06-bioresourcesstatu.. - M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation
06-bioresourcesstatu.. - M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation
06-bioresourcesstatu.. - M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Environmental wardens and Wildlife wardens<br />
have been appointed in each of the inhabited<br />
islands. They have been given scuba diving<br />
training. Their duty is to see that no coral shingle<br />
collection takes place and the islanders do not fish<br />
endangered marine animals. In 1999 one chief<br />
conservator of forests has been allotted a post in<br />
the Administration of Lakshadweep to develop a<br />
management plan for the coral reefs of<br />
Lakshadweep.<br />
Tourism. With regard to tourism the following<br />
statement has been made "the negative impact of<br />
tourism, generation of sewage, waste, increased<br />
consumption of water and change in landscape<br />
etc. An extremely low volume, high value added<br />
very specialized tourism therefore would be<br />
appropriate to make tourism environmentally<br />
sustainable." A regular system to educate tourists<br />
of prohibitions under CZMP and environmental<br />
laws regarding corals may be introduced<br />
(Srivastava, et al. 1997).<br />
VIII. Future Prospects<br />
Clearly the Lakshadweep Administration is very<br />
concerned with environmental protection. More<br />
laws and recommendations have been passed in<br />
Lakshadweep than almost anywhere else and it<br />
would seem as if they have all the pollution<br />
causing threats under control.<br />
The reality is something quite different. Every kind<br />
of reef and fish collection goes on despite the ban<br />
and notification. The Islanders appear to be sick<br />
and tired of bans. They feel alienated from the<br />
very resources that they have used Jrom time<br />
immemorial. They are quick to seize any<br />
opportunity to disregard the bans since<br />
implementation is non-existent and at the best<br />
very weak. There is one environment warden for<br />
each. island who is in charge of issuing license to<br />
allow a limited .quantity of shingle collection. He<br />
has the additional powers to issue notices and fine<br />
offenders. Field observations show that it is<br />
impossible for this single environment warden to<br />
work effectively and hence they turn a blind eye to<br />
the collections or report them as old collections.<br />
As a result no one is convinced about the value of<br />
the bans and tend to ignore them.<br />
The local people are n'lt taken into confidence<br />
and their consensus has not been sought before<br />
125<br />
Lakshadweep Islands<br />
issuing the bans. Attitude of the people is that<br />
since it is the government who is issues the ban;<br />
let them protect the reef and all the species<br />
included in the ban. At the same time some<br />
Islanders state that the local administration is not<br />
serious about implementing the bans. In the case<br />
of shingle, boulder and sand the notifications have<br />
lead to increased collection and hoarding by<br />
certain individuals.<br />
Complete quantitative and qualitative information<br />
on local, ecological, social, economic and political<br />
context are lacking from the site. Such<br />
information is essential to prepare a plan that<br />
integrates conservation and local economic<br />
development. This information is also essential to<br />
logically convince the local people about the<br />
gravity of the situation.<br />
Islanders are literate and hence can be educated<br />
on the importance of coral reefs. They are already<br />
aware that they owe their existence to reef<br />
building corals. Through integrated conservation<br />
and management approaches the livelihood<br />
security of resident populations could be greatly<br />
enhanced. In order for timely detection of<br />
anomalies and threats, information can be<br />
collected by monitoring resources and pollution.<br />
Two things are urgently needed:<br />
The first step towards protecting this site would be<br />
to undertake a study on the dependence of the<br />
local communities on the services and resources<br />
provided by the site. With such basic information<br />
available from grassroots, a people friendly,<br />
conservation, monitoring and development plan<br />
could be achieved with the participation of the<br />
Island Administration and the Islanders.<br />
Consensus building: through continuous public<br />
meetings and awareness campaigns involving all<br />
professions, age, and gender groups. We must take<br />
a island stakeholders participatory approach for:<br />
a) assessing resources, b) fixing levels of<br />
exploitation; c) imposing size regulatiou, d)<br />
periodic closure during breeding season of<br />
sensitive species to permit recovery and e)<br />
establishing Zoning - demarcation of areas for<br />
different uses including one undisturbed core area<br />
near every island. The role of the environment<br />
warden could be changed from policeman to<br />
consensus builder and provider of information.