18.06.2013 Views

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ales and Frederiksen (1979) reported that many<br />

of the resistant sorghum entries <strong>in</strong> Georgia were<br />

susceptible <strong>in</strong> Brazil; but Redlan, a traditionally<br />

susceptible entry <strong>in</strong> Georgia, was resistant <strong>in</strong><br />

Brazil, Nakamura (1982) identified five races of<br />

C. gram<strong>in</strong>icola us<strong>in</strong>g seven differential sorghum<br />

cultivars (Tx 2536, Mart<strong>in</strong>, TAM 428, Tx 430,<br />

Brandes, SC 170-6-17, SC 175-14). Ferreira and<br />

Casela (1986) identified seven races of C gram<strong>in</strong>icola<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g 13 differential cultivars of sorghum<br />

(Tx 2536, Mart<strong>in</strong>, TAM 428, Tx 430, Brandes, SC<br />

170-6-17, SC 175-14, SC 112-14, Theis, Reis, Redlan,<br />

SC 326-6, and SC 283). The seven isolates<br />

used <strong>in</strong> their study were collected from different<br />

locations <strong>in</strong> Brazil. Ali and Warren (1987) identified<br />

three races of C. gram<strong>in</strong>icola us<strong>in</strong>g six differential<br />

cultivars (IS 4225, IS 8361, 954130, 954062,<br />

Br 64, and 954206). The three races were identified<br />

from n<strong>in</strong>e isolates of G gram<strong>in</strong>icola obta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

from Florida, Georgia, Puerto Rico, and <strong>India</strong>na.<br />

They also reported the different races even<br />

among isolates from the same area. The existence<br />

of races among pathogen populations present<br />

challeng<strong>in</strong>g problems to breeders and<br />

pathologists try<strong>in</strong>g to develop resistant cvs.<br />

Casela and Ferreira (In press) have proposed<br />

a system of nomenclature of races of C. gram<strong>in</strong>icola<br />

<strong>in</strong> Brazil. In this system, three sorghum<br />

cultivars (Redlan, SC 326-6, SC 283) are used to<br />

separate eight groups of races, then sorghum<br />

cultivars Tx 623, Brandes, SC 112-14, Mart<strong>in</strong>, Tx<br />

2536, and Theis are used to dist<strong>in</strong>guish 32 races<br />

with<strong>in</strong> each group.<br />

Economic importance<br />

<strong>Sorghum</strong> anthracnose may limit gra<strong>in</strong> sorghum<br />

production <strong>in</strong> the humid southeastern USA<br />

(Harris et al. 1964; Harris and Sowell 1970), Lat<strong>in</strong><br />

America, Brazil, and Venezuela (Pastor-Corrales<br />

and Frederiksen 1979), and other humid tropical<br />

and subtropical areas (Bergquist 1973; Powell et<br />

al. 1977).<br />

Losses <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield were estimated to exceed<br />

50% on susceptible sorghum cultivars <strong>in</strong> a<br />

severe anthracnose epiphytotic <strong>in</strong> Georgia<br />

(Harris et al. 1964). They reported a negative (r =<br />

-0.632) and highly significant (P = 0.01) correlation<br />

between gra<strong>in</strong> yield and leaf anthracnose<br />

rat<strong>in</strong>g. Highly significant (P = 0.01) negative correlations<br />

between gra<strong>in</strong> yield and leaf, head, and<br />

stalk anthracnose rat<strong>in</strong>gs were reported. In these<br />

studies, leaf anthracnose and stalk rot were <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

of each other, but the head <strong>in</strong>fection<br />

was associated with both the leaf and stalk<br />

phases of the disease. Powell et al. (1977) reported<br />

that gra<strong>in</strong> yield was reduced by 70% and<br />

more than half the yield loss resulted from <strong>in</strong>complete<br />

gra<strong>in</strong> fill as verified by 42% decrease <strong>in</strong><br />

1000-seed mass and 17.2% decrease <strong>in</strong> seed density.<br />

Early seed abortion's role <strong>in</strong> yield reduction<br />

was also suggested to be important. Gorbet<br />

(1977) reported that gra<strong>in</strong> production of susceptible<br />

sorghum cultivars is severely limited when<br />

the disease develops dur<strong>in</strong>g head<strong>in</strong>g or early<br />

gra<strong>in</strong> fill<strong>in</strong>g. Correlation coefficients between<br />

anthracnose severity and gra<strong>in</strong> yield <strong>in</strong> 42 sorghum<br />

hybrids were negative and highly significant<br />

for all disease rat<strong>in</strong>g dates; however, the r 2<br />

values decreased as gra<strong>in</strong> developed from the<br />

milk stage to harvest (Harris and Fisher 1974).<br />

The percentage loss <strong>in</strong> sorghum gra<strong>in</strong> yield varied<br />

from 1.2 to 16.4, depend<strong>in</strong>g upon anthracnose<br />

severity (Mishra and Siradhana 1979).<br />

Luttrel (1950) reported that serious yield losses<br />

may not occur if leaf symptoms do not appear<br />

until after the plants mature. Ali et al. (1987)<br />

reported that highly significant (P = 0.01) positive<br />

correlations between percentage loss <strong>in</strong><br />

gra<strong>in</strong> yield and anthracnose leaf blight (ALB)<br />

severity <strong>in</strong>dex occurred <strong>in</strong> 1984 and 1985 and for<br />

the pooled data of both years, with correlation<br />

coefficients of 0.86, 0.84, and 0.85, respectively.<br />

Correlations between percentage loss <strong>in</strong> 1000seed<br />

mass and ALB severity also were highly<br />

significant (P = 0.01) for the <strong>in</strong>dividual and<br />

pooled data of both years. The highly significant<br />

(P = 0.01) positive correlations between percentage<br />

loss <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield and percentage loss <strong>in</strong><br />

1000-seed mass <strong>in</strong>dicate that ALB reduces gra<strong>in</strong><br />

yield of sorghum largely by decreas<strong>in</strong>g seed<br />

mass. They also reported a loss <strong>in</strong> gra<strong>in</strong> yield of<br />

about 30% <strong>in</strong> the most-susceptible sorghum cultivar.<br />

They suggested that the amount of loss <strong>in</strong><br />

gra<strong>in</strong> yield due to ALB was <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the<br />

aggressiveness of the pathogen, sorghum genotype,<br />

and environmental conditions favor<strong>in</strong>g<br />

anthracnose development.<br />

The extent of damage of loss due to anthracnose<br />

stalk rot has been reported as a reflection of<br />

the host susceptibility, environment, aggressiveness<br />

of the pathogen, and physiological status of<br />

the host (Frederiksen 1984).<br />

205

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!