Sorghum Diseases in India
Sorghum Diseases in India
Sorghum Diseases in India
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Experimental feed<strong>in</strong>g of the suspected toxigenic<br />
material to pregnant and lactat<strong>in</strong>g sows clearly<br />
implicated the ergot sclerotia, contam<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
gra<strong>in</strong> at the rate of approximately 1-2%, <strong>in</strong> reproductive<br />
failure due not to any detectable effect<br />
on the foetus <strong>in</strong> utero, but to <strong>in</strong>hibited<br />
mammary function lead<strong>in</strong>g quickly to starvation<br />
of normal piglets born at normal term. Evidence<br />
of peripheral vascular disturbance, commonly<br />
associated with the classical ergot fungus of<br />
temperate cereals and grasses (Claviceps purpurea)<br />
was never expressed.<br />
Most of the pharmacological properties of ergot<br />
sclerotia (Claviceps spp) can be attributed to<br />
the ergolene alkaloids derived biosynthetically<br />
from a common pathway of secondary metabolism<br />
commenc<strong>in</strong>g with the condensation of tryptophan<br />
with the isoprene precursor dimethylallyl<br />
prophosphate. Claviceps purpurea elaborates<br />
the most complex derivatives of lysergic acid,<br />
but C. fusiformis completes only part of the pathway,<br />
the clav<strong>in</strong>e alkaloids, agroclav<strong>in</strong>e and<br />
elymoclav<strong>in</strong>e accumulat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stead as endproducts<br />
occurr<strong>in</strong>g at about 0.3% (w/w) of the<br />
sclerotial tissue and as trace amounts even <strong>in</strong> the<br />
honeydew exudate associated with sphacelial<br />
fructification. Pure alkaloids of this type, extracted<br />
from sclerotia grown on pearl millet or produced<br />
by the fungus <strong>in</strong> fermentation, exhibit<br />
negligible peripheral pharmacology but are<br />
potent central stimulators (Mantle 1968a). For<br />
example, mice given daily approximately 0.5 mg<br />
agroclav<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> food became obsessively hyperactive,<br />
tear<strong>in</strong>g blott<strong>in</strong>g paper on which they<br />
were bedded <strong>in</strong>to m<strong>in</strong>ute shreds. Sheep given 40<br />
mg agroclav<strong>in</strong>e subcutaneously persistently<br />
licked the walls of the pen for 2 to 3 hours, an<br />
expression of quite atypical behavior. In contrast,<br />
at a dose of 350 mg day -1 (which elicited no<br />
overt signs), pregnant mice failed to prepare for<br />
lactation and pups died of starvation. At a lower<br />
dose, lactation was almost switched off, be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sufficient only to support one grossly malnourished<br />
pup whose eyes were still closed at 4<br />
weeks of age and whose weight was less than<br />
one fifth of the weight of a normal animal at 3<br />
weeks of age. When the higher dose was given<br />
to lactat<strong>in</strong>g mice, lactation was switched off and<br />
the pups ceased to thrive. When a similar dose<br />
was given to mice on days 3, 4, and 5 after <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
blastocysts failed to implant and<br />
pregnancy did not establish (Mantle 1969).<br />
130<br />
These f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs po<strong>in</strong>ted to an endocr<strong>in</strong>e-mediated<br />
mechanism which logically results from<br />
central (hypothalamic) stimulation caus<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong><br />
the mouse or rat, a dim<strong>in</strong>ution of prolact<strong>in</strong> release<br />
from the pituitary gland and the consequent<br />
paucity of lactogenic stimulus. Prolact<strong>in</strong><br />
be<strong>in</strong>g also a luteotropic hormone <strong>in</strong> these experimental<br />
animals, its absence leads <strong>in</strong> turn to <strong>in</strong>sufficient<br />
progesterone to prepare the uterus<br />
wall for blastocyst implantation.<br />
Strik<strong>in</strong>g though these effects are <strong>in</strong> the mouse<br />
or rat, without elicit<strong>in</strong>g any overt signs of altered<br />
behavior, it was not possible to produce<br />
similar agalactia <strong>in</strong> either the goat or the cow<br />
where relatively small changes <strong>in</strong> lactation performance<br />
are comparatively easy to monitor.<br />
Further, the known differences <strong>in</strong> mechanisms<br />
of endocr<strong>in</strong>e control of pregnancy <strong>in</strong> laboratory<br />
rodents and the human do not allow confident<br />
prediction that any notable reproductive hazard<br />
could be ascribed to lightly ergotised millet as a<br />
human food. Although apparently no experiments<br />
on the effect of clav<strong>in</strong>e alkaloids on lactation<br />
<strong>in</strong> the pig have been reported, the close<br />
mimick<strong>in</strong>g of the Rhodesian porc<strong>in</strong>e agalactia by<br />
the mouse implies that the pig is at least sensitive<br />
to the <strong>in</strong>hibition of prolact<strong>in</strong> release with<br />
respect to its role <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>itiat<strong>in</strong>g and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
lactation. The conclusion, therefore, is that while<br />
ergotised millet may be undesirable for human<br />
consumption, any effects are not likely to <strong>in</strong>volve<br />
serious hazard. Nevertheless, what might<br />
be assumed to be a potentially reasonable outlet<br />
for substandard gra<strong>in</strong>, namely as pig feed, is<br />
certa<strong>in</strong>ly contra<strong>in</strong>dicated for pregnant (near<br />
term) or lactat<strong>in</strong>g sows. S<strong>in</strong>ce species other than<br />
pigs (e.g., buffalo, goat, donkey) may be more<br />
usually available <strong>in</strong> millet-grow<strong>in</strong>g areas subject<br />
to ergot epidemics, there is a clear need for the<br />
results of research on their tolerance of ergot to<br />
be published <strong>in</strong> the most relevant scientific literature.<br />
An even wider market concern<strong>in</strong>g feed<br />
for poultry or fish could well be explored to advantage.<br />
Ergot has acquired a toxigenic image<br />
which is partly well justified (Mantle 1978) but<br />
which must not be allowed to be a basis for unreasonable<br />
and unscientific extrapolation across<br />
the whole range of Claviceps spp. While Claviceps<br />
purpurea deserves the maximum caution, C. fusiformis<br />
on millet commands less concern unless<br />
contam<strong>in</strong>ation exceeds about 1%. There are<br />
grounds to believe that ergot disease of sor-