16.06.2013 Views

06-bioresourcesstatu.. - M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation

06-bioresourcesstatu.. - M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation

06-bioresourcesstatu.. - M. S. Swaminathan Research Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Evaluating the annual landing trends of different<br />

zones studies by Kurup et at. (1993) indicates<br />

downstream sectors - Thanneermukkam barriers<br />

to Cochin were the most lucrative sector. Highest<br />

catch was from zone 1 and it started declining<br />

from zone 2. However, the rate of decline in the<br />

catches between zone 2 and 4 and also between 5<br />

and 6 was very sharp. Fishery of zone 6 showed<br />

more resemblance to zone 8 than to zone 5. The<br />

drastic ecological changes (Kurup et al., 1989)<br />

encountered in zone 6 and the adjoining<br />

downstream areas due to man made changes can<br />

be taken as the reason for the observed depletion<br />

of the resources.<br />

Post larval recruitment into brackish water<br />

environment can be considered as a causative<br />

factor in bringing about the fluctuations in the<br />

prawn yield (Blaxter, 1962). Natural immigration<br />

of the penaeid prawn larvae into Vembanad Lake<br />

during high alien periods have been reported and<br />

certainly the environment at the lake offers a<br />

better refuge as a nursery than the marine<br />

habitat. In recent years 16,000 ha were reclaimed<br />

from the lake (Anon, 1988). The salinity of the<br />

estuary has also presently decreased. Prior to the<br />

construction of the barrier, salinity incursion was<br />

noticed upto Pulinkizh, about 90 Km away from<br />

Cochin and salinity upstream reached upto 23 ppt<br />

in Kumarakom - Muhamma region (Josanto, 1971).<br />

However, in the present condition, the salinity of<br />

the region did not go beyond 6 ppt. Similarly in the<br />

downstream region from the salinity barrier, in<br />

zone 6 salinity did not go beyond 10 ppt (Kurup et<br />

al., 1980) against 22 - 26 ppt (Josanto, 1971).This<br />

. may be either due to Periyar diversions into<br />

Muvatupuzha or commissioning of the Edamalayar<br />

Hydroelectic Project. Thus a reduction of nursery<br />

area has affected the production of penaeid<br />

larvae.<br />

d. Salinity tolerance<br />

The Post larvae, which arrive in the lake, can<br />

tolerate a wide range of salinity (Kuttyamma,<br />

1975) and hence invade the best feeding grounds<br />

even those with moderate salinity values, for rapid<br />

growih. As they grow bigger in size, they become<br />

more sensitive to low salinity and hence are forced<br />

to descend into more favourable downstream<br />

areas. The maximum growth rate of penaeid<br />

prawns. is also associated with optimum saline<br />

.conditions (Kuttyamma, 1975). The shrinkage of<br />

nursery grounds may have resulted in over<br />

crowding of juveniles in the lower reaches viz:<br />

Vembanad Lake<br />

zone 1 and 2. These areas where the shrimp<br />

juveniles become concentrated are subjected to<br />

heavy fishing pressure due to indiscriminate<br />

operation of stake nets. The incidences of size<br />

growth over fishing are very much discernible in<br />

case of M. dobsoni.<br />

Prior to construction of the barrier, the fishery ill<br />

the upstream region was also sustained by<br />

Penaeus indicus, P.monodon, Mctapenaeus<br />

dobsoni, M. monoceros, Mugil cephalus, Liza<br />

macrolepis, Chanos chanos etc. But after the<br />

construction of barrier, very little catch is<br />

obtained from the southern part. Some of the<br />

freshwater fishes like Horabagrus brachysoma ,<br />

Clarias batrachus, and Ompak bimaculatus are<br />

on the wane and need protection and artificial<br />

propagation. The production of Etroplus<br />

suratansis however has increased especially from<br />

zone 8 during December - May when the barrier<br />

remained closed. The stagnant oligohaline<br />

conditions prevalent in the upstream regions of<br />

the lake may be very congenial for the survival of<br />

this species.<br />

95<br />

e. Depletion of resources :<br />

It is obvious that salt-water exclusion project is<br />

responsible for the remarkable difference in the<br />

yield pattern in the up stream and down stream<br />

regions of the lake. Further, the depletion of the<br />

resources in the up stream is not adequately<br />

compensated either by natural propagation of<br />

freshwater species or by ranching using fast<br />

growing freshwater fishes like the carps.<br />

f. Variation in fishing intensity and gears<br />

and their catch in Vembanad Lake:<br />

The fishing methods employed for exploitation of<br />

fin fishes and crustaceans of lake has been<br />

described by Gopinath (1953), Shetty (1965),<br />

Kurien and Sebastian (1982) and Kurup and<br />

Sammuel (1985) and Kurup et al. (1993). The<br />

fishing methods of the lake can be classified into<br />

seven categories namely stake nets, dip nets, gill<br />

nets, seine nets, cast nets lines and indigenous<br />

methods.<br />

Out of the stake nets studied and recorded, only a<br />

small percentage was found to be operative in the<br />

upstream (southern) region. Nearly 90% of the<br />

stake nets have cod end mesh size of 13 mm and<br />

about 47% have these below 8mm. They are not in<br />

the operation during monsoon season. With the<br />

building up of barrier, the intensity of tidal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!