16.06.2013 Views

06-bioresourcesstatu.. - M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation

06-bioresourcesstatu.. - M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation

06-bioresourcesstatu.. - M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Gulf of Kachchh<br />

Kachchh. Ninety-one species of Pelecypods<br />

belonging to 27 families have been described from<br />

the Gulf of Kachchh \\ith a note on their relative<br />

abundance (Kundu, 1965). Moses (1938) has<br />

reported that there were 10 rich beds of the<br />

windowpane oysters between Balapur Bay and<br />

Pindara Bay of Gulf of Kachchh. Economic<br />

significance of the windowpane oyster fisheries<br />

along the gulf coast has been re-assessed by<br />

Verghese (1976). Gokhale et at. (1954) have<br />

reported growth rate of pearl oyster Pinctada<br />

pinctada in the Gulf of Kachchh. Various aspects<br />

. of the pearl fisheries in Gulf of Kachchh have been<br />

described by Eswaran et at. (1969).<br />

During the ICMAM data collection in February-<br />

March 1999 along coastal regions of the Gulf total<br />

group observed varied from 5 to 10. The groups<br />

were polychaetes, amphipods, decapods, molluscs,<br />

echinoderms, crustaceans, gorgonians, corals and<br />

bryozoans.<br />

c. Corals:<br />

Genetic diversity of the scleractinian corals<br />

occurring around the Poshitra point and the niche<br />

differentiation of various reef-building corals have<br />

been studies by Patel (1978).Various possibilities of<br />

establishing coral based industries in Gujarat and<br />

their potential to generate employment were<br />

discussed by Patel & Bhaskaran (1978).<br />

Satellite imageries indicated that the total reef<br />

area in the Gulf was 217 km' in 1975, which<br />

decreased to 118 km'in 1985 and 123 km' in 1986<br />

with net loss of 94 km' or 43% of the coral cover.<br />

The satellite pictures show that the reefs that are<br />

interpreted as having died out between 1975 and<br />

1985 in fact lie buried under mud, proving<br />

conclusively that the important, if not the only,<br />

cause for coral damage is the heavy silt load<br />

(Bahuguna & Nayak, 1998; Bahuguna et at., 1998).<br />

Satellite imageries also clearly showed that the<br />

core area of the MNP coral reefs, which covered<br />

116km'in 1975,was reduced to 83 kID'in 1982 and<br />

53 km' in 1985. The Remote Sensing data<br />

supported by ground truth data collection<br />

revealed that between 1985 and 1991 a net<br />

improvement (from 53 to 85 km') in coral cover<br />

within the core area of the MNP has taken place<br />

(Bahuguna & Nayak, 1998). This happened mainly<br />

because of the imposition of the ban on coral sand<br />

extraction by the cement factory at Sikka. The<br />

reefs are generally restricted to areas exposed to<br />

the strong tidal currents and live corals are<br />

generally confined to the northern and western<br />

10<br />

sides of the islands. The diversity of coral species<br />

is the lowest of all Indian reefs. A total of 44<br />

species of Scleractinian corals (stony corals) and<br />

12 species of soft corals were reported in 1988<br />

(Pillai & Patel, 1988). The monograph on Biological<br />

Diversity of Gujarat listed 40 species and 23<br />

genera of stony corals, 3 species of soft corals and<br />

4 sea fans from the Gulf (Pilo et at., 1986). Most of<br />

these corals are hermatypes (reef forming) while<br />

only a few are ahermatypes.<br />

The subtidal observations, underwater<br />

photography and videography shows that live<br />

corals - both soft and hard, are abundantly<br />

present in the sub-tidal regions of the reefs at<br />

various stages of growth. The genera Favia,<br />

Favites, Goniopora, Montipora, Turbinaria and<br />

the broken branches of Acropora. The soft corals<br />

genera are Dendronephythya and Nephthya.<br />

Stony corals dominate most of the reef area.<br />

d. Fisheries :<br />

Gujarat tops the list of the 9 littoral states of India<br />

in marine fish production accounting for 23.1% of<br />

the National total. In 1997-98 the State exported<br />

17.9%of its marine catch, which was 32.5% of the<br />

National export. Value-wise Gujarat earned 13.6%<br />

(Rs. 637.85 crores) of the Country's marine<br />

products export earning (Rs. 4,697.48 crores)<br />

(Fisheries Statistics, 2000).<br />

The Gulf of Kachchh and Arabian sea areas of<br />

Kachchh district supports a good fishery of<br />

commercially important species. The coastal<br />

centres along the Arabian Sea and the Kori Creek<br />

had a fish landing of 50,193 tons which was<br />

around 70% of the catch for Kachchh district<br />

during 1997~98.The three districts bordering the<br />

Gulf together landed 1,28,653tons during the same<br />

year, which was 18.3% of the State total 7,02,355<br />

tons. It can be obvious from the above that the Gulf<br />

proper accounts for 60% of total landings from the<br />

northern waters of Gujarat (Fisheries Statistics,<br />

2000). It is not clear what is the actual fish<br />

production from the Gulf, as the landings consist of<br />

even catches from outside the Gulf.<br />

It has been stated earlier that the state has<br />

reached the maximum sustainable yield (MSY)for<br />

fishing in the coastal belt upto a water depth of 75<br />

meters (Fisheries Statistics, 2000). The present<br />

trend indicates an intensification of fishing, which<br />

may, eventually, lead to overfishing of the stock.<br />

Fish with less commercial value, like Bombay<br />

Duck, Ribbon fish, small Sciaenids and<br />

miscellaneous fish, constituted over 70% of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!