volume one

volume one volume one

cristoraul.com
from cristoraul.com More from this publisher
16.06.2013 Views

258 HISTOET OF THE CHUSADES. results to the enliglitened observer ; botli offer grand lessons to policy and illustrious models to valour ; both founded new states, new colonies, and established relations between distant nations. Both had a marked influence upon the ci^Tlization of the ages that followed them : both, in short, developed great passions and fine characters, and thus furnished the happiest subjects for the epic muse, who dehgfhts only in celebrating prodigies and wonders. AVhen comparing these two memorable wars, and the poetical masterpieces that have celebrated them, we cannot but think that the subiect of the *' Jerusalem Delivered" is more wonderful than that of the '' Iliad." "We may still further say, that the heroes of Tasso are more interesting than those of Homer, and their exploits less fabulous. The cause which armed the Greeks was much less important than that which actuated the Christians. The latter, in some sort, took up arms for the assistance of misfortune and oppressed weakness. They went to defend a reUgion able to make them sensible of ills that were endured far from them, and to make them find brothers in regions uukuov>TL to them. This character of sociability is not to be foimd in any belief of the ancients. The Crusaders exhibited another spectacle with which antiquity was unacquainted—the union of religious humility with the love of glory. History shows us constantly these haughty heroes, the terror of Asia and the Mussulmans, bending their %'ictorious brows to the dust, and marching from conquest to conquest, covered with the sack of peni- tence. The priests, who exhorted them in battle, only raised their com-age by reproaching them with their sins. When they met vrith reverses, a thousand voices were raised among them to accuse their own misconduct ; and when they were victorious, it was God alone that gave them the victory, and religion forbade their claiming glory from it.* The historian may be permitted to think that this difference between the heroes of the '' Hiad" and those of the * Daimbert, Godfrey of Bouillon, and Raymond de St. Gilles, when writing to the pope and the faithful of the We>t. say that the victory of Dorylreum had filled the pilgrims with pride, and that God, to punish them, opposed Antioch to them, which delayed them nine months.

HISTORY OF THE CSUSADES. 259 holy war is not sufficiently marked in tlie poem of " Jerusalem Delivered."* Another reproach may likewise be addressed to the bard of Einaldo and Godfrey ; the ideas of magic and gallantry which he has too freely lavished upon his poem are not in accordance v.ith the truth of history. Magic, which is nothing but a sort of degenerated superstition, and which only deals with small things, was but little known to the Crusaders. Their superstition, however gross, had something noble and grand in it, which associated them sufficiently with the spirit of the epopee, T^ithout the poet having anything to alter ; their character and manners were grave and austere, and exceedingly well suited to the dignity of a rehgious epic. It was not till long after the first crusade that magic formed any part of the superstition of the Franks, or that their warlike manners abandoned the prominently epic character which distinguished them, to adopt the romantic character which they have preserved in all books of chivalry. It appears to us that we discover in Tasso much more of the manners of the times in which he hved than of those of the end of the eleventh century, the period of the events which form the subject of his poem. But it does not enter into the plan or the object of this work to carry such observations further.f After ha\ing spoken of the heroic deeds and of all that was wonderful in the first crusade, I will turn my attention to the immediate effects it produced upon Europe and Asia. We are sufficiently well acquainted with the evils by which it was followed ; great disasters are the familiar subjects of history, but the slow and almost insensible progress of the good that may result from a great revolution, is much less easily perceived. The first result of this crusade was to carry terror among * Tasso himself was of this opinion, as may be seen in an interesting letter addressed to us by M. Bureau Delamalle. The admiration which I entertain for the Poet of the Crusades, makes me exceedingly anxious that M. Baour Lormian should finish the undertaking he has begun, so worthy of his rare talent, a translation in verse of the Jerusalem Delivered. •f" M. Guinguene, in his Histoire Litteraire d'lialie, has deigned to adopt, with some modification, several of these observations, which is the most worthy reward of my labours and researches. Vol. I.— 13

258 HISTOET OF THE CHUSADES.<br />

results to the enliglitened observer ; botli offer grand lessons<br />

to policy and illustrious models to valour ; both founded<br />

new states, new colonies, and established relations between<br />

distant nations. Both had a marked influence upon the<br />

ci^Tlization of the ages that followed them : both, in short,<br />

developed great passions and fine characters, and thus<br />

furnished the happiest subjects for the epic muse, who<br />

dehgfhts only in celebrating prodigies and wonders.<br />

AVhen comparing these two memorable wars, and the<br />

poetical masterpieces that have celebrated them, we cannot<br />

but think that the subiect of the *' Jerusalem Delivered" is<br />

more wonderful than that of the '' Iliad." "We may still<br />

further say, that the heroes of Tasso are more interesting<br />

than those of Homer, and their exploits less fabulous. The<br />

cause which armed the Greeks was much less important<br />

than that which actuated the Christians. The latter, in<br />

some sort, took up arms for the assistance of misfortune and<br />

oppressed weakness. They went to defend a reUgion able<br />

to make them sensible of ills that were endured far from<br />

them, and to make them find brothers in regions uukuov>TL<br />

to them. This character of sociability is not to be foimd in<br />

any belief of the ancients.<br />

The Crusaders exhibited another spectacle with which<br />

antiquity was unacquainted—the union of religious humility<br />

with the love of glory. History shows us constantly these<br />

haughty heroes, the terror of Asia and the Mussulmans,<br />

bending their %'ictorious brows to the dust, and marching<br />

from conquest to conquest, covered with the sack of peni-<br />

tence. The priests, who exhorted them in battle, only raised<br />

their com-age by reproaching them with their sins. When<br />

they met vrith reverses, a thousand voices were raised among<br />

them to accuse their own misconduct ;<br />

and when they were<br />

victorious, it was God al<strong>one</strong> that gave them the victory, and<br />

religion forbade their claiming glory from it.*<br />

The historian may be permitted to think that this difference<br />

between the heroes of the '' Hiad" and those of the<br />

* Daimbert, Godfrey of Bouillon, and Raymond de St. Gilles, when<br />

writing to the pope and the faithful of the We>t. say that the victory of<br />

Dorylreum had filled the pilgrims with pride, and that God, to punish them,<br />

opposed Antioch to them, which delayed them nine months.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!