Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ...
Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ... Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ...
312 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM identical, so that without advantage of comparative material my notes are given herewith under the typical subspecies. Doctor Chapman's decision ®° that ockendeni of Hartert from Peru should rank as a subspecies of keterogyna^ which he considers specifically distinct from aterrimus, in my opinion, after examination of five specimens (including a male from Carabaya, the type locality) is erroneous. Though ockendeni, in addition to smaller size, and darker coloration in the female, has a somewhat heavier bill, it appears that it is a form of aterrimus. The male of the present species is distinguished from K. cyanirostris by the broad white band across the underside of the wing, while the female is plain brown, unstreaked. An adult male of aterrimus in the United States National Museum, collected at Chilecito, La Kioja, Argentina, an abnormal specimen, has scattered white feathers on the sides and abdomen. This form was encountered first at General Roca, Rio Negro,, where the birds were fairly common from November 25 to December 2, 1920. An adult male was shot here on November 29, and females on November 25 and 29. Part of the birds observed frequented willow thickets along the Rio Negro, where they were probably on their breeding grounds, while others were found in the open, brush through the arid, gravelly hills to the north of Roca. The number of these last varied from day to day, and it was my opinion that the individuals in these areas were still in migration. The birds rested on low perches, flirting the tail constantly, at intervals darting out after small insects, or dropping down to run along for a few feet on the ground. The flash of white from the wings of the somberly clad males, as they took flight, was almost startling, while the reddish brown color in the tail and rump of females in the glar- ing desert sun appeared almost red. Their only note was a faint. tseet. Later, at Tapia, Tucuman, the species was recorded from April T to 12, 1921, and two specimens were secured, a male April 12 and a female April 11. Here the birds were encountered along deep barrancas in the ojDen forests, apparently in fall migration. The male taken at Tapia is in full plumage, while the female is just completing a fall moult. The two appear identical with specimens from Rio Negro. In an adult male, taken November 29, the tip of the bill was black;, base glaucous gray; iris Rood's brown; tarsus and toes black. A female shot on the same date had the tip of the bill blackish; base all around glaucous gra}', much duller on the maxilla; iris Rood's brown ; tarsus and toes black. 8» U. S. Nat. Mus., Bull. 117, 1921, p. 89.
BIKDS OF ARGENTINA, PARAGUAY, URUGUAY, AND CHILE 313 ENTOTRICCUS STRIATICEPS (d'Orbigny and Lafresnaye) Muscisaxicola striaticeps d'ORBiGNrr and Lafbesnaye, Mag. Zool., 1837, cl. 2, p. 66. (Chiquitos, Bolivia.) Dr. Hellmayr ^° has determined that this species, known for many years as einer^eus Sclater,^^ should bear the name of striaticeps as in- dicated above. He writes that the type, in the Paris Museum, is labeled as taken at Chiquitos, Bolivia, though in the original description the species is said to come from La Paz. The greatly narrowed l)rimaries in this species distinguish it not only from Knipolegus, but also from all other flycatchers. Mr. Ridgway described the pequ- liarities of this bird when he erected the genus Phaeotriccus, but as through inadvertence he designated Gnipolegus hudsoni as type, the name PTiaeotnccus must be used for hudsoni. As striaticeps is undoubtedly peculiar, the present writer and Peters"^ have proposed that it be called Entotriccus. It is characterized by greatly narrowed primaries with the sixth to the tenth (outermost) distinctly falcate; seventh primary longest; tenth shorter than the first. This flycatcher was recorded at the following points: Riacho Pilaga, Formosa, August 8 (adult female taken), 13 (two females and a male) and 18; Puerto Pinasco, Paraguay, September 3; Kilometer 80, west of Puerto Pinasco, September 9, 10 (a female shot) and 15 ; Tapia, Tucuman, April 7 to 13, 1921 (two males and a female taken April T and 9). The female taken at Tapia is less heavily streaked on throat and breast than skins from the Chaco, so that it is paler below, a difference due in part perhaps to the fact that the specimen is in fresh fall plumage. Females are identical with males in wing formula and in the narrowed form of the primaries. In the Chaco, during the winter season, these alert little flycatchers sought low perches on the sheltered sides of dense groves of forest, where they were protected from cold winds. In the warmer, more open scrub near Tapia, Tucuman, they were scattered at random through little valleys, though more frequent perhaps along deep- cut barrancas that were common in this region. When at rest the tail twitched constantly, heightening their superficial resemblance to smaU Empidonax. During warm forenoons, in pleasant weather, males, from a perch at the top of a low tree or a dead limb, frequently shot straight up for a distance of 20 feet, turned and descended head first, with closed wings until just above the former perch, when the velocity of their fall was checked with a sudden rattle of wings, and the bird once more was at rest, as nonchalant and jaunty as though s«Nov. Zool., Julj', 1906, pp. 318-319. "^ Cnipolef/us cinereus Sclater, Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1870, p. 58. (Corumba, Matto Grosso.) "» Proc. Biol. Soc. Washington, vol. 36, May 1, 1923, p. 144. Type, by original designation, MuaciaaMcola striaticeps d'Orbigny and Lafresnaye.
