15.06.2013 Views

Underground Rivers - University of New Mexico

Underground Rivers - University of New Mexico

Underground Rivers - University of New Mexico

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case 3: Gravitation plus 17.1 rotation/day<br />

centrifugal force<br />

Chapter 14 -- Hollow Earth Geophysics<br />

DRAFT 1122//66//22001122<br />

Case 4: 17.1 rotation/day centrifugal force<br />

alone<br />

Case 3 spins our earth 17.1 times/day -- a "day" by our current timepiece, that is, not the solar<br />

day in the faster-rotating world -- the ω required for centrifugal acceleration at the equator to be<br />

9.81 meters/second 2 , counterbalancing the inward gravitational force. Could we do this, objects<br />

would weight nothing at the equator. At the poles, however, gravity would be unopposed and<br />

they'd weigh the weights to which we're accustomed.<br />

Case 4 is Teed's model, that <strong>of</strong> a hollow earth with centrifugal force pushing us against the shell's<br />

inside. What physics tells us -- though it may not be what we expect -- is that there's no<br />

gravitational attraction between a shell <strong>of</strong> any thickness and an object within. There is no<br />

gravitational pull whatsoever on objects within this world; there's just the centrifugal push that the<br />

rotation exerts.<br />

To make Teed's world function like the one we see, we need this centrifugal force to equal the<br />

gravitational force with which we are familiar. At a ω <strong>of</strong> 17.1 rotations/day, an object dropped at<br />

the interior world's equator travels straight toward the surface, accelerating at 9.81 meters/<br />

second 2 , exactly as Teed would want.<br />

At higher latitude, however, r is smaller. As centrifugal force is reduced, an object falls toward the<br />

shell more slowly than does an object dropped at the equator. Moreover, the path <strong>of</strong> descent is<br />

inclined to what the locals would call "down."<br />

At the poles where there's no centrifugal force, objects in Teed's world don't fall. While few <strong>of</strong> us<br />

have been to either pole, we're quite certain that a dropped glove falls to the snow.<br />

In Case 5, a miniature sun at the sphere's<br />

center exerts a thin ring <strong>of</strong> inward gravitational<br />

pull. An object loosened at the poles would<br />

obey the small sun's gravity and lift away from<br />

the shell's inner surface. Rotating the interior<br />

sun about a sister changes nothing but the<br />

gravitational magnitude. Add a pair <strong>of</strong> internal<br />

moons and we're approaching Seaborn's<br />

universe, but we're not helping our case.<br />

Our conclusion: Centrifugal force cannot<br />

simultaneously maintain the same centrifugal<br />

force at every point on the shell, what's needed<br />

for falling objects to behave the same,<br />

independent <strong>of</strong> latitude.<br />

Case 5: Gravitation plus 17.1 rotation/day<br />

centrifugal force<br />

Uppddaatteess aatt hhttttpp::////www. .uunnm. .eedduu//~rrhheeggggeenn//UnnddeerrggrroouunnddRi ivveerrss. .hhttml l<br />

149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!