16.06.2013 Views

volume one

volume one

volume one

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HISTOET or THE CRUSADES. 228<br />

leaping from the tops of the wooden towers. The Mussulmans<br />

fled on all sides, and Jerusalem resounded with the<br />

cry of victory of the Crusaders,—<br />

" It is the will of God ! It<br />

is the will of God /<br />

" =*<br />

The companions of Godfrey and Tancred beat the gate of<br />

St. Stephen to pieces with axes, and the city was at once<br />

thrown open to the crowd of Crusaders, who pressed forward<br />

and contended for the honour of dealing the last blow<br />

to the conquered infidels.<br />

Raymond al<strong>one</strong> still experienced some resistance. Warned<br />

of the success of the Christians, by the clashing of arms,<br />

and the tumult he heard in the city, he endeavoured still<br />

further to animate his soldiers. The latter, impatient to<br />

join their companions, aband<strong>one</strong>d then* tower and machines,<br />

which they could no longer move. They planted ladders<br />

and swords, by the means of which they mounted the rampart,<br />

whither they were preceded by the count of Thoulouse,<br />

^Raymond Pelet, the bishop of Bira, the count de Die, and<br />

William de Sabran. Nothing now could stop their progress<br />

they dispersed the Saracens, who with their emir had taken<br />

refuge in the fortress of David,t and soon all the Crusaders<br />

united in Jerusalem embraced, wept for joy, and gave all<br />

their attention to the completion of their victory.<br />

Despair, however, for a moment forced the bravest of the<br />

Saracens to rally, and they charged with impetuosity the<br />

* The details of this assault are repeated by all contemporary historians ;<br />

several describe it at length. Foulcher de Chartres, who without doubt<br />

distingmshed himself there, is the <strong>one</strong> who says the least. Anna Comnena<br />

says that the Christians took Jerusalem in fifteen days, but gives no<br />

details.<br />

t The Oriental authors give no details of the siege of Jerusalem. The<br />

manuscript history of Jerusalem and Hebron, which is in the Imperial<br />

Library, and of which M. Jourdain has been kind enough to translate<br />

several fragments for me, contains nothing but vague notices. The author<br />

contents himself with saying that the siege lasted more than forty days,<br />

and that the Christians killed a great number of Mussulmans. We may<br />

here make a general remark : when the Mussulmans experience reverses,<br />

the Arabian authors are very sparing of details, and satisfy themselves<br />

with telling things in a vague manner, adding, " So God has willed it,<br />

may God curse the Christiatis." Aboul-Feda gives very few more details<br />

than the rest. He says that the massacre of the Mussulmans lasted<br />

during seven consecutive f'ays, and that seventy thousand persons were<br />

killed in the mosque of Ouiar, which is evidently an exaggeration.<br />

;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!