15.06.2013 Views

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Subjective progressives in 7th and 8th century English 1<br />

understood to be an aspectual marker which views <strong>the</strong> situation expressed by <strong>the</strong><br />

predicate as having begun and not yet finished at topic time. 9 Progressive aspect<br />

is understood as a specific subtype of this general imperfective category which<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r qualifies <strong>the</strong> situation as being viewed dynamically, i.e., as in progress<br />

(cf. Bybee, Perkins & Pagliuca 994: 26f.). Ano<strong>the</strong>r controversial aspect of this<br />

topic which, as it is not <strong>the</strong> focus of <strong>the</strong> present paper, I