15.06.2013 Views

Underground Rivers - University of New Mexico

Underground Rivers - University of New Mexico

Underground Rivers - University of New Mexico

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 12 -- Superterranean Metrics<br />

Dalton attributed the discrepancy to overestimated evaporation and non-representativeness<br />

locations.<br />

Upon the whole then I think that we can finally conclude that the rain and dew <strong>of</strong> this country<br />

are equivalent to the quantity <strong>of</strong> water carried <strong>of</strong>f by evaporation and by the rivers. And as<br />

nature acts upon general laws, we ought to infer, that it must be the case in every other country<br />

until the contrary is proved.<br />

Dalton's finding is a prime example <strong>of</strong> Ockham's Razor, Chapter 10. When choosing between<br />

conflicting, but incompatible, explanations, the simper <strong>of</strong> the explanations is more likely to be the<br />

better. Dalton's finding calls upon but four quantifiable hydrologic estimates, no unseen routes or<br />

mechanisms and no unique physical relationships.<br />

We should not close this chapter secure that science has triumphed, however. Skepticism is too<br />

much a part <strong>of</strong> human nature. Nearly a century later, the German geologist Otto Volger (1822-<br />

1897) in The Scientific Solution to the Water Issue with Respect to the Supply <strong>of</strong> Cities (1877)<br />

categorically denied any relation between rainfall and groundwater. Volger also maintained that<br />

concern for groundwater contamination was a fear <strong>of</strong> phantoms which would impose unnecessary<br />

costs on public water wells.<br />

We began this chapter with a list <strong>of</strong> fallacious hydrological propositions commonly held until the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong>ton.<br />

1. Mechanisms such as wind, capillary action or wave action can draw large quantities <strong>of</strong> water<br />

from the earth’s interior.<br />

2. Sea water can lose its salt by infiltrating through soil.<br />

3. Rainfall is insufficient to account for all water discharged by rivers.<br />

4. Rainfall can not infiltrate into the ground in large quantities.<br />

Rudimentary measurements disprove all four.<br />

An ocean-to-mountain underground river becomes unnecessary when rainfall exceeds<br />

streamflow. It seems, therefore -- if we allow ourselves a bit <strong>of</strong> reflection -- that Chapters 8-10<br />

was spent looking for engines that need not exist.<br />

The fifth perception, however, yet eluded testing.<br />

5. The earth contains a large network <strong>of</strong> caverns and rivers.<br />

Eliminating hydrologic necessity for underground rivers does not dispel the possibility <strong>of</strong> their<br />

existence.<br />

Did quantifying the hydrologic cycle remove underground rivers from theological interest?<br />

Not at all. As we will see in the next chapter, it confirmed Christianity.<br />

DRAFT 1122//66//22001122<br />

Uppddaatteess aatt hhttttpp::////www. .uunnm. .eedduu//~rrhheeggggeenn//UnnddeerrggrroouunnddRi ivveerrss. .hhttml l<br />

129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!