Black Genesis: The Prehistoric Origins of Ancient Egypt
Black Genesis: The Prehistoric Origins of Ancient Egypt
Black Genesis: The Prehistoric Origins of Ancient Egypt
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Egypt</strong>ians or who built the pyramids, Hawass has issued some rather odd statements. For example, when, in 2002, a<br />
small robot was used to explore narrow shafts in the Great Pyramid <strong>of</strong> Giza, he told a bemused journalist <strong>of</strong> the popular<br />
Al-Gomhoreya newspaper: “<strong>The</strong> results <strong>of</strong> the robot’s exploration refute the allegations reiterated by Jews and some<br />
Western countries that the Jews built the pyramids!” 38<br />
Hawass’s superior, <strong>Egypt</strong>’s Minister <strong>of</strong> Culture Farouk Hosni, made a very similar bizarre statement: “Israeli<br />
allegations that they built the Pyramids abound, and we must face up to this even if it triggers a crisis with Israel! This is<br />
piracy! Our history and our civilization must be respected but the Israelis want to take over everything! We must<br />
counterattack with full strength because this is how they took Palestine. <strong>The</strong>y keep on saying Palestine belongs to them<br />
and now they are doing the same with the Pyramids!” 39 Further, Hawass added to this: “A group <strong>of</strong> people are making an<br />
organized campaign. <strong>The</strong>re are some people pushing them [Israel]. . . . <strong>The</strong>se people are waging a big attack against us. I<br />
swore two years ago that I would not reveal their names, but I found out that I must mention them because it is becoming<br />
a threat . . . there is among us a bad person, a Jew . . . and I will tell the public that everyone who tries to talk against the<br />
<strong>Egypt</strong>ians should shut their mouths!” 40<br />
According to Hawass, a member <strong>of</strong> the group allegedly waging a “big attack” backed by Israel against the <strong>Egypt</strong>ians<br />
is Robert Bauval. Bauval is a Christian, not a Jew, and, ironically, he was born and raised in <strong>Egypt</strong>. *40<br />
In a more recent television interview in February 2009, Hawass unabashedly claimed that the Jews “control the<br />
entire world” and that “. . . for eighteen centuries they [the Jews] were dispersed throughout the world . . . they went to<br />
America and took control <strong>of</strong> its economy . . . they have a plan: Although they are few in number, they control the entire<br />
world . . . look at the control they have over America and the media!” 42<br />
Needless to say, with this type <strong>of</strong> display by the chief <strong>of</strong> the SCA, any claim, however scientific and scholarly, <strong>of</strong> a<br />
<strong>Black</strong> African origin for <strong>Egypt</strong>’s ancient civilization will inevitably be met with indifference and, more likely, with<br />
opposition. Indeed, Hawass has already made this quite clear with his latest commentaries on this issue to the <strong>of</strong>ficial<br />
<strong>Egypt</strong>ian MENA News Agency: “. . . the portrayal <strong>of</strong> ancient <strong>Egypt</strong>ian civilization as black has no element <strong>of</strong> truth to it!<br />
<strong>Egypt</strong>ians are not Arabs and are not Africans despite the fact that <strong>Egypt</strong> is in Africa . . . !” 43<br />
According to this kind <strong>of</strong> logic, though <strong>Egypt</strong> is in Africa, <strong>Egypt</strong>ians are not Africans. Such blatant contradiction<br />
most likely stems from the fact that Hawass probably equates Africans and <strong>Black</strong>s. <strong>The</strong>refore, any connection between the<br />
ancient <strong>Egypt</strong>ians and <strong>Black</strong>s or Africans must be rejected at all cost, even if it contradicts geographical realities. Perhaps<br />
this extreme view clarifies other, less blatant but still puzzling attacks that scholars have made in their academic<br />
publishing. Facts, however, are facts: <strong>Egypt</strong> is in Africa, <strong>Egypt</strong>ians are Africans, and there is now overwhelming evidence<br />
that ancient <strong>Egypt</strong>ians have a <strong>Black</strong> African origin.<br />
Rejection <strong>of</strong> an Article<br />
In early 2008, Thomas Brophy, together with another coauthor, submitted to an academic journal a paper about a small<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the proposed astronomy <strong>of</strong> Nabta Playa. <strong>The</strong> journal returned it with a critical review from an anonymous referee<br />
(perhaps from an <strong>Egypt</strong>ian scholar) who, in the course <strong>of</strong> recommending that the journal reject the paper, actually<br />
referred to Brophy and his colleagues as “behaving like arrogant Westerners.” We were puzzled by that strange<br />
comment. Why, we thought, would an accomplished scholar make such a personal attack within the formal review<br />
process? It seemed out <strong>of</strong> context. <strong>The</strong>n it dawned on us: perhaps he was speaking from a perspective formed partly<br />
by a racially hierarchical worldview. If this was true, it would be natural for him to have a sort <strong>of</strong> chip on his shoulder about<br />
Westerners. In Brophy’s paper, as far as we were thinking at the time, we were simply proposing a solution to an<br />
astronomy puzzle. He and his colleagues made no mention <strong>of</strong> or concerned themselves with any contemporary racialcultural<br />
implications <strong>of</strong> their paper. Yet we now understand why those innocent suggestions about astronomy at Nabta<br />
Playa may have been perceived as a threat.<br />
At this point, we must state categorically that we are not trying to steal the pyramids, we are not claiming to have<br />
built the pyramids, and we are not claiming that our friends and family—or even our ethnic group—built them. We say<br />
this with tongue in cheek, <strong>of</strong> course—hoping that the SCA director will make room for some humor and a broader