06-bioresourcesstatu.. - M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation
06-bioresourcesstatu.. - M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation
06-bioresourcesstatu.. - M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Bhitarkanika<br />
Table19:CensusoflivestockinKendraparadistrictfor<br />
1991& 2001.<br />
Livestock 1991 2001<br />
Male Female Tolal Total<br />
Caltle Crossbreed 6830 9460<br />
Indigenous 229630 237494 483414 471101<br />
Buitalo 3091 19470 22561 16000<br />
Sheep 22236 36235 58471 40805<br />
Goat 34<strong>06</strong>6 62941 97007 110244<br />
Pigs 899 1180 2079 --<br />
Poultry Fowls 470287 -- --<br />
Ducks 15268 485555 159614<br />
Source: Statistical Handbook 199~Directorate 01 Animal<br />
Rusbsodlu:r and veterinary SerJl"fce~ Cuttack and Dlst.<br />
Animal Hushandary and veterinary O/Dec? Kendrapara.<br />
#J)islrfct Veterinary O//lce? Kendrapara<br />
The table above shows the population of various<br />
categories of livestock in the Kendrapara district.<br />
The information pertaining to the six panchayats<br />
was not available. An attempt needs to be mad r to<br />
provide for fodder alternatives and ensure that<br />
these alternatives are sustainable. I<br />
c. Plantations : ,<br />
After a major cyclone in 1971, a casuaJina<br />
plantation project was implemented along jthe<br />
Gahirmata beach, to prevent sea erosion. Tnese<br />
coastline plantations were found detrimental to<br />
turtle nesting and hence were discontinued. I<br />
Irrigation department have constructed saline<br />
embankments to limit the damage done by fldods<br />
nearly everywhere in the sanctuary area. T~ese<br />
embankments used to breach very often andl an<br />
attempt to strengthen them through plantatipns<br />
has been taken up under the Eco-development<br />
plan of the Sanctuary Authorities. These avehue<br />
plantations along the boundaries of the villa,ges<br />
and the Sanctuary are done using Eucalyptus,<br />
Casurina, Acacia nilotica, Acabia<br />
auriculiformes and Azadiricta indica. I<br />
establishment of wood lots, rejuvenation of<br />
degraded mangroves, trials in pisciculture and<br />
horticulture, building safe bathing ghats and deep<br />
tube wells and schools, establishing basket making<br />
centers, strengthening local paths and tracks and<br />
developing eco-tourism centers an a few areas in<br />
the sanctuary.<br />
There are a few articles and manuals on nursery<br />
techniques and experiments to increase the<br />
growth rate of mangroves from the Bhitarkanika<br />
area (Kanvinde, 1995, Rao et al 1998, Eganathan<br />
et al 2000, Eganathan and Rao ?001 and Thatoi et<br />
al 1999,2000and 2001).<br />
There are no commercial plantations<br />
(horticultural or timber etc) within and in the<br />
vicinity of the Bhitarkanika area.<br />
VI. Threats to the Bio-Resource<br />
I. NaturaVenvironmental<br />
The area is unique due to the high tidal amplitude<br />
and ample fresh water from the rivers that flush<br />
out the salt form the soil. Periodic cyclones have<br />
damaged crops and villages. In fact as a result of<br />
cyclonic storms, the affected people have been<br />
rehabilitated on mangrove lands, causing a lot of<br />
forest to be cut down.<br />
Table20:Croparea(ha.)lossduetofloodingin2001<br />
Crop type<br />
Paddy submerged<br />
Non-paddy submerged<br />
Kendrapara<br />
55,571<br />
5,848<br />
Rajnagar<br />
1759<br />
129<br />
Source : Olstrict Agriculture Olljce~ Kendrapara<br />
A good monsoon or heavy rains have now become<br />
a threat, since most of the area is encroached and<br />
there are bunds that prevent free flow of the<br />
flooding waters. As a result, some of the bunds<br />
breach and cause flooding in the cropland.<br />
Apart from these, degraded mangrove areas :are<br />
also being rejuvenated. The species of choice iare<br />
Pests specially sheath rot, stem borer and brown<br />
spot are the major pests that cause a loss to the<br />
Rhizophora apiculata, Ceriops decandra, agriculture production.<br />
Bru.guiera cylindrica and Sonneratia apetdla.<br />
During the year 2000-2001,a total area of 277ha. ii. Anthropogenic<br />
was covered by mangrove plantations and ithe The main threat to the resources of Bhitarkanika<br />
area for April to Sept 2001 has been 303 1 ha. is unsustainable, illegal extraction. Fishing is<br />
(Nayak,2001).A component of the eco-development prohibited, yet the locals are seen fishing. Timber<br />
~~anm~ntgrh~::n~~~:;;i~~~ p:;~~e tt~:ek::~~fil~~; and fuel wood collection is prohibited, yet the<br />
recently constructed huts are made of mangrove<br />
development to the local people. The eco- wood. The cattle and other livestock use<br />
development plan is being applied in 12 vill~ges mangroves and associate species as fodder, when<br />
and the other activities under the plan are Ithe<br />
. 190