Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ...

Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ... Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ...

si.pddr.si.edu
from si.pddr.si.edu More from this publisher
16.06.2013 Views

154 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NATIONAL. MUSEUM and another March 5. Near Tunuyan, Mendoza, six were recorded March 26 in company with the two species of yellowlegs. Two pectoral sandpipers that I shot here were extremely fat—in fact, one could not be preserved as a skin for this reason—but flew easily in spite of their heavy bodies. None were recorded later than this date. Two adult females shot at Puerto Pinasco, Paraguay, September 9, 1920, were in worn breeding plumage, with no indication of molt. A female shot at Lazcano, Uruguay, February 8, had renewed the entire plumage save that new feathers in small amount were still in sheaths on breast and back. A male taken at the same time had the outer primary in either wing barely appearing and the ninth, the adjacent one, not quite fully grown. Nevertheless the bird was apparently in northward migration. A male taken at Tunuyan, Mendoza, March 26, Avas in full plumage. PISOBIA BAIRDII (Coues) Actodromas bairdii Coues, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1861, p. 194. (Fort Resolution, Great Slave Lake, Canada.) Three Baird's sandpipers were observed March 5, 1921, near Guamini, Buenos Aires, in company with white-rumped sandpipers. The species was at this time in northward flight from a wintering ground in Patagonia. PISOBIA FUSCICOLLIS (Vieillot) Tringa fuscicolUs Vieillot, Nouv. Diet. Hist. Nat., vol. 34, 1819, p. 461. (Paraguay.) In addition to the characters of the white or dark upper tail cov- erts and other color differences usually assigned to distinguish the white-rumped and Baird's sandpipers, the two may be easily sepa- rated by the form of the bill. In P. hairdii the bill tip is little ex panded, the maxilla is elongately pointed, and the dorsal surface of the tip is hard and smooth. In P. fuscicolUs^ on the contrary, the tip of the bill is sensibly widened and has the surface distinctly pitted. These distinctions, perceptible under a low magnification lens, when once seen are recognized easily with the unaided eye and form a valuable identification character when, for example, one has specimens of the white-rumped sandpiper in which the dark cen- ters of the white feathers are somewhat more extensive than usual, or in which some of the light tail coverts have been lost and not yet renewed in molt. In fact, in an extensive series it is not difficult to find specimens that may not easily be separated from P. hairdii by color alone but that are readily identified by the bill. The same differences that have been pointed out between the bills of the white-rumped and Baird's sandpipers serve to distinguish

BIRDS OF ARGENTINA, PARAGUAY, URUGUAY, AND CHILE 155 Baird's sandpiper from the pectoral, since P. nielanotos has the tip of the bill heavily pitted. The appearance of the bill Avill thus separate these two readily where size or the color of the rump and upper tail coverts are not sufficiently distinct. The white-rumped sandpiper was the most abundant of the migrant shore birds in the regions visited in southern South America. The species was not recorded until September 6, 1920, when it appeared in abundance in southward migration on the lagoons at Kilometer 80, west of Puerto Pinasco, Paraguay. The first flocks from which specimens were taken were adult females, and two taken on the date when they were first recorded had laid eggs a few weeks previous as was shown by the appearence of the ovaries. The southward migration came with a rush as the birds passed through the night as witnessed by their calls. The flight continued until September 21, when a dozen, the last seen here, were recorded. The birds circled about lagoons in small compact flocks or walked along on muddy shores, where they fed with head down, probing rapidly in the soft mud; anything edible encountered was seized and swallowed and the bird continued without delay in its search for more. Farther south this species was encountered in abundance in its winter range on the pampa. Ten were recorded at Dolores, Buenos Aires, October 21, and from October 22 to November 15 the species was found in numbers on the coastal mud flats on the Bay of Samborombom. A few were seen at pools of water in the sand dunes below Cape San Antonio. Along the Rio Ajo white-rumped sandpipers were encountered in flocks of hundreds that came up stream to search the mud flats at low tide or were concentrated on bars at the mouth when the water was high. In early morning there was a steady flight of them passing to suitable feeding grounds. The birds flew swiftly with soft notes from 3 to 15 feet from the earth. In feeding they scattered out in little groups that covered the bare mud systematically. It was not unusual to record as many as 2,000 in a day. About 200 were observed in the bay at Ingeniero "V^Hiite, the port of Bahia Blanca, on December 13, and at Carhue, Buenos Aires, from December 16 to 18, white-rumped sandpipers were noted in fair numbers on inundated ground back of the shore of Lake Epiquen or about fresh-water ponds on the pampa inland. None were found in Uruguay during February, At Guamini, Buenos Aires, from March 3 to 8, white-rumped sandpipers were encountered in northward migration from a winter range in Patagonia. The species was fairly common on March 3 and increased greatly in abundance on the two days that followed. The northward journey was apparently as concerted as the move-

