BIB-SEM.6HB-dial _2010 - Telefonica.net

[1. Recent history of the problem. 2. Orthography. 3. Morphology. 4. Syntax. 5.
Vocabulary].
M.J. Dahood, “The Language of Qoheleth”, CBQ 14, 1952, 227-232 [Phoenician influence].
M. Dahood, “Qoheleth and Northwest Semitic philology”, Biblica 43, 1962, 349-365
[grammatical and lexical observations].
M. Dahood, “The Value of Ugaritic for Textual Criticism”, Biblica 40, 1959, 160-170.
M. Dahood, “Ugaritic-Hebrew syntax and style”, UF 1, 1969, 15-36.
M. Dahood, “Hebrew-Ugaritic lexicography, I-IX”, Biblica 44, 1963, 289-303; 45, 1964, 393-
412 ; 46, 1965, 311-332; 47, 1966, 403-419; 48, 1967, 421-438; 49, 1968, 355-369; 50,
1969, 337-356; 51, 1970, 391-404; 52, 1971, 337-356.
M. Dahood, “Hebrew-Ugaritic lexicography. X”, Biblica 53, 1972, 386-403.
M. Dahood, “Hebrew-Ugaritic lexicography XI”, Biblica 54, 1973, 351-366.
M. Dahood, “Hebrew-Ugaritic lexicography, XII”, Biblica 55, 1974, 381-393.
M. Dahood, “Ugaritic and the Old Testament”, in Fs, Coppens I, pp. 14-33.
M. Dahood, “Jeremiah 5,31 and UT 127:2.”, Biblica 57, 1976, 106-108.
M. Dahood, “Canticle 7,9 and UT 52,61. A question of method”, Biblica 57, 1976, 109-110.
M. Dahood, “Ugaritic Studies and the Bible”, Greg 43, 1962, 55-79.
M. Dahood, “Ugaritic and the Old Testament”, EThL 44, 1968, 35-54.
M. Dahood, “Hebrew-Ugaritic lexicography, I-IX”, Biblica 44, 1963, 289-303; 45, 1964, 393-
412 ; 46, 1965, 311-332; 47, 1966, 403-419; 48, 1967, 421-438; 49, 1968, 355-369; 50,
1969, 337-356; 51, 1970, 391-404; 52, 1971, 337-356.
M. Dahood, “Canaanite words in Qoheleth 10.20”, Biblica 46, 1965, 210-212.
M. Dahood, “The Phoenician Background of Qoheleth”, Biblica 47, 1966, 264-282.
J.R. Davila, “Qoheleth and northern Hebrew”, Maarav 5-6, 1990. 69-87.
W.C: Delsman, “Zur Sprache des Buches Koheleth”, in Fs. Van der Ploeg, pp., 341-365
[grammar & lexicon]
W.C. Delsman, “Die Inkongruenz im Buch Qoheleth”, in Fs. Hoftijzer, pp. 27-37.
D.C. Fredericks, Qoheleth's language: re-evaluating its nature and dat,(Anc. Near Eastern
Texts and Studies, 3), Lewiston NY 1988 [rev.: JAOS 111, 1991, 821-824 (J.R. Davila);
ZAW 102, 1990, 148-149 (I. Kottsieper); JThS 41, 1990, 153-155 (J.G. Snaith); CBQ 53,
1991, 99-100 (J.A. Gladson)].
L. Ginsberg, Studies in Koheleth (Texts and Studies of the Jewish Theological Seminary of
America, 17), New York 1950 [rev.: RB 58, 1951, 431-433 (L. Grollenberg); JewQR 42,
1951-1952, 87-90 (H.H. Rowley); VT 1, 1951, 237-238 (E. Hammershaimb); Syria 29, 1952,
351-352 (A. Herdner)].
H.L. Ginsberg, “Supplementary studies in koheleth”, PAAJR 21, 1952, 35-62.
R. Gordis, “The Original Language of Qohelet”, JewQR 37, 1946-47, 67-84 [apropos of F.
Zimmermann’s article “The Aramaic Provenance of Q.].
R. Gordis, “Koheleth - Hebrew or Aramaic”, JBL 71, 1952, 93-109.
R. Gordis, “Was Koheleth a Phoenician? Some observations on methods in research”, JBL 74,
1955, 103-114 [on M.J. Dahood, “Canaanite-Phoenician influence in Qoheleth”, Biblica 33,
30-52, 191-221].
R. Holstedt, “The Syntactic Encoding of the Collaborative Nature of Qohelet Experiment”,
Journal of Hebrew Scripture, 9, 2009, art 19 on line
B. Isaksson, Studies in the language of Qohelet ... Uppsala/Stockholm 1987 [rev.: JBL 108,
1989, 510-512 (M.V. Fox); RSO 63/4, 1989, 310-312 (F. Bianchi); ZAW 101, 1989, 462-463
(I. Kottsieper); CBQ 51/2, 1989, 332-333 (R. E. Murphy)].
P. Magnanini, “Sull’origine letteraria dell’Ecclesiaste”, AIO 18, 1968, 363-384 [Lexical and
morpho1ogical aramaisms].
H.H. Rowley, “The Problems of Ecclesiastes”, JewQR 42, 1951-52, 87-90 [rev. of H. E. Riger,
Modern Hebrew, New York 1953].
D. Rudman, “Qohelet’s use of lpny”, JSL 23, 1997, 143-150.
An. Schoors, The preacher sought to find pleasing words: a study of the language of Qoheleth.
7