16.06.2013 Views

Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ...

Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ...

Bulletin - United States National Museum - si-pddr - Smithsonian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BIRDS OF ARGENTINA, PARAGUAY, URUGUAY, AND CHILE 151<br />

opinion. Mathews "* used the genus Iliornis of Kaup for the little<br />

greenshank, and remarks (p. 199) that "the species T. fiavipes seems<br />

to fall ea<strong>si</strong>ly into the genus Iliornis.'''' Further ^^ he unites the greater<br />

yellowlegs with Glottis nebularius in the genus Glottis. Mr. Ridgway<br />

-^ has segregated the two yellowlegs in the genus Neoglottis.<br />

Doctor Hartert ^^ has united them in the genus Tringa with eleven<br />

other species, namely, incana, totarms, guttifer, ergthropus, nehularia,<br />

ochropus, soUtaria, hypoleucos, macularia, stagnatilis, and glareola.<br />

Comparison of the greater and lesser yellowlegs fails to reveal<br />

characters of generic value that may serve to separate them. Save<br />

that the bill may be a trifle shorter in relation to the length of tarsus<br />

the lesser yellowlegs is practically a miniature of the greater.<br />

Mathew's suggestion that the two are not congeneric may be dis-<br />

missed as untenable.<br />

With due respect to Mr. Ridgway's opinion I do not believe that<br />

the two yellowlegs may be separated successfully in a generic sense<br />

from Totanus totanus. Examination of melanoleucus, -fiavipes,<br />

totanus, nebularius, erytJiropus, and stagnatUis reveals much of in-<br />

terest. Glottis has been con<strong>si</strong>dered as a distinct genus for nebularius<br />

on the ba<strong>si</strong>s of the recurved bill in that species. In this character it<br />

is approached by nielanoleucus and furthermore varies in amount<br />

of curvature so that in series melanoleucus and nebularius may not<br />

be separated on this ba<strong>si</strong>s. Some specimens of Totanus totanus have<br />

a distinct Aveb between middle and imier toes, while in others this<br />

web is reduced in extent. Development of this web grades clown in<br />

unbroken series from totanus through erythropus where it is distinct<br />

but small, to melanoleucus, fiavipes, and sfagnatilis, in which it is<br />

faintly indicated. The bill is shorter than the tarsus in melanoleucus,<br />

fiavipes, and stagTiatilis, from somewhat shorter to as long as the<br />

tarsus in totanus and longer than the tarsus in erythropus. Here,<br />

again, there is no line of demarcation. The little greenshank,<br />

stagnatilis, has the bill somewhat more slender than the others but<br />

in insufficient amount to validate its separation as a distinct genus.<br />

There is no reason apparent for not including in Totanus the following<br />

species, totanus, erythropus, nebularius, mda/rioleucus, fiavipes,<br />

and stagnatilis. In addition it seems doubtful if Pseudototanus may<br />

be successfully maintained for guttifer, a matter that is here left in<br />

abeyance <strong>si</strong>nce I have seen only one skin of this species.<br />

The course followed by Doctor Hartert in lumping 13 species under<br />

the genus Tringa seems ill advised. Four of the included species,<br />

hypoleucos, macularia, solitaria, and ocrophus have but two notches<br />

"J;irds Australia, vol. 3, pt. 2, May 2, 1913, p. 197.<br />

^ .'Ol. 3, pt. 3, Aug. 18, 1913, p. 224.<br />

* Birds North and Middle America, vol. 8, 1919, p. 129.<br />

^ Vog. PaUiark. Fauna, vol. 2, Heft. 13, Feb., 1921, pp. 1607-16C8.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!