Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ...
Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ... Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ...
154 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NATIONAL. MUSEUM and another March 5. Near Tunuyan, Mendoza, six were recorded March 26 in company with the two species of yellowlegs. Two pectoral sandpipers that I shot here were extremely fat—in fact, one could not be preserved as a skin for this reason—but flew easily in spite of their heavy bodies. None were recorded later than this date. Two adult females shot at Puerto Pinasco, Paraguay, September 9, 1920, were in worn breeding plumage, with no indication of molt. A female shot at Lazcano, Uruguay, February 8, had renewed the entire plumage save that new feathers in small amount were still in sheaths on breast and back. A male taken at the same time had the outer primary in either wing barely appearing and the ninth, the adjacent one, not quite fully grown. Nevertheless the bird was apparently in northward migration. A male taken at Tunuyan, Mendoza, March 26, Avas in full plumage. PISOBIA BAIRDII (Coues) Actodromas bairdii Coues, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1861, p. 194. (Fort Resolution, Great Slave Lake, Canada.) Three Baird's sandpipers were observed March 5, 1921, near Guamini, Buenos Aires, in company with white-rumped sandpipers. The species was at this time in northward flight from a wintering ground in Patagonia. PISOBIA FUSCICOLLIS (Vieillot) Tringa fuscicolUs Vieillot, Nouv. Diet. Hist. Nat., vol. 34, 1819, p. 461. (Paraguay.) In addition to the characters of the white or dark upper tail cov- erts and other color differences usually assigned to distinguish the white-rumped and Baird's sandpipers, the two may be easily sepa- rated by the form of the bill. In P. hairdii the bill tip is little ex panded, the maxilla is elongately pointed, and the dorsal surface of the tip is hard and smooth. In P. fuscicolUs^ on the contrary, the tip of the bill is sensibly widened and has the surface distinctly pitted. These distinctions, perceptible under a low magnification lens, when once seen are recognized easily with the unaided eye and form a valuable identification character when, for example, one has specimens of the white-rumped sandpiper in which the dark cen- ters of the white feathers are somewhat more extensive than usual, or in which some of the light tail coverts have been lost and not yet renewed in molt. In fact, in an extensive series it is not difficult to find specimens that may not easily be separated from P. hairdii by color alone but that are readily identified by the bill. The same differences that have been pointed out between the bills of the white-rumped and Baird's sandpipers serve to distinguish
BIRDS OF ARGENTINA, PARAGUAY, URUGUAY, AND CHILE 155 Baird's sandpiper from the pectoral, since P. nielanotos has the tip of the bill heavily pitted. The appearance of the bill Avill thus separate these two readily where size or the color of the rump and upper tail coverts are not sufficiently distinct. The white-rumped sandpiper was the most abundant of the migrant shore birds in the regions visited in southern South America. The species was not recorded until September 6, 1920, when it appeared in abundance in southward migration on the lagoons at Kilometer 80, west of Puerto Pinasco, Paraguay. The first flocks from which specimens were taken were adult females, and two taken on the date when they were first recorded had laid eggs a few weeks previous as was shown by the appearence of the ovaries. The southward migration came with a rush as the birds passed through the night as witnessed by their calls. The flight continued until September 21, when a dozen, the last seen here, were recorded. The birds circled about lagoons in small compact flocks or walked along on muddy shores, where they fed with head down, probing rapidly in the soft mud; anything edible encountered was seized and swallowed and the bird continued without delay in its search for more. Farther south this species was encountered in abundance in its winter range on the pampa. Ten were recorded at Dolores, Buenos Aires, October 21, and from October 22 to November 15 the species was found in numbers on the coastal mud flats on the Bay of Samborombom. A few were seen at pools of water in the sand dunes below Cape San Antonio. Along the Rio Ajo white-rumped sandpipers were encountered in flocks of hundreds that came up stream to search the mud flats at low tide or were concentrated on bars at the mouth when the water was high. In early morning there was a steady flight of them passing to suitable feeding grounds. The birds flew swiftly with soft notes from 3 to 15 feet from the earth. In feeding they scattered out in little groups that covered the bare mud systematically. It was not unusual to record as many as 2,000 in a day. About 200 were observed in the bay at Ingeniero "V^Hiite, the port of Bahia Blanca, on December 13, and at Carhue, Buenos Aires, from December 16 to 18, white-rumped sandpipers were noted in fair numbers on inundated ground back of the shore of Lake Epiquen or about fresh-water ponds on the pampa inland. None were found in Uruguay during February, At Guamini, Buenos Aires, from March 3 to 8, white-rumped sandpipers were encountered in northward migration from a winter range in Patagonia. The species was fairly common on March 3 and increased greatly in abundance on the two days that followed. The northward journey was apparently as concerted as the move-
- Page 124 and 125: : 104 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES N