- Page 288 and 289: 264 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 290 and 291: 266 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 292 and 293: 268 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 294 and 295: U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM BULLETIN 133
- Page 296 and 297: 270 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 298 and 299: 272 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 300 and 301: 274 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 302 and 303: 276 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 304 and 305: 278 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 306 and 307: 280 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 308 and 309: 282 BULXJETIN 133, UNITED STATES NA
- Page 310 and 311: ^84 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 312 and 313: 286 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 314 and 315: 288 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 316 and 317: 290 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 318 and 319: 292 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 320 and 321: 294 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 322 and 323: 296 BULKETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 324 and 325: 298 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 326 and 327: 300 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 328 and 329: 302 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 330 and 331: 304 BULKETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 332 and 333: 306 BULUETIISr 133, UNITED STATES N
- Page 334 and 335: 308 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 336 and 337: 310 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 340 and 341: 314 BULKETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 342 and 343: 316 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 344 and 345: 318 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 346 and 347: 320 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 348 and 349: 322 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 350 and 351: : 324 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES N
- Page 352 and 353: U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM BULLETIN 133
- Page 354 and 355: 326 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 356 and 357: 328 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 358 and 359: 330 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 360 and 361: 332 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 362 and 363: 334 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 364 and 365: 336 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 366 and 367: 338 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 368 and 369: 340 BUI^LETIN 133, UNITED STATES NA
- Page 370 and 371: 342 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 372 and 373: 344 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 374 and 375: 346 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 376 and 377: 348 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 378 and 379: 350 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 380 and 381: 352 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 382 and 383: 354 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 384 and 385: 356 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 386 and 387: 358 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
312 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM<br />
identical, so that without advantage of comparative material my<br />
notes are given herewith under the typical subspecies. Doctor<br />
Chapman's deci<strong>si</strong>on ®° that ockendeni of Hartert from Peru should<br />
rank as a subspecies of keterogyna^ which he con<strong>si</strong>ders specifically<br />
distinct from aterrimus, in my opinion, after examination of five<br />
specimens (including a male from Carabaya, the type locality) is<br />
erroneous. Though ockendeni, in addition to smaller <strong>si</strong>ze, and<br />
darker coloration in the female, has a somewhat heavier bill, it<br />
appears that it is a form of aterrimus.<br />
The male of the present species is distinguished from K. cyanirostris<br />
by the broad white band across the under<strong>si</strong>de of the wing,<br />
while the female is plain brown, unstreaked. An adult male of<br />
aterrimus in the <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Museum</strong>, collected at<br />
Chilecito, La Kioja, Argentina, an abnormal specimen, has scattered<br />
white feathers on the <strong>si</strong>des and abdomen.<br />
This form was encountered first at General Roca, Rio Negro,,<br />
where the birds were fairly common from November 25 to December<br />
2, 1920. An adult male was shot here on November 29, and females<br />
on November 25 and 29. Part of the birds observed frequented<br />
willow thickets along the Rio Negro, where they were probably<br />
on their breeding grounds, while others were found in the open,<br />
brush through the arid, gravelly hills to the north of Roca. The<br />
number of these last varied from day to day, and it was my opinion<br />
that the individuals in these areas were still in migration. The<br />
birds rested on low perches, flirting the tail constantly, at intervals<br />
darting out after small insects, or dropping down to run along for<br />
a few feet on the ground. The flash of white from the wings of the<br />
somberly clad males, as they took flight, was almost startling, while<br />
the reddish brown color in the tail and rump of females in the glar-<br />
ing desert sun appeared almost red. Their only note was a faint.<br />
tseet.<br />
Later, at Tapia, Tucuman, the species was recorded from April T<br />
to 12, 1921, and two specimens were secured, a male April 12 and<br />
a female April 11. Here the birds were encountered along deep<br />
barrancas in the ojDen forests, apparently in fall migration. The<br />
male taken at Tapia is in full plumage, while the female is just<br />
completing a fall moult. The two appear identical with specimens<br />
from Rio Negro.<br />
In an adult male, taken November 29, the tip of the bill was black;,<br />
base glaucous gray; iris Rood's brown; tarsus and toes black. A<br />
female shot on the same date had the tip of the bill blackish; base<br />
all around glaucous gra}', much duller on the maxilla; iris Rood's<br />
brown ; tarsus and toes black.<br />
8» U. S. Nat. Mus., Bull. 117, 1921, p. 89.