Black Genesis: The Prehistoric Origins of Ancient Egypt
Black Genesis: The Prehistoric Origins of Ancient Egypt
Black Genesis: The Prehistoric Origins of Ancient Egypt
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
deep desert beyond the oasis <strong>of</strong> Dakhla. He therefore concluded that Kharga was the land <strong>of</strong> Yam and that Dakhla was the<br />
land <strong>of</strong> the Timhiu (Libyans). But this is clearly incorrect, for we have already seen that if this was the case, Harkhuf ’s<br />
boast that it took only seven months to go to Yam and return does not make sense. Yet going farther due west does not<br />
make much sense either, because this direction would have taken Harkhuf directly into the Great Sand Sea, a formidable<br />
barrage <strong>of</strong> high dunes that even today cannot be crossed without specially equipped four-wheel-drive vehicles.<br />
So which direction did Harkhuf take? <strong>The</strong> phrase “western corner <strong>of</strong> the sky” gives us a clue. <strong>The</strong> ancient <strong>Egypt</strong>ians<br />
saw the sky as being held up by four pillars at each corner. In addition, at the time <strong>of</strong> Harkhuf, they defined the horizon as<br />
having two parts: east and west. <strong>The</strong> “western corner <strong>of</strong> the sky,” therefore, implies the southwest corner—and it leads<br />
toward Gilf Kebir and, beyond it, to the Tibesti highlands in Chad. As we have seen, however, such a journey is not<br />
possible without adequate sources <strong>of</strong> water along the way, and no such water sources, either on the way or at Gilf Kebir<br />
itself, existed. <strong>The</strong> first available water is 200 kilometers south <strong>of</strong> Gilf Kebir, at Jebel Uwainat. Interestingly, though, in a<br />
1965 article by G. W. Murray, the director <strong>of</strong> the topographical survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>Egypt</strong>, Murray explains that he examined the<br />
inscriptions <strong>of</strong> Harkhuf, and he suggests: “<strong>The</strong> Land <strong>of</strong> Temeh [Timhiu/Libyans] was an <strong>Egypt</strong>ian expression for the<br />
inhabited parts <strong>of</strong> the southern Libyan desert. <strong>The</strong>y were widely scattered . . . [I]n the far south-west, the sandstone massif<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Gilf Kebir made up, to borrow a phrase from the Chief <strong>of</strong> Yam, ‘the western corners <strong>of</strong> heaven. . . .’” 19<br />
Bearing this in mind, we can note another intriguing term found in the letter written to Harkhuf by the young King<br />
Pepi II. In this letter, Pepi II refers to Yam as ta-akhet-iu, which <strong>Egypt</strong>ologists translate as “land <strong>of</strong> the horizon<br />
dwellers.” In hieroglyphs it is written thus:<br />
“Land <strong>of</strong> the horizon dwellers” implies that Yam was a very distant place—so distant that its people were deemed to<br />
live in the horizon. <strong>The</strong> historian A. J. Arkell even suggested that Yam was as far in the southwest as Darfur in the<br />
Sudan. 20 Where exactly was Yam, however, and who or what were the mysterious horizon dwellers?<br />
We know with absolute certainty that, millennia before Harkhuf went to Yam, the southwest corner <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Egypt</strong>ian<br />
Sahara either was inhabited or visited regularly by a <strong>Black</strong> people as attested by the rock art found at Gilf Kebir and Jebel<br />
Uwainat. Since 2003 we have known that these <strong>Black</strong> people were also in the Nabta Playa region, thanks to the CPE’s<br />
discovery <strong>of</strong> a prehistoric cemetery only 20 kilometers (about 12 miles) from Nabta Playa near a large sand dune called<br />
Jebel Ramlah.<br />
[T]he anthropological and forensic analysis] . . . show that two different populations—Mediterranean and sub-<br />
Saharan—co-existed here [at Gebel Ramlah near Nabta Playa] . . . [T]he people who inhabited the shores <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Gebel Ramlah lake were not cut <strong>of</strong>f from the rest <strong>of</strong> the world. <strong>The</strong>ir contacts sometimes stretched very far, as is<br />
evidenced by unearthed objects made <strong>of</strong> raw materials that were not to be found in the vicinity, and must have been<br />
brought in from outside. <strong>The</strong> best example <strong>of</strong> such long-distance imports is a nose plug made <strong>of</strong> turquoise, the<br />
closest sources <strong>of</strong> which are located 1000 km. to the north on the Sinai Peninsula. Shells were brought in either<br />
from the Nile, 100 km. away, or from the Red Sea much further to the east. . . . Ivory was brought from the south,<br />
since elephants, which belonged among the Ethiopian fauna, could not survive in such dry savanna. . . . <strong>The</strong> typical<br />
beliefs <strong>of</strong> the ancient <strong>Egypt</strong>ians [to preserve the body so that the spirit could rest in peace in the afterworld] may<br />
indeed have originated with the Neolithic peoples inhabiting the ever-drier savannah in what is today the Western<br />
Desert, only centuries prior to the emergence <strong>of</strong> ancient <strong>Egypt</strong>. In the basin <strong>of</strong> the dried-up Nabta Playa lake, located<br />
only 20 km. away, the same people who left behind the graveyards at the foot <strong>of</strong> Gebel Ramlah, erected gigantic<br />
clusters <strong>of</strong> stelae, extending over many kilometers. . . . Perhaps it was indeed these [prehistoric] people who<br />
provided the crucial stimulus towards the emergence <strong>of</strong> state organization in ancient <strong>Egypt</strong>. 21<br />
Here, at the foot <strong>of</strong> the dune, the CPE found three burial areas that contained human skeletons <strong>of</strong> sixty-seven<br />
individuals dated to six thousand years ago. According to Fred Wendorf and Romuald Schild <strong>of</strong> the CPE, “physical<br />
anthropology <strong>of</strong> rare skeletal remains . . . suggests racial association <strong>of</strong> the populations with the Sub-Saharan or <strong>Black</strong><br />
groups.” 22 In many burials, the bones <strong>of</strong> several individuals were placed together, thrown pell-mell, as if they had been<br />
brought to the grave in bags. This suggested to the anthropologists that the individuals may have died elsewhere in the