br />
SC 326-6, and SC 283). The seven isolates<br />
used <strong>in</strong> their study were collected from different<br />
locations <strong>in</strong> Brazil. Ali and Warren (1987) identified<br />
three races of C. gram<strong>in</strong>icola us<strong>in</strong>g six differential<br />
cultivars (IS 4225, IS 8361, 954130, 954062,<br />
Br 64, and 954206). The three races were identified<br />
from n<strong>in</strong>e isolates of G gram<strong>in</strong>icola obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
from Florida, Georgia, Puerto Rico, and <strong>India</strong>na.<br />
They also reported the different races even<br />
among isolates from the same area. The existence<br />
of races among pathogen populations present<br />
challeng<strong>in</strong>g problems to breeders and<br />
pathologists try<strong>in</strong>g to develop resistant cvs.<br />
Casela and Ferreira (In press) have proposed<br />
a system of nomenclature of races of C. gram<strong>in</strong>icola<br />
<strong>in</strong> Brazil. In this system, three sorghum<br />
cultivars (Redlan, SC 326-6, SC 283) are used to<br />
separate eight groups of races, then sorghum<br />
cultivars Tx 623, Brandes, SC 112-14, Mart<strong>in</strong>, Tx<br />
2536, and Theis are used to dist<strong>in</strong>guish 32 races<br />
with<strong>in</strong> each group.<br />
Economic importance<br />
<strong>Sorghum</strong> anthracnose may limit gra<strong>in</strong> sorghum<br />
production <strong>in</strong> the humid southeastern USA<br />
(Harris et al. 1964; Harris and Sowell 1970), Lat<strong>in</strong><br />
America, Brazil, and Venezuela (Pastor-Corrales<br />
and Frederiksen 1979), and other humid tropical<br />
and subtropical areas (Bergquist 1973; Powell et<br />
al. 1977).<br />
Losses <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield were estimated to exceed<br />
50% on susceptible sorghum cultivars <strong>in</strong> a<br />
severe anthracnose epiphytotic <strong>in</strong> Georgia<br />
(Harris et al. 1964). They reported a negative (r =<br />
-0.632) and highly significant (P = 0.01) correlation<br />
between gra<strong>in</strong> yield and leaf anthracnose<br />
rat<strong>in</strong>g. Highly significant (P = 0.01) negative correlations<br />
between gra<strong>in</strong> yield and leaf, head, and<br />
stalk anthracnose rat<strong>in</strong>gs were reported. In these<br />
studies, leaf anthracnose and stalk rot were <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
of each other, but the head <strong>in</strong>fection<br />
was associated with both the leaf and stalk<br />
phases of the disease. Powell et al. (1977) reported<br />
that gra<strong>in</strong> yield was reduced by 70% and<br />
more than half the yield loss resulted from <strong>in</strong>complete<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> fill as verified by 42% decrease <strong>in</strong><br />
1000-seed mass and 17.2% decrease <strong>in</strong> seed density.<br />
Early seed abortion's role <strong>in</strong> yield reduction<br />
was also suggested to be important. Gorbet<br />
(1977) reported that gra<strong>in</strong> production of susceptible<br />
sorghum cultivars is severely limited when<br />
the disease develops dur<strong>in</strong>g head<strong>in</strong>g or early<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g. Correlation coefficients between<br />
anthracnose severity and gra<strong>in</strong> yield <strong>in</strong> 42 sorghum<br />
hybrids were negative and highly significant<br />
for all disease rat<strong>in</strong>g dates; however, the r 2<br />
values decreased as gra<strong>in</strong> developed from the<br />
milk stage to harvest (Harris and Fisher 1974).<br />
The percentage loss <strong>in</strong> sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield varied<br />
from 1.2 to 16.4, depend<strong>in</strong>g upon anthracnose<br />
severity (Mishra and Siradhana 1979).<br />
Luttrel (1950) reported that serious yield losses<br />
may not occur if leaf symptoms do not appear<br />
until after the plants mature. Ali et al. (1987)<br />
reported that highly significant (P = 0.01) positive<br />
correlations between percentage loss <strong>in</strong><br />
gra<strong>in</strong> yield and anthracnose leaf blight (ALB)<br />
severity <strong>in</strong>dex occurred <strong>in</strong> 1984 and 1985 and for<br />
the pooled data of both years, with correlation<br />
coefficients of 0.86, 0.84, and 0.85, respectively.<br />
Correlations between percentage loss <strong>in</strong> 1000seed<br />
mass and ALB severity also were highly<br />
significant (P = 0.01) for the <strong>in</strong>dividual and<br />
pooled data of both years. The highly significant<br />
(P = 0.01) positive correlations between percentage<br />
loss <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield and percentage loss <strong>in</strong><br />
1000-seed mass <strong>in</strong>dicate that ALB reduces gra<strong>in</strong><br />
yield of sorghum largely by decreas<strong>in</strong>g seed<br />
mass. They also reported a loss <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield of<br />
about 30% <strong>in</strong> the most-susceptible sorghum cultivar.<br />
They suggested that the amount of loss <strong>in</strong><br />
gra<strong>in</strong> yield due to ALB was <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the<br />
aggressiveness of the pathogen, sorghum genotype,<br />
and environmental conditions favor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
anthracnose development.<br />
The extent of damage of loss due to anthracnose<br />
stalk rot has been reported as a reflection of<br />
the host susceptibility, environment, aggressiveness<br />
of the pathogen, and physiological status of<br />
the host (Frederiksen 1984).<br />
205