15.06.2013 Views

Black Genesis: The Prehistoric Origins of Ancient Egypt

Black Genesis: The Prehistoric Origins of Ancient Egypt

Black Genesis: The Prehistoric Origins of Ancient Egypt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

May 11, 2001, vol. 292, no. 5519, pp. 1151–53). Interestingly, statistical genealogical studies separate from genetics<br />

indicate that the most recent common ancestor <strong>of</strong> all people alive today was much more recent than Mitochondrial Eve,<br />

and Y-Chromosomal Adam, probably within the past few thousand years (e.g., Douglas L. T. Rohde, Steve Olson, and<br />

Joseph T. Chang, “Modelling the recent common ancestry <strong>of</strong> all living humans,” Nature, 30 Sept. 2004, vol. 431, pp.<br />

562–65). Such a more recent common ancestor is consistent with the 200,000 year ago Mitochondrial Eve who was the<br />

most recent unbroken matrilineal ancestor.<br />

In one <strong>of</strong> the BBC episodes, the presenter, Alice Roberts, who is also a lecturer in anatomy at the University <strong>of</strong><br />

Bristol, explains that a “complex-looking DNA-based ‘family tree’ shows how twenty-firstcentury Europeans,<br />

Australians and the rest can all be traced back to the same black African population.” 13 Roberts further explains, with<br />

refreshing candor, that “‘population’ . . . is the word we should be using instead <strong>of</strong> ‘race.’ I wouldn’t use the word ‘race.’<br />

Biologically, it doesn’t make sense. It’s a bizarre mismatch <strong>of</strong> concepts: culture, history. . . . Genetically, a white<br />

Scandinavian and someone from sub-Saharan Africa are very similar. In fact, humans have less variation genetically than<br />

chimpanzees. It makes you realize that all the historical attitudes towards different races are scientifically<br />

meaningless.” 14<br />

<strong>The</strong> genetic evidence, bolstered by more recent refinements, 15 lends support to the Out <strong>of</strong> Africa Eve hypotheses for<br />

human migration, as opposed to the Multi-Regional hypothesis. In a book accompanying the BBC show, Roberts cites<br />

the work <strong>of</strong> the Oxford pr<strong>of</strong>essor Stephen Oppenheimer, who describes the Out <strong>of</strong> Africa Eve story <strong>of</strong> humankind as<br />

going something like this:<br />

Homo Sapiens, modern humans, lived ca. 160,000 BC with the earliest mt-DNA and Y-chromosome ancestors<br />

found in East Africa. Four groups <strong>of</strong> hunter-gatherers travelled out southwest towards the Congo and west to the<br />

Ivory Coast, south towards the Cape <strong>of</strong> Good Hope, and northeast towards the Nile. Around 125,000 BC one group<br />

moved northwards down the Nile and into the Levant, but due to a climatic upheaval around 90,000 BC this group<br />

died out. A global freeze turned the Levant and North Africa into extreme desert. Around 85,000 BC another group<br />

crossed the entrance <strong>of</strong> the Red Sea in the south and into the Arabian Peninsula to reach the Indian sub-continent.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y then spread to Indonesia and reached southern China by 75,000 BC. By ca. 65,000 BC they had spread to<br />

Borneo and Australia. Warmer climatic condition around 50,000 BC allowed a group to move again northwards<br />

through the Levant, cross the Bosporus and reach Europe. By 25,000 BC the ancestors <strong>of</strong> the Native Americans<br />

crossed the Bearing land bridge into Alaska and then spread into North America. By 10,500 BC they had spread also<br />

into South America. Between 10,000 and 8,000 years ago the Levant group moved back into the now-green<br />

Sahara. 16<br />

We can note that what remains to be explained is anomalous evidence for the later parts <strong>of</strong> that story, such as the fact<br />

that archaeological evidence for dating the earliest South Americans keeps moving back in time, which indicates that they<br />

may have crossed the oceans by boats, for example. In addition, Roberts’s story is a mixture <strong>of</strong> the genetic,<br />

archaeological, and anthropological evidences, all <strong>of</strong> which are subject to new results and improvements. Yet some<br />

version <strong>of</strong> the basic Out-<strong>of</strong>-Africa-Eve view—that all humans alive today share one female ancestor from Africa who<br />

lived roughly two hundred thousand years ago—is the currently prevailing notion among scientists. It is possible, then,<br />

that while this human journey was going on, the early modern humans <strong>of</strong> east Africa moved northward into Chad and<br />

settled in the Tibesti-Ennedi highlands. From there, perhaps around 9000 BCE, they started moving north again into the<br />

then inviting, green <strong>Egypt</strong>ian Sahara, probably going first to the Gilf Kebir and Uwainat mountain region, then slowly<br />

spreading east and northeast toward the Nile. Another group moved westward from central Africa into the green Tenere<br />

Sahara <strong>of</strong> Niger as well as into the fertile Aïr Mountains farther west. It is possible that around 8000 BCE these blackskinned<br />

people in the <strong>Egypt</strong>ian Sahara encountered an incoming Mediterranean group that had returned to North Africa<br />

from Europe via the Levant. This may perhaps explain why Romuald Schild and Fred Wendorf <strong>of</strong> the CPE found in the<br />

skeletal remains at the prehistoric cemetery <strong>of</strong> Gebel Ramlah near Nabta Playa two racial groups, one made up <strong>of</strong> sub-<br />

Saharan <strong>Black</strong> pastoralists and the other <strong>of</strong> Mediterranean or North African ethnology. 17 <strong>The</strong>n, starting around 5000<br />

BCE, as the Sahara became drier, these people began moving out <strong>of</strong> the desertified regions. Finally, by 3500 BCE, the<br />

desert became superarid and forced them to migrate eastward into the Nile Valley. If this is true—and it does very much<br />

appear to be the case—then the origins <strong>of</strong> the ancient <strong>Egypt</strong>ians are rooted in a black-skinned race <strong>of</strong> sub-Saharan

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!