15.06.2013 Views

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Old English copula weorðan<br />

and its replacement in Middle English<br />

Peter Petré<br />

Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders & University of Leuven<br />

Hubert Cuyckens<br />

University of Leuven<br />

With <strong>the</strong> aid of a specially compiled corpus, this paper accounts for <strong>the</strong><br />

replacement – mainly by become – of weorðan ‘become’, whose use rapidly<br />

decreased in Middle English. Drawing on Goldbergian construction grammar,<br />

<strong>the</strong> paper posits <strong>the</strong> existence of a lexeme-independent network of copular<br />

constructions [Copula + np/ap/…]. Copular uses of weorðan are associated<br />

with this network, but also form part of a second network exclusive to weorðan,<br />

which, already in Old English, served as a model for <strong>the</strong> extension of becuman<br />

to copular uses. In early Middle English, weorðan reacted to changes in <strong>the</strong><br />

lexeme-independent copular network. Weorðan was no longer used with<br />

adjectival participles when <strong>the</strong>se were constructionally separated <strong>from</strong> its most<br />

frequent collocates, namely human propensity adjectives. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, reacting<br />

to an influx of various adjectives in predicate position, becuman, which had no<br />

collocational preferences, extended its use to <strong>the</strong>se adjectives and eventually took<br />

over <strong>from</strong> weorðan completely.<br />

The focus of this paper is on <strong>the</strong> use of two verbs in copula-constructions. The first<br />

of <strong>the</strong>se verbs is obsolete in Present-day English (PDE); it still occurs as worth in<br />

<strong>the</strong> nineteenth-century idiom woe worth <strong>the</strong>e. In Old English (OE), its infinitive<br />

is usually spelt (ge)weorðan, and in Middle English (ME) (i)wor<strong>the</strong>n. The second<br />

verb is PDE become (OE becuman, ME bikomen), which, in early ME, is one of<br />

<strong>the</strong> two main verbs that replaced weorðan in most of its contexts (<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r verb<br />

is PDE wax, OE weaxan, ME waxen). Because <strong>the</strong> emphasis in this paper is on <strong>the</strong><br />

OE period, we will <strong>from</strong> now on refer to <strong>the</strong>se verbs in <strong>the</strong>ir OE forms of weorðan<br />

and becuman. In addition, our main interest will be in <strong>the</strong> construction types<br />

. In <strong>the</strong> present paper, <strong>the</strong> prefixless verb weorðan and <strong>the</strong> prefixed verb geweorðan are treated<br />

as a single lexeme. While this is a simplification, <strong>the</strong> functions of <strong>the</strong>se two verbs are sufficiently<br />

similar to justify a global discussion of <strong>the</strong>m.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!