Sorghum Diseases in India
Sorghum Diseases in India
Sorghum Diseases in India
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
leaf-disease resistance (polygenic) perhaps coupled,<br />
where needed, with pathogen-specific<br />
(monogenic or oligogenic) resistance has been<br />
successful <strong>in</strong> other crops and might be a valuable<br />
approach with sorghum (Hooker and Perk<strong>in</strong>s<br />
1980). <strong>Sorghum</strong>s with the "stay-green" or<br />
nonsenescent characters (Duncan 1984; Rosenow<br />
1984) may be valuable sources for general<br />
leaf-disease resistance.<br />
<strong>Sorghum</strong> breeders often treat sorghum as a<br />
self-poll<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g crop which is most amenable to<br />
identification of monogenic resistance, while<br />
population breed<strong>in</strong>g—be<strong>in</strong>g dependent on both<br />
self- and cross-poll<strong>in</strong>ation—is useful <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g<br />
monogenic and polygenic sources of resistance.<br />
Frederiksen and Rosenow (1986) suggest<br />
that resistance traits should be present at levels<br />
that can be readily evaluated and they must be<br />
heritable and stable across environments- They<br />
state that progress <strong>in</strong> disease-resistance breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />
can be made us<strong>in</strong>g several methods, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
pedigree l<strong>in</strong>e breed<strong>in</strong>g, backcross breed<strong>in</strong>g,<br />
and population breed<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Resistance (monogenic or polygenic) that reduces<br />
the rate of disease development aga<strong>in</strong>st all<br />
races of a pathogen effectively is especially<br />
needed for pathogens with known races (Frederiksen<br />
and Rosenow 1986). This type of resistance<br />
may also reduce selection pressure for<br />
variants of other foliar pathogens. General or<br />
durable resistance conferred by many genes can<br />
have several additive and synergistic effects <strong>in</strong><br />
host response to pathogens but their collective<br />
response under disease-conducive environments<br />
is the important factor and more easily<br />
measured.<br />
The world collections of landrace and other<br />
sorghums represent a vast and diverse resource<br />
conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g all types of resistances to many foliar<br />
and other pathogens. Scientists have already<br />
identified a large number of elite disease-resistant<br />
materials and they are be<strong>in</strong>g used and evaluated<br />
<strong>in</strong> sorghum programs around the world.<br />
Yet, this represents only a small proportion of<br />
what is available.<br />
There are a multitude of germplasm-screen<strong>in</strong>g<br />
techniques that range from fully natural disease<br />
development <strong>in</strong> the field to strictly<br />
controlled pathogen and environment conditions<br />
<strong>in</strong> the greenhouse and laboratory (Sharma<br />
1980; Williams et al. 1980; Frederiksen and<br />
Frankl<strong>in</strong> 1980). Mughogho (1982) stated that no<br />
screen<strong>in</strong>g techniques were available for sooty<br />
stripe and gray leaf spot. This was due largely to<br />
the lack of laboratory techniques to mass produce<br />
conidia for greenhouse or field <strong>in</strong>oculation.<br />
Odvody (1981) developed a sporulation technique<br />
for Cercospora sorghi that was successfully<br />
utilized <strong>in</strong> germplasm screen<strong>in</strong>g by Wall (1983).<br />
Ramulispora sorghi sporulates <strong>in</strong> almost a yeastlike<br />
fashion on potato dextrose agar if <strong>in</strong>cubated<br />
under a cont<strong>in</strong>uous source of longwave UV light<br />
(Odvody, unpublished). The conidia can be serially<br />
transferred and streaked, as with bacteria,<br />
onto media for mass production.<br />
Other Disease Controls<br />
Destruction of <strong>in</strong>fested host debris<br />
The ecology of foliar pathogens is of considerable<br />
<strong>in</strong>fluence on how cultural practices and<br />
farm<strong>in</strong>g systems affect the <strong>in</strong>cidence of specific<br />
diseases. Most foliar pathogens of sorghum are<br />
favored by tillage that permits pathogen survival<br />
<strong>in</strong> surface host-residue lesions. Control by<br />
m<strong>in</strong>imalization of host residues is more effective<br />
with some pathogens than others. Pathogens<br />
dissem<strong>in</strong>ated primarily by w<strong>in</strong>d, like E. turcicum,<br />
can more easily overcome distance limitations<br />
imposed by such practices (Frederiksen<br />
1986). Those pathogens surviv<strong>in</strong>g as sclerotia <strong>in</strong><br />
soil, e.g., R. sorghi, may be long-lived <strong>in</strong> the soil<br />
but the more rapid destruction of lesion debris<br />
<strong>in</strong>creases the exposure of sclerotia to the deleterious<br />
soil microenvironment. Colletotrichum<br />
gram<strong>in</strong>icola survives only <strong>in</strong> host debris, but its<br />
ability to attack more than one plant organ compensates<br />
somewhat for that dependency.<br />
Destruction of collateral hosts<br />
Pucc<strong>in</strong>ia purpurea, a w<strong>in</strong>d-dissem<strong>in</strong>ated pathogen,<br />
must survive on a liv<strong>in</strong>g host. Destruction<br />
of collateral hosts may at times be an effective<br />
control for P. purpurea and several other pathogens,<br />
but this practice is often impractical except<br />
<strong>in</strong> the proximity of field areas.<br />
Crop rotation and disease escape<br />
Crop rotations are especially effective where<br />
pathogen survival is dependent on debris, but<br />
173