15.06.2013 Views

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

From locative to durative to focalized?<br />

The English progressive and ‘PROG<br />

imperfective drift’ 1<br />

Kristin Killie<br />

Faculty of Humanities, University of Tromsoe<br />

In <strong>the</strong> present paper I test <strong>the</strong> claim of Bertinetto et al. (2000) that <strong>the</strong> English<br />

progressive has undergone ‘PROG imperfective drift’, originating as a locative<br />

construction, to develop into a durative progressive and subsequently also into a<br />

focalized progressive. I argue that it is doubtful whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> English progressive<br />

has evolved along <strong>the</strong>se lines. While <strong>the</strong> construction has clearly become much<br />

more focalized, and less durative, <strong>the</strong>re is no evidence of a predominantly<br />

durative stage. Instead, <strong>the</strong> English progressive shows a variety of functions all<br />

through <strong>the</strong> period under study, and <strong>the</strong> durative type is not among <strong>the</strong> most<br />

frequent types in any one period. As for origins, <strong>the</strong> many meanings or functions<br />

of <strong>the</strong> progressive in <strong>the</strong> earliest records may seem to suggest multiple origins<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than a single, locative source.<br />

1. Aims and organization<br />

Although a large number of monographs and articles have been written on <strong>the</strong><br />

history of <strong>the</strong> English progressive, <strong>the</strong> problems surrounding its origins and<br />

semantic development remain unsolved. As for origins, a number of hypo<strong>the</strong>ses<br />

have been proposed. Poppe (2003: 16) sums up <strong>the</strong> status quo in <strong>the</strong> following<br />

manner:<br />

Historical linguists seem to have reached no definitive agreement on <strong>the</strong> origin of <strong>the</strong><br />

English progressive, i.e., on <strong>the</strong> construction which formed <strong>the</strong> basis for Modern<br />

English ‘be’ plus V-ing. The main candidates are Old English ‘wesan/beon’<br />

plus present participle in -ende, or Old/Middle English ‘be’ plus preposition (later<br />

reduced > a > zero) plus a nominal form in -ing/-ung, or possibly a blend of <strong>the</strong><br />

two constructions, with or without fur<strong>the</strong>r external (Latin, French and Brythonic<br />

Celtic) influences.<br />

1. I thank Åsta Haukås, Tore Nesset, and Toril Swan for reading and commenting on an early<br />

draft of this paper. I also thank two anonymous readers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!