16.06.2013 Views

Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ...

Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ...

Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BIRDS OF ARGENTINA, PARAGUAY, URUGUAY, AND CHILE 405<br />

PHRYGILUS FRUTICETI FRUTICETI (Kittlitz)<br />

Fringilla fruticeti Kittlitz, Kupf. Naturg. Vog., 1832, p. 18, pi. 23, fig. 1.<br />

(Coast near Valparaiso, Chile.)<br />

In a recent partial review of Phi^ygilus, Lowe" has proposed to<br />

divide the genus as ordinarily taken into four groups, ba<strong>si</strong>ng his<br />

action apparently mainly on color pattern. (He does not include<br />

in his study P. alaudinus and its allies, which have been placed by<br />

some in a fifth segregation.) After a careful study of the entire<br />

group, and a con<strong>si</strong>deration of the structural characters of the different<br />

sj)ecies, I am led to follow a somewhat different course. The<br />

two speqies melanodera and xanthograviina differ from all others involved<br />

in the greatly exaggerated wing tip, where the distance from<br />

the longest secondaries to the tip of the longest primaries is one-<br />

third of the length of the wing, the ninth (outermost) primary is<br />

equal to or slightly longer than the eighth, and the other primaries<br />

decrease regularly in length to the first. (In true Phrygilus the<br />

wing tip is decidedly more rounded.) In addition the bill is more<br />

conical, more sharplj'^ pointed, a condition that reaches its maximum<br />

in xanthogrammia. These two species may be separated as the genus<br />

Melanodera Bonaparte.^ (I am uncertain as to the relationships of<br />

Rowettia to this group, as I have not seen specimens.)<br />

All of the remaining species must be included in the genus<br />

Phrygilus^ <strong>si</strong>nce there are no structural characters whereby groups<br />

of the species involved may be separated definitely from one an-<br />

other. The divi<strong>si</strong>ons that have been proposed may be con<strong>si</strong>dered<br />

one by one. The type of the supposed genus Rhopospina^^ Phrygilus<br />

fruticeti (Kittlitz), has the wing formula, wing tip, tarsal and<br />

bill structure so <strong>si</strong>milar to that of Phrygilus gayi (Eydoux and<br />

Gervais) that the two may not be separated excej^t on the ba<strong>si</strong>s<br />

of color. Phinjgilus alaudinus (Kittlitz), which has been segregated<br />

as the type of Corydospiza Sundevall,^° has the inner secondaries<br />

almost as long as the primaries, a character shared by Phrygilus<br />

carhonarius (d'Orbigny and Lafresnaye), which from color is placed<br />

by Lowe in Rhopospina. The wing tip is gradually lengthened<br />

in P. plehejus Cabanis, and P. ocularis Sclater, until it approximates<br />

the length found in P. gayi and its allies. Corydospiza may<br />

be used as a subgenus to include the four species mentioned in which<br />

the wing tip is shorter than the culmen from base, as distinguished<br />

from a subgenus Phrygilus {verus), in which the Aving tip is<br />

longer than the culmen. Tran<strong>si</strong>tion between the two is so gradual<br />

f Ibis, 192.3, pp. 513-519.<br />

' Consp. Gen. Av., vol. 1, 1850, p. 470. Type, Emberiza melanodera Quoy and<br />

Gaimard.<br />

» Cabanis, Mus. Hein., pt. 1, April, 1851, p. 135.<br />

i»Av. Tent., 1872, p. 33.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!