154 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NATIONAL. MUSEUM<br />

and another March 5. Near Tunuyan, Mendoza, <strong>si</strong>x were recorded<br />

March 26 in company with the two species of yellowlegs. Two<br />

pectoral sandpipers that I shot here were extremely fat—in fact,<br />

one could not be preserved as a skin for this reason—but flew ea<strong>si</strong>ly<br />

in spite of their heavy bodies. None were recorded later than this<br />

date.<br />

Two adult females shot at Puerto Pinasco, Paraguay, September 9,<br />

1920, were in worn breeding plumage, with no indication of molt.<br />

A female shot at Lazcano, Uruguay, February 8, had renewed the<br />

entire plumage save that new feathers in small amount were still in<br />

sheaths on breast and back. A male taken at the same time had<br />

the outer primary in either wing barely appearing and the ninth,<br />

the adjacent one, not quite fully grown. Nevertheless the bird was<br />

apparently in northward migration. A male taken at Tunuyan,<br />

Mendoza, March 26, Avas in full plumage.<br />

PISOBIA BAIRDII (Coues)<br />

Actodromas bairdii Coues, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1861, p. 194.<br />

(Fort Resolution, Great Slave Lake, Canada.)<br />

Three Baird's sandpipers were observed March 5, 1921, near<br />

Guamini, Buenos Aires, in company with white-rumped sandpipers.<br />

The species was at this time in northward flight from a wintering<br />

ground in Patagonia.<br />

PISOBIA FUSCICOLLIS (Vieillot)<br />

Tringa fuscicolUs Vieillot, Nouv. Diet. Hist. Nat., vol. 34, 1819, p. 461.<br />

(Paraguay.)<br />

In addition to the characters of the white or dark upper tail cov-<br />

erts and other color differences usually as<strong>si</strong>gned to distinguish the<br />

white-rumped and Baird's sandpipers, the two may be ea<strong>si</strong>ly sepa-<br />

rated by the form of the bill. In P. hairdii the bill tip is little ex<br />

panded, the maxilla is elongately pointed, and the dorsal surface of<br />

the tip is hard and smooth. In P. fuscicolUs^ on the contrary, the<br />

tip of the bill is sen<strong>si</strong>bly widened and has the surface distinctly<br />

pitted. These distinctions, perceptible under a low magnification<br />

lens, when once seen are recognized ea<strong>si</strong>ly with the unaided eye and<br />

form a valuable identification character when, for example, one has<br />

specimens of the white-rumped sandpiper in which the dark cen-<br />

ters of the white feathers are somewhat more exten<strong>si</strong>ve than usual,<br />

or in which some of the light tail coverts have been lost and not yet<br />

renewed in molt. In fact, in an exten<strong>si</strong>ve series it is not difficult to<br />

find specimens that may not ea<strong>si</strong>ly be separated from P. hairdii by<br />

color alone but that are readily identified by the bill.<br />

The same differences that have been pointed out between the bills<br />

of the white-rumped and Baird's sandpipers serve to distinguish

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!