- Page 2 and 3:
Abstract Citation: de Milliano, W.A
- Page 4 and 5:
INTSORMIL USAID Title XII Collabora
- Page 6 and 7:
Foliar Diseases of Sorghum G.N. Odv
- Page 8 and 9:
Despite all the complexities of the
- Page 10 and 11:
Resistance to ergot in pearl millet
- Page 13 and 14:
Sorghum and Pearl Millet Pathology
- Page 15 and 16:
inicola), head mold (Curvularia lun
- Page 17:
to W. A. J. de Milliano and S. D. S
- Page 20 and 21:
Table 1. Area ('000 ha) sown to sor
- Page 22 and 23:
annual regional meetings have been
- Page 24 and 25:
sowing of the ZSV 1 spreader rows a
- Page 26 and 27:
Zambia, and Zimbabwe. Several entri
- Page 28 and 29:
References Angus, A. 1965. Annotate
- Page 31 and 32:
Sorghum Diseases in Eastern Africa
- Page 33 and 34:
The Striga spp are invariably a maj
- Page 35 and 36:
Sorghum Diseases in Western Africa
- Page 37 and 38:
or six leaves only towards maturity
- Page 39:
Odvody, G.N. 1986. Gray leaf spot.
- Page 42 and 43:
Table 1. Forage sorghum production
- Page 44 and 45:
References Japan: Ministry of Agric
- Page 46 and 47:
keting problems, absence of financi
- Page 48 and 49:
lines) and tar spot (51 resistant l
- Page 50 and 51:
Karganilla, A.D., and Elazegui, F.A
- Page 52 and 53: espectively. Elevation above mean s
- Page 55 and 56: Sorghum Diseases in India: Knowledg
- Page 57 and 58: India Coordinated Sorghum Improveme
- Page 59 and 60: more from disease than did those ma
- Page 61 and 62: Sundaram (1977) reported control of
- Page 63 and 64: Multiple disease resistance insect
- Page 65 and 66: 1976. Control of foliar diseases of
- Page 67 and 68: Sorghum Diseases in Brazil C.R. Cas
- Page 69 and 70: tention is therefore being given to
- Page 71 and 72: deficit and high temperatures are c
- Page 73 and 74: Sorghum Diseases in South America E
- Page 75 and 76: term, proposed by Glueck et al. (19
- Page 77 and 78: Sorghum Diseases in Central America
- Page 79 and 80: Zonate leaf spot, a disease incited
- Page 81 and 82: National Research Efforts Crop impr
- Page 83: America: importancia, localizacion
- Page 86 and 87: eilianum). Both hybrids have female
- Page 88 and 89: Disease research conducted in Mexic
- Page 90 and 91: een observed, the disease is potent
- Page 92 and 93: Mexico, particularly in Tamaulipas.
- Page 94 and 95: cion de variantes del virus del mos
- Page 96 and 97: Figure 1. Agroecological sorghum-gr
- Page 98 and 99: Table 2. Continued Common name Caus
- Page 100 and 101: Even so, certain diseases have been
- Page 105 and 106: Abstract About 95% of the world's p
- Page 107 and 108: semination, zoospore release, and i
- Page 109 and 110: physiological maturity of the host
- Page 111 and 112: hybrids will probably always lag be
- Page 113 and 114: Other Diseases Numerous other disea
- Page 115 and 116: Crops Research Institute for the Se
- Page 117 and 118: downy mildew and the nutrient conte
- Page 119 and 120: Pearl Millet Diseases in Western Af
- Page 121 and 122: millet lines and cultivars from nat
- Page 123 and 124: References Ball, S.L., and Pike, D.
- Page 125 and 126: Pearl Millet Diseases in Southern A
- Page 127 and 128: 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1
- Page 129 and 130: sp, Cercospora fusimaculans, Phylla
- Page 131 and 132: It is planned to develop Striga sic
- Page 133 and 134: Pearl Millet Diseases in India: Kno
- Page 135 and 136: served (Sundaram 1969). The inoculu
- Page 137: cumbu (Pennisetum typhoides). Madra
- Page 140 and 141: Experimental feeding of the suspect
- Page 142 and 143: Mantle, P.G. 1969. Interruption of
- Page 145 and 146: Bacterial Diseases of Sorghum L.E.
- Page 147 and 148: escent pigment is not produced on K
- Page 149 and 150: P. avenae has been reported from No
- Page 151 and 152: All P. rubrilineans strains tested
- Page 153 and 154:
and occurred more often at the leaf
- Page 155 and 156:
Figure 6. Bacterial spot on sorghum
- Page 157 and 158:
host genotype. Copious amounts of b
- Page 159 and 160:
Table 4. Reaction of six Xanthomona
- Page 161:
Leach, J.E., Ramundo, B.A., Pearson
- Page 164 and 165:
insecticides, fungicides, or other
- Page 166 and 167:
nonparticle proteins may also be de
- Page 168 and 169:
R., and Milne, R.G. 1981. Guideline
- Page 171 and 172:
Biotic and Abiotic Factors Associat
- Page 173 and 174:
crop plants are inhibitory to sorgh
- Page 175 and 176:
References Bandyopadhyay, R. 1986.
- Page 177 and 178:
Foliar Diseases of Sorghum G.N. Odv
- Page 179 and 180:
fusimaculans Atk. (Wall et al. 1987
- Page 181 and 182:
tion of host tissue. As wind and ra
- Page 183 and 184:
leaf-disease resistance (polygenic)
- Page 185 and 186:
tors associated with expression of
- Page 187:
Tarr, S.A.J. 1962. Diseases of sorg
- Page 190 and 191:
Similarly, several species of Heter
- Page 192 and 193:
ported significant growth suppressi
- Page 194 and 195:
References Anonymous. 1978. Indexed
- Page 197 and 198:
Striga (Witchweeds) in Sorghum and
- Page 199 and 200:
maize, sorghum, and millets fields.
