Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ...

Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ... Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ...

si.pddr.si.edu
from si.pddr.si.edu More from this publisher
16.06.2013 Views

22 BUULETIN 133, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM the mountain slopes in little bands, traveling down toward the plains where they passed on northward. With heavy storms in the higher reaches, these movements become more pronounced and at times include hill inhabiting species that temporarily pass down to the warmer lowlands until the stress of weather has passed. It was interesting also to observe the migrational movements of a form of the monarch butterfly {Anosia erippits) that wintered in numbers in the Chaco, and in spring flew southward to spread over the pampas. ANNOTATED LIST OF BIRDS The following account consists of an annotated list of the species of birds collected, with observations on a few of which no specimens were taken. Measurements, made in millimeters, have been taken by the method usual among present day American ornithologists. The wing measurement is the chord of the distance from the bend of the wing (the metacarpal or wrist joint) to the tip of the longest primary taken with dividers except in large birds where the measurement is made with a straight rule, but without flattening the wing. The length of tail, measured with dividers, is the distance from the base of the median rectrices on the uropygium to the tips of the longest tail feathers. The culmen has been measured from the base in all cases except where (as in parrots) it is specified as taken from the cere, etc. The distance, measured with dividers, is taken in a straight line from the basal point to the extreme tip. The tarsal length, likewise taken with dividers, is secured by placing one point of the instrument at the upper end of the tarsus on its posterior side, and the other at the end of the middle trochlea of the meta- tarsus. With shifts in generic names, so common in our modern nomen- clature, at times a change is required in the current designation for a family. Current family names have been derived from the appel- lation of some genus considered as typical of the group concerned, in the main from the oldest genus name in the family. Where this genus name has been changed through the application of the law of priority in publication, type fixation, or other cause, change in the family name necessarily follows. Certain ornithologists (mainly in England) are advocating derivation of a new family name from the next oldest generic appellation. This, however, may cause confusion since it may result in shifting the tjq^e genus from a group that has been held typical of the family concerned, to one that is aberrant or possibly even to a genus of doubtful allocation. The confusion that may arise is easily evident. It seems preferable to allow the same generic group to remain as typical of the family regardless of change in its appellation; in other words, to allow the family name

BIEDS OF ARGENTINA, PAEAGUAY, URUGUAY, AISD CHILE 23 to change with shifts in the name of the type genus. Such changes though lamentable are less confusing than shifts in the facies of a family complex, such as might result if the other course that has been -outlined is adopted. Such a course is implied in the International Code of Nomen- •clature (art. 5), which specifies that "the name of a family or subfamily is to be changed when its type genus is changed." Order RHEIFORMES Family RHEIDAE RHEA AMERICANA (Linnaeus) Struthio americanus Linnaeus, Syst. Nat., ed. 10, vol. 1, 1758, p. 155. (Sergii)e, Brazil.) In spite of continued pursuit by Indian and white hunters the rhea still remains in fair abundance in the wilder sections of the Chaco, while on many of the extensive estancias in the pampas of Argentina and Uruguay the birds are preserved in bands that in many instances include a large number of individuals. In settled districts, where land has been divided into small holdings, the great birds have been largely exterminated, a fate that will befall the majority as rural population increases. At the Riacho Pilaga, Formosa, in August, 1920, Indians brought in bundles of rhea plumes for trade, to be sold later in Buenos Aires where they were made into feather dusters. Near the railroad at this same locality rheas still occurred in some of the open camps, but were more abundant farther inland toward the Rio Pilcomayo. Occasional bands were observed from the train in traversing the railroad line leading northwest into the interior from the town of Formosa. In the Paraguayan Chaco west of Puerto Pinasco rheas were common. In 1920 fences on the holdings of the International Products Co. had been extended westward to a point 120 kilometers from the Rio Paraguay. Outside this boundary rheus Avere encountered frequently but were wild and wary, as they were subject to pursuit by Indians who frequently offered bundles of plumes or sections of skin for sale. Small bands were to be seen within the fences in some of the league square fotrerofi^ where open savannahs offered suitable range, and near the ranch at Kilometer 80, west of Puerto Pinasco, rheas were observed frequently, especially in the region along the Riacho Jacare. On my arrival in that region on September 6 I was told that a rhea's nest containing 43 eggs had been found a week previous, and during the period of my stay male rheas were heard booming during the morning hours. On one oc- casion (September 12) in company with Carl Hettman I heard this

22 BUULETIN 133, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM<br />

the mountain slopes in little bands, traveling down toward the<br />

plains where they passed on northward. With heavy storms in the<br />

higher reaches, these movements become more pronounced and at<br />

times include hill inhabiting species that temporarily pass down<br />

to the warmer lowlands until the stress of weather has passed.<br />

It was interesting also to observe the migrational movements of<br />

a form of the monarch butterfly {Ano<strong>si</strong>a erippits) that wintered<br />

in numbers in the Chaco, and in spring flew southward to spread<br />

over the pampas.<br />

ANNOTATED LIST OF BIRDS<br />

The following account con<strong>si</strong>sts of an annotated list of the species<br />

of birds collected, with observations on a few of which no specimens<br />

were taken. Measurements, made in millimeters, have been taken<br />

by the method usual among present day American ornithologists.<br />

The wing measurement is the chord of the distance from the bend<br />

of the wing (the metacarpal or wrist joint) to the tip of the longest<br />

primary taken with dividers except in large birds where the measurement<br />

is made with a straight rule, but without flattening the wing.<br />

The length of tail, measured with dividers, is the distance from the<br />

base of the median rectrices on the uropygium to the tips of the<br />

longest tail feathers. The culmen has been measured from the base<br />

in all cases except where (as in parrots) it is specified as taken from<br />

the cere, etc. The distance, measured with dividers, is taken in a<br />

straight line from the basal point to the extreme tip. The tarsal<br />

length, likewise taken with dividers, is secured by placing one point<br />

of the instrument at the upper end of the tarsus on its posterior<br />

<strong>si</strong>de, and the other at the end of the middle trochlea of the meta-<br />

tarsus.<br />

With shifts in generic names, so common in our modern nomen-<br />

clature, at times a change is required in the current de<strong>si</strong>gnation for<br />

a family. Current family names have been derived from the appel-<br />

lation of some genus con<strong>si</strong>dered as typical of the group concerned,<br />

in the main from the oldest genus name in the family. Where this<br />

genus name has been changed through the application of the law of<br />

priority in publication, type fixation, or other cause, change in the<br />

family name necessarily follows. Certain ornithologists (mainly in<br />

England) are advocating derivation of a new family name from the<br />

next oldest generic appellation. This, however, may cause confu<strong>si</strong>on<br />

<strong>si</strong>nce it may result in shifting the tjq^e genus from a group that<br />

has been held typical of the family concerned, to one that is aberrant<br />

or pos<strong>si</strong>bly even to a genus of doubtful allocation. The confu<strong>si</strong>on<br />

that may arise is ea<strong>si</strong>ly evident. It seems preferable to allow the<br />

same generic group to remain as typical of the family regardless of<br />

change in its appellation; in other words, to allow the family name

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!