Archaeology and nature: hyblean cultural landscape and territorial ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Fig. 1: Greek time, a. satellite image, b. the reconstruction hypothesis by Paget, b. overlap Paget hypothesis\present 2. A communication strategy to improve public enjoyment The translation of scientific data into popular data is one of the problem that we have to address to correctly define a communication project. The aim is to understand the meaning of the archaeological finds, to reconstruct the archaeological landscape and the relationship with the existing landscape. The spread of archaeological knowledge is very important for citizens, first users of cultural heritage. To have awareness of the role, that citizens can play in conservation and valorisation of the territory where they live, it can be more powerful than any law to preserve the archaeological heritage. From a methodological point of view the stages that characterize a communication project designed to increase the value of archaeological heritage are: analysis of the sources, data acquisition in archaeological sites with different technology, data processing and the definition of the communication project. We are more interested in the theoretical framework for defining the communication project than to the problem related to the acquisition methods and data processing. Message can generally be decomposed into two components content and media and to develop an effective communication project it is very important to know the information you have to send (content); only in this way you are able to operate the simplification necessary to provide an accurate information and to select the appropriate media (form of communication). In our case the content to transmit is the story of a place, Cumae, transformed over the time from nature and human actions. The selected media to transmit information is digital media an the recipient of a communication project is a non-specialist audience, so it is necessary to submit all disclosures to help them to decode the "sign" are still present. 1121
Fig. 2: Roman time, overlap Paget hypothesis to present look We think the "virtual rebuilding" can help to understand the meaning of archaeological finds and the most important problem is to define what to rebuilt, how to represent the reconstruction and what technology to use. The archaeological finds are generally only a "piece of matter" and to reduce the communication gap we can reconstruct what is missing. The use of digital media and 3D modelling opens new perspectives in archaeological research, it let us to document the passage of the history, but it raises new questions about the ways of representing the archaeological heritage[3]. The use of 3D models to represent hypotheses of reconstruction is a powerful tool that promotes communication and dissemination of cultural content to a wide audience. The 3D models allow us: - to access to monuments at risk of damage, and therefore closed to the public; - to document what the history has erased; - to create new way of enjoyment of archaeological heritage without boundaries, in a virtual space; - to obtain a dynamic view, from different points of view in space and time; - to build an information system where we can access to data collected; - to organize a database linked to the models and to territory[4]. In this field there are some different issues to deal and some needs to fulfil: - we have to solve the problem of the credibility and validity of reconstruction models of object, monuments, sites or landscapes partially o totally modified or destroyed, and virtually reconstructed based on archaeological interpretation; - we have to define a communication code to show the traces of philological work in 3D model to show elements corresponding to reality from hypothesis; - we have to chose what kind of representation to use: structural or hyperrealistic - we have to design the interface for an interactive use of the models. A problem often overlooked is the difficulty that the end user meets by using technological tools. Sometimes, we used very complex systems and the interface isn't user friendly and it is very difficult to understand for those who are not familiar with technology. In fact, we aren't willing to spend our own time to learn how to use a tool that is only a means to acquire further knowledge. Moreover, a user, who feels inferior, backward or inadequate respect to the proposed product, irritates and he renounces to use cultural product. Therefore, the interfaces must be designed with particular regard to the users, by ensuring their intuitiveness and limiting as possible the technology interference. 3. The rule of representation To define a communication strategy for enjoyment of Archaeological Heritage it's very important to work in a multi-field team of experts made up of architects, archaeologists, computer specialists and communication. experts. 1122
Page 1 and 2: Archaeology and nature: hyblean cul
Page 3 and 4: 2. Kaukana project: territorial reg
Page 5 and 6: The main goal of the planning inter
Page 7 and 8: The Time of Flight 3d laser scanner
Page 9 and 10: Fig. 12-13: The archaeological land
Page 11 and 12: Industrial heritage, collective ide
Page 13 and 14: vertical reduction of market prices
Page 15 and 16: Fig. 3: The mining site of Grottaca
Page 17 and 18: Fig. 5: Laser scan 3D of the Pozzo
Page 19 and 20: Fig. 6: Palazzo Pennisi. meanings,
Page 21 and 22: Le tanneries di Barjols: uno spazio
Page 23 and 24: Fig. 2 - Piano del quartiere delle
Page 25 and 26: Fig. 4 - Sviluppo verticale anni ci
Page 27 and 28: Riferimenti bibliografici [1] AA.VV
Page 29 and 30: to compact settlements, in which th
Page 31 and 32: Fig. 4: Maiori, plan 1848. Fig. 5:
Page 33 and 34: Fig. 8: Furore,Conca dei Marini and
Page 35 and 36: Fig. 10: Positano. 4. The mountain
Page 37 and 38: which the driving force derived fro
Page 39: The urban development of the lower
Page 43 and 44: Fig. 4: 3D model, a. Greek time, b.
Page 45 and 46: Fig. 6: Acropolis of Cuma Overlappi
Page 47 and 48: We think that 3D PDF could be an us
Page 49 and 50: having an infrastructure in a certa
Page 51 and 52: Cana le Pic. 3 Territorial context
Page 53 and 54: Shape: 1. Bridge dimensions and sha
Page 55 and 56: AUGÉ Marc. Nonluoghi - introduzion
Page 57 and 58: productive landscape design restric
Page 59 and 60: Tehran’s outskirt Fig.4, 5: Agric
Page 61 and 62: Appropriate interaction among urban
Page 63 and 64: Allotment garden: is designed for t
Page 65 and 66: 5. Conclusion Restoration of biodiv
Page 67 and 68: irrepressible expression of a cultu
Page 69 and 70: The competition titled Pylons of th
Page 71 and 72: Fig. 9: An iconographic repertory o
Page 73 and 74: Camillo Sitte meets Robert Venturi
Page 75 and 76: Fig. 1: Berlin southern beltway at
Page 77 and 78: The design of sustainability in rel
Page 79 and 80: To safeguard fertile, dynamic and a
Page 81 and 82: “The loss of place, asserts Chris
Page 83 and 84: 3. Sustainable morphology as integr
Page 85 and 86: In truth, we are witnessing today -
Page 87 and 88: Recognizing Cultural Heritage for S
Page 89 and 90: emember our past. The relationship
Page 91 and 92:
State’s social offer (health, edu
Page 93 and 94:
Besides, the achievements of this u
Page 95 and 96:
evident the impact the park had on
show all

Archaeology and nature: hyblean cultural landscape and territorial ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?