- Page 201 and 202:
Table 1. Continued Species Distribu
- Page 203 and 204:
Control Approaches Cultural Several
- Page 205 and 206:
Table 2. Striga control methods des
- Page 207 and 208:
This has produced excellent results
- Page 209 and 210:
tial; involvement with internationa
- Page 211:
Riches, C.R., de Milliano, W.A.J.,
- Page 214 and 215:
Symptoms C. graminicola infects lea
- Page 216 and 217:
References Ali M.E.K. 1986. Colleto
- Page 218 and 219:
Politis, D.J. 1975. The identity an
- Page 220 and 221:
SC 283 are used to separate eight g
- Page 222 and 223:
eleased in 1988 as commercial hybri
- Page 224 and 225:
pathogen virulent to these hybrids
- Page 226 and 227:
acylalanine fungicides (Odvody, unp
- Page 229 and 230:
Stalk Rots S. Pande 1 and R.I. Karu
- Page 231 and 232:
Table 1. Lodging and yield of root
- Page 233 and 234:
among several in a disease of compl
- Page 235 and 236:
Crop management Crop management can
- Page 237 and 238:
dent, and epidemiologically sound r
- Page 239 and 240:
and better sources of resistance is
- Page 241 and 242:
3. Associated pathogens. Interactio
- Page 243 and 244:
(Maubi) Ashby in Ontario. Scientifi
- Page 245 and 246:
Sorghum Ergot R. Bandyopadhyay 1 Ab
- Page 247 and 248:
Singh (1964) was the first to repor
- Page 249 and 250:
fall on the ground remain viable fo
- Page 251 and 252:
Host resistance Sowing of resistant
- Page 253 and 254:
Chinnadurai, G., Lalithakumari, D.,
- Page 255 and 256:
Sorghum Smuts El Hilu Omer 1 and R.
- Page 257 and 258:
Variation in pathogen populations S
- Page 259 and 260:
10 mm Mycelia invade developing flo
- Page 261 and 262:
Table 4. Reaction of selected sorgh
- Page 263 and 264:
A Review of Sorghum Grain Mold G.A.
- Page 265 and 266:
For purposes of this review, GM ref
- Page 267 and 268:
Since the 1980s, several instances
- Page 269 and 270:
Relationship of disease severity an
- Page 271 and 272:
infection. Either fungus can interf
- Page 273 and 274:
Pradesh 502 324, India: Internation
- Page 275 and 276:
Cereal Chemistry and Grain Mold Res
- Page 277 and 278:
0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 3 2 1 0 1 0 2 1
- Page 279 and 280:
levels of free phenolic compounds (
- Page 281 and 282:
60 45 30 15 0 30 15 0 30 15 (R) (M)
- Page 283 and 284:
Breeding for Grain Mold Resistance
- Page 285 and 286:
mid-1970s. Murty et al. (1980) revi
- Page 287 and 288:
250 225 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 2
- Page 289 and 290:
70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Floaters (%)
- Page 291 and 292:
Table 3. Phenotypic correlation bet
- Page 293 and 294:
Table 7. Mean threshed grain mold r
- Page 295:
lation to fungal resistance. Cereal
- Page 299 and 300:
Abstract: Sweet sorghum varieties r
- Page 301 and 302:
drews, Sorghum and Millet Breeder,
- Page 303:
ladder markers and lambda DNA/Hind
- Page 307 and 308:
Principles and Criteria of Seed Tra
- Page 309 and 310:
aces has increased concern about tr
- Page 311 and 312:
Ciccarone, A. 1949. Zonate leaf spo
- Page 313 and 314:
Epidemiology of Sorghum Diseases in
- Page 315 and 316:
305
- Page 317 and 318:
Tagged plants were harvested at the
- Page 319 and 320:
Materials and methods The 1983 expe
- Page 321 and 322:
intermediate population had 22.5% S
- Page 323 and 324:
out-yield landraces, but they suffe
- Page 325 and 326:
higher densities and apply fertiliz
- Page 327:
Summary Report for 1981-1983. Missi
- Page 330 and 331:
terization of the lines for importa
- Page 332 and 333:
tion into which the resistance is t
- Page 334 and 335:
502 324, India: International Crops
- Page 336 and 337:
Breeding for resistance The main ob
- Page 338 and 339:
world review: proceedings of the Fi
- Page 341 and 342:
Successful Transfer of ICRISAT Down
- Page 343 and 344:
might have caused the systemic infe
- Page 345 and 346:
Seventeen recommendation committees
- Page 347 and 348:
Nematology 1. Data on the role of n
- Page 349 and 350:
8. Use of field and controlled envi
- Page 351 and 352:
3. Determine the influence of host,
- Page 353:
Panicle diseases: 1. Anthracnose (m
- Page 357 and 358:
Guiragossian: Is there a price diff
- Page 359 and 360:
Thomas: 1. Striga hermonthica; and
- Page 361 and 362:
Casela: Yes, I have. Garud: Is suga
- Page 363 and 364:
ment. Do you exclude the possibilit
- Page 365 and 366:
these are very similar to wounds ca
- Page 367 and 368:
Starr: Although not normally classi
- Page 369 and 370:
ply that has signigicant financial
- Page 371 and 372:
was named Colletotrichum sublineola
- Page 373 and 374:
Mughogho: The literature contains n
- Page 375 and 376:
GM-resistance in the savannas of so
- Page 377 and 378:
King: Was the millet host only Seta
- Page 379 and 380:
using differing inoculum concentrat
- Page 384:
ICRISAT International Crops Researc