Black Genesis: The Prehistoric Origins of Ancient Egypt
Black Genesis: The Prehistoric Origins of Ancient Egypt
Black Genesis: The Prehistoric Origins of Ancient Egypt
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
also note that several megalithic alignments emanating from CSA mark both the rising <strong>of</strong> Sirius and the Big Dipper—and<br />
the ancient <strong>Egypt</strong>ians <strong>of</strong>ten identified the former with a cow and the latter with a bull’s thigh. Indeed the possibility <strong>of</strong> a<br />
cultural link between the cow stone at Nabta Playa and the ancient <strong>Egypt</strong>ians was suggested by Wendorf when he<br />
proposed that this strange, sculpted megalith “may have been the origin <strong>of</strong> the ancient <strong>Egypt</strong>ians’ fascination with<br />
working large stones.” 20 Many questions regarding this cow stone remain unanswered. How was the top surface so finely<br />
polished? How were the fine, sharp, and precise curvilinear edges made? What tools could have been used by ancient<br />
people who lived before the age <strong>of</strong> metal? Unfortunately these questions may never be answered, for the cow stone was<br />
removed from Nabta Playa by the <strong>Egypt</strong>ian antiquities authorities and today lies broken in the backyard storage area <strong>of</strong><br />
the Nubian Museum in Aswan (see appendix 3). We can also recall that the cow stone itself was placed on top <strong>of</strong> another<br />
sculpture that was cut into the living bedrock <strong>of</strong> the site. This bedrock sculpture has the shape <strong>of</strong> a large, smooth disk that<br />
is about 3.5 meters (11.5 feet) across, with some <strong>of</strong> its parts and its edges carved by human hands. According to Wendorf<br />
and Krolik,<br />
<strong>The</strong> north and west sides had been carefully shaped by removing one or two large sections that left a curved outline,<br />
following an arched bedding plane in the bedrock. <strong>The</strong> large sections removed during the shaping <strong>of</strong> the tablerock<br />
were most probably reused as the two large slabs placed in the center <strong>of</strong> the surface architecture. <strong>The</strong> top <strong>of</strong> the<br />
tablerock was flat and smoothed. It is possible this was natural smoothing . . . but this seems unlikely since none <strong>of</strong><br />
the other table-rocks visible at the sourthern end <strong>of</strong> the Nabta Basin display similar smoothed surfaces. . . .<br />
Regardless <strong>of</strong> how the top was smoothed, the sides were clearly pecked and had a slightly re-curved outline. 21<br />
Surrounding this bedrock sculpture is a great mystery that has not been adequately investigated. How and why was it<br />
sculpted—and, more intriguingly, when was it fashioned? Wendorf initially proposed that it was created during the Late<br />
Neolithic—that is, around 5100 BCE, after the playa sediments were formed. 22 Yet if so, we may wonder how the<br />
ancient people <strong>of</strong> Nabta Playa could have known where this outcrop in the bedrock was located if they could not see it,<br />
for it was totally covered by a thick layer <strong>of</strong> sediment. Wendorf and Krolik had no explanation. According to them,<br />
however, the ancient people somehow knew where this outcrop was and thus dug through the sediment to expose it. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
then sculpted it, covered it with sediment, placed the cow stone above it, covered the cow stone with more sediment, and<br />
finally arranged the megalithic architecture on the surface.<br />
This seems quite implausible, and perhaps there is a simpler explanation: the bedrock sculpture long predates the<br />
Late Neolithic given by Wendorf. 23 How old is the bedrock sculpture, who built it, and why was it built? What could<br />
have been its true meaning? Clearly it was important enough to be made the centerpiece <strong>of</strong> the Nabta Playa ceremonial<br />
complex when the Late Neolithic people placed the cow stone over it thousands <strong>of</strong> years later. Unfortunately we could<br />
not investigate this matter further, for the sediment has been dumped back into the hole, and, as we have learned, some <strong>of</strong><br />
the surface megaliths have been removed and taken to the Nubian Museum in Aswan while others have been moved on<br />
site, scattered randomly (see appendix 3). Whatever might be the solution to the unsolved mystery that lies behind the<br />
multilayered and pangeneration construction <strong>of</strong> the CSA, it is sure to fit into a very elegant astronomical scheme. *29<br />
We must also remember that Complex Structure A, although the largest at Nabta Playa, is but one <strong>of</strong> thirty complex<br />
structures in the southwest part <strong>of</strong> the site. Only two <strong>of</strong> these structures, CSA and another, CSB, were fully excavated.<br />
<strong>The</strong> bedrock under CSB was also sculpted, but into a different shape described as an inclined oval disc; there was no<br />
embedded sculpture above it. A third complex structure was also partially excavated, and two more complex structures<br />
had holes drilled into their sediment, confirming the presence <strong>of</strong> bedrock outcrops. This led Wendorf and his team to<br />
conclude that all the complex structures seen on top <strong>of</strong> the sediments probably contain a sculpted bedrock outcrop<br />
covered by 3 or 4 meters (10 or 13 feet) <strong>of</strong> sediment.<br />
What could have driven the ancient people <strong>of</strong> Nabta Playa to sculpt all these outcrops <strong>of</strong> bedrock? Perhaps more<br />
intriguingly, when these outcrops were completely covered by sediment carried and compacted by wind and rainfall<br />
thousands <strong>of</strong> years later, how could they have been rediscovered by the people who built the megalith arrangements on<br />
the surface? Or, were they not rediscovered by the Late Neolithic people? Perhaps, instead, they were maintained over<br />
thousands <strong>of</strong> years by an even more ancient culture about which we know almost nothing.<br />
Let us not forget, as well, the most provocative question that surrounds these mysterious complex structures. When<br />
the CPE, led by Wendorf, started excavations at Nabta Playa in the 1970s, they very much hoped that the many complex<br />
structures and tumuli were tombs that contained human remains <strong>of</strong> high-ranking individuals or even kings. Instead