- Page 126 and 127: 106 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 128 and 129: 108 BULLETIN 133^ UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 130 and 131: 110 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 132 and 133: 112 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 134 and 135: 114 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 136 and 137: 116 BULLETIN 133^ UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 138 and 139: 118 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 140 and 141: 120 BULLETIN 133^ UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 142 and 143: 122 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 144 and 145: 124 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 146 and 147: 126 BULLETIN 133^ UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 148 and 149: 128 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 150 and 151: 130 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 152 and 153: 132 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 154 and 155: 134 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 156 and 157: 136 BULLETIN 133; UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 158 and 159: 138 BULLETIN 133;, UNITED STATES NA
- Page 160 and 161: 140 BULLETIN 133^ UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 162 and 163: 142 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 164 and 165: 144 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 166 and 167: 146 BULLETIN 133^ UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 168 and 169: 148 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 170 and 171: 150 BULLETIN 133^ UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 172 and 173: 152 BULLETIN 133^ UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 176 and 177: 156 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 178 and 179: 158 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 180 and 181: 160 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 182 and 183: 162 BULLETIN 133; UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 184 and 185: 164 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 186 and 187: 166 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 188 and 189: 168 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 190 and 191: 170 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 192 and 193: 172 BULLETIN 133, UNITED * STATES N
- Page 194 and 195: 174 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 196 and 197: 176 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 198 and 199: 178 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 200 and 201: 180 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 202 and 203: 182 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 204 and 205: 184 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 206 and 207: 186 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 208 and 209: 188 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 210 and 211: 190 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 212 and 213: 192 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 214 and 215: 194 BULLETIN 133^ UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 216 and 217: U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM BULLETIN 133
- Page 218 and 219: 196 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 220 and 221: 198 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NAT
- Page 222 and 223: 200 BUJ-/LETIN 133, UNITED STATES N
154 BULLETIN 133, UNITED STATES NATIONAL. MUSEUM<br />
and another March 5. Near Tunuyan, Mendoza, <strong>si</strong>x were recorded<br />
March 26 in company with the two species of yellowlegs. Two<br />
pectoral sandpipers that I shot here were extremely fat—in fact,<br />
one could not be preserved as a skin for this reason—but flew ea<strong>si</strong>ly<br />
in spite of their heavy bodies. None were recorded later than this<br />
date.<br />
Two adult females shot at Puerto Pinasco, Paraguay, September 9,<br />
1920, were in worn breeding plumage, with no indication of molt.<br />
A female shot at Lazcano, Uruguay, February 8, had renewed the<br />
entire plumage save that new feathers in small amount were still in<br />
sheaths on breast and back. A male taken at the same time had<br />
the outer primary in either wing barely appearing and the ninth,<br />
the adjacent one, not quite fully grown. Nevertheless the bird was<br />
apparently in northward migration. A male taken at Tunuyan,<br />
Mendoza, March 26, Avas in full plumage.<br />
PISOBIA BAIRDII (Coues)<br />
Actodromas bairdii Coues, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1861, p. 194.<br />
(Fort Resolution, Great Slave Lake, Canada.)<br />
Three Baird's sandpipers were observed March 5, 1921, near<br />
Guamini, Buenos Aires, in company with white-rumped sandpipers.<br />
The species was at this time in northward flight from a wintering<br />
ground in Patagonia.<br />
PISOBIA FUSCICOLLIS (Vieillot)<br />
Tringa fuscicolUs Vieillot, Nouv. Diet. Hist. Nat., vol. 34, 1819, p. 461.<br />
(Paraguay.)<br />
In addition to the characters of the white or dark upper tail cov-<br />
erts and other color differences usually as<strong>si</strong>gned to distinguish the<br />
white-rumped and Baird's sandpipers, the two may be ea<strong>si</strong>ly sepa-<br />
rated by the form of the bill. In P. hairdii the bill tip is little ex<br />
panded, the maxilla is elongately pointed, and the dorsal surface of<br />
the tip is hard and smooth. In P. fuscicolUs^ on the contrary, the<br />
tip of the bill is sen<strong>si</strong>bly widened and has the surface distinctly<br />
pitted. These distinctions, perceptible under a low magnification<br />
lens, when once seen are recognized ea<strong>si</strong>ly with the unaided eye and<br />
form a valuable identification character when, for example, one has<br />
specimens of the white-rumped sandpiper in which the dark cen-<br />
ters of the white feathers are somewhat more exten<strong>si</strong>ve than usual,<br />
or in which some of the light tail coverts have been lost and not yet<br />
renewed in molt. In fact, in an exten<strong>si</strong>ve series it is not difficult to<br />
find specimens that may not ea<strong>si</strong>ly be separated from P. hairdii by<br />
color alone but that are readily identified by the bill.<br />
The same differences that have been pointed out between the bills<br />
of the white-rumped and Baird's sandpipers serve to distinguish