06-bioresourcesstatu.. - M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation
06-bioresourcesstatu.. - M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation
06-bioresourcesstatu.. - M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Evaluating the annual landing trends of different<br />
zones studies by Kurup et at. (1993) indicates<br />
downstream sectors - Thanneermukkam barriers<br />
to Cochin were the most lucrative sector. Highest<br />
catch was from zone 1 and it started declining<br />
from zone 2. However, the rate of decline in the<br />
catches between zone 2 and 4 and also between 5<br />
and 6 was very sharp. Fishery of zone 6 showed<br />
more resemblance to zone 8 than to zone 5. The<br />
drastic ecological changes (Kurup et al., 1989)<br />
encountered in zone 6 and the adjoining<br />
downstream areas due to man made changes can<br />
be taken as the reason for the observed depletion<br />
of the resources.<br />
Post larval recruitment into brackish water<br />
environment can be considered as a causative<br />
factor in bringing about the fluctuations in the<br />
prawn yield (Blaxter, 1962). Natural immigration<br />
of the penaeid prawn larvae into Vembanad Lake<br />
during high alien periods have been reported and<br />
certainly the environment at the lake offers a<br />
better refuge as a nursery than the marine<br />
habitat. In recent years 16,000 ha were reclaimed<br />
from the lake (Anon, 1988). The salinity of the<br />
estuary has also presently decreased. Prior to the<br />
construction of the barrier, salinity incursion was<br />
noticed upto Pulinkizh, about 90 Km away from<br />
Cochin and salinity upstream reached upto 23 ppt<br />
in Kumarakom - Muhamma region (Josanto, 1971).<br />
However, in the present condition, the salinity of<br />
the region did not go beyond 6 ppt. Similarly in the<br />
downstream region from the salinity barrier, in<br />
zone 6 salinity did not go beyond 10 ppt (Kurup et<br />
al., 1980) against 22 - 26 ppt (Josanto, 1971).This<br />
. may be either due to Periyar diversions into<br />
Muvatupuzha or commissioning of the Edamalayar<br />
Hydroelectic Project. Thus a reduction of nursery<br />
area has affected the production of penaeid<br />
larvae.<br />
d. Salinity tolerance<br />
The Post larvae, which arrive in the lake, can<br />
tolerate a wide range of salinity (Kuttyamma,<br />
1975) and hence invade the best feeding grounds<br />
even those with moderate salinity values, for rapid<br />
growih. As they grow bigger in size, they become<br />
more sensitive to low salinity and hence are forced<br />
to descend into more favourable downstream<br />
areas. The maximum growth rate of penaeid<br />
prawns. is also associated with optimum saline<br />
.conditions (Kuttyamma, 1975). The shrinkage of<br />
nursery grounds may have resulted in over<br />
crowding of juveniles in the lower reaches viz:<br />
Vembanad Lake<br />
zone 1 and 2. These areas where the shrimp<br />
juveniles become concentrated are subjected to<br />
heavy fishing pressure due to indiscriminate<br />
operation of stake nets. The incidences of size<br />
growth over fishing are very much discernible in<br />
case of M. dobsoni.<br />
Prior to construction of the barrier, the fishery ill<br />
the upstream region was also sustained by<br />
Penaeus indicus, P.monodon, Mctapenaeus<br />
dobsoni, M. monoceros, Mugil cephalus, Liza<br />
macrolepis, Chanos chanos etc. But after the<br />
construction of barrier, very little catch is<br />
obtained from the southern part. Some of the<br />
freshwater fishes like Horabagrus brachysoma ,<br />
Clarias batrachus, and Ompak bimaculatus are<br />
on the wane and need protection and artificial<br />
propagation. The production of Etroplus<br />
suratansis however has increased especially from<br />
zone 8 during December - May when the barrier<br />
remained closed. The stagnant oligohaline<br />
conditions prevalent in the upstream regions of<br />
the lake may be very congenial for the survival of<br />
this species.<br />
95<br />
e. Depletion of resources :<br />
It is obvious that salt-water exclusion project is<br />
responsible for the remarkable difference in the<br />
yield pattern in the up stream and down stream<br />
regions of the lake. Further, the depletion of the<br />
resources in the up stream is not adequately<br />
compensated either by natural propagation of<br />
freshwater species or by ranching using fast<br />
growing freshwater fishes like the carps.<br />
f. Variation in fishing intensity and gears<br />
and their catch in Vembanad Lake:<br />
The fishing methods employed for exploitation of<br />
fin fishes and crustaceans of lake has been<br />
described by Gopinath (1953), Shetty (1965),<br />
Kurien and Sebastian (1982) and Kurup and<br />
Sammuel (1985) and Kurup et al. (1993). The<br />
fishing methods of the lake can be classified into<br />
seven categories namely stake nets, dip nets, gill<br />
nets, seine nets, cast nets lines and indigenous<br />
methods.<br />
Out of the stake nets studied and recorded, only a<br />
small percentage was found to be operative in the<br />
upstream (southern) region. Nearly 90% of the<br />
stake nets have cod end mesh size of 13 mm and<br />
about 47% have these below 8mm. They are not in<br />
the operation during monsoon season. With the<br />
building up of barrier, the intensity of tidal