18.06.2013 Views

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

Sorghum Diseases in India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and occurred more often at the leaf tips, suggest<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that hydathodes may be a portal of entry for<br />

the bacteria. We did not detect bacterial leaf<br />

blight symptoms on maize or sorghum <strong>in</strong> Nigeria,<br />

even when these crops were grow<strong>in</strong>g adjacent<br />

to or <strong>in</strong>tersown with pearl millet.<br />

Epidemiology of P. avenue<br />

In growth chamber studies, bacterial leaf blight<br />

was favored by hot (36/24°C) and moist conditions<br />

(90% RH) (Akhtar and Clafl<strong>in</strong> 1986a). In<br />

Kansas, P. andropogonis and P. avenae were capable<br />

of overw<strong>in</strong>ter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>fested plant debris<br />

(Akhtar and Clafl<strong>in</strong> 1986b). Leaf and stalk tissue<br />

and seeds were exam<strong>in</strong>ed by fluorescent antibody<br />

sta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g (FAS) for bacteria every 2 weeks<br />

from February through May. More bacteria were<br />

observed <strong>in</strong> leaf tissue than <strong>in</strong> stalk tissue or <strong>in</strong><br />

seed samples. Neither of the bacteria species<br />

was recovered from seed samples plated on<br />

YDCA medium, whereas the pathogens were<br />

easily recovered from stalk and leaf tissue.<br />

Effect of sorghum growth stage on bacterial<br />

stripe and bacterial leaf blight development<br />

Three plants from each row of 26 gra<strong>in</strong> sorghum<br />

hybrids (four replications) were <strong>in</strong>oculated with<br />

P. andropogonis and P. avenae at 30, 40,50, and 90<br />

days after sow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1982 and 30 to 40 days <strong>in</strong><br />

1983 (Akhtar and Clafl<strong>in</strong>, unpublished). This approximated,<br />

respectively, Stage 3 (grow<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

differentiation: seven to ten leaves), Stage 4 (flag<br />

leaf visible <strong>in</strong> whorl), Stage 5 (boot), and Stage 9<br />

(physiological maturity). Although our data (Table<br />

3) showed Stage 9 to have the highest read<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

it is probably important <strong>in</strong> most years that<br />

plants be <strong>in</strong>oculated prior to Stage 5. Climatic<br />

conditions <strong>in</strong> 1982 were optimal for disease development.<br />

In 1983, however, periods of hot and<br />

dry conditions persisted and limited disease<br />

was observed. Timely ra<strong>in</strong>fall, warm temperatures,<br />

overcast skies, and frequent dews after <strong>in</strong>oculation<br />

appear vital for extensive disease<br />

development.<br />

Table 3. Effect of <strong>in</strong>oculat<strong>in</strong>g gra<strong>in</strong> sorghum<br />

plants at various growth stages with Pseudomonas<br />

andropogonis and P. avenue. 1<br />

Table 3. Effect of <strong>in</strong>oculat<strong>in</strong>g gra<strong>in</strong> sorghum<br />

plants at various growth stages with Pseudomonas<br />

andropogonis and P. avenue. 1<br />

Table 3. Effect of <strong>in</strong>oculat<strong>in</strong>g gra<strong>in</strong> sorghum<br />

plants at various growth stages with Pseudomonas<br />

andropogonis and P. avenue. 1<br />

Growth<br />

stage 2<br />

P. andropogonis P, avenae<br />

1982 1983 1982 1983<br />

3 2,45 3 b 4 1.76 a 1.39 a 1.09 a<br />

4 1.97 c 1.11b 1.01 b 0.20 b<br />

5 1.51 d 1.04 b<br />

9 2.84 a 1.25 a<br />

1. Source: Akhtar and Clafl<strong>in</strong>, unpublished.<br />

2. Growth stages: 3 = grow<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t differentiation<br />

(7-10 leaves); 4 = flag leaf visible; 5 = boot stage; 9 =<br />

physiological maturity.<br />

3. Rat<strong>in</strong>g scale of 0-5, where 0 = no symptoms; 1 = 1-<br />

10; 2 = 11-25; 3 = 26-50; 4 - 51-75; 5 = 76-100% of<br />

leaf area affected. Each number represents an average<br />

of 3 plants of 26 hybrids <strong>in</strong>oculated at each<br />

stage of growth.<br />

4. Numbers with<strong>in</strong> a column not followed by a common<br />

letter are significantly different at the 0.05 level<br />

as determ<strong>in</strong>ed by Duncan's Multiple Range Test.<br />

Bacterial Spot<br />

Causal organism<br />

P. syr<strong>in</strong>gae cells are aerobic, gram-negative rods<br />

measur<strong>in</strong>g 0.5-0.7 x 0.8-2.2 µm. The cells are<br />

motile with one or more polar flagella. P. syr<strong>in</strong>gae<br />

produces a green fluorescent pigment on<br />

KB. The bacterium does not hydrolyze starch;<br />

catalase and aescul<strong>in</strong> tests are positive whereas<br />

oxidase and <strong>in</strong>dole production are negative.<br />

Acid is produced from glucose, fructose, sucrose,<br />

galactose, mannose, arab<strong>in</strong>ose, xylose,<br />

mannitol, glycerol, and sorbitol. Optimum<br />

growth temperature is near 28 °C; maximum is<br />

35 °C and m<strong>in</strong>imum is 1 °C (Hayward and Waterston<br />

1965).<br />

Host range<br />

Numerous monocot and dicot hosts, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

many genera from the Gram<strong>in</strong>ae family, are susceptible.<br />

P. syr<strong>in</strong>gae is dissem<strong>in</strong>ated over long<br />

distances by seed and plant debris. Bacterial<br />

spot <strong>in</strong>cidence is <strong>in</strong>creased by cool weather, ra<strong>in</strong>,<br />

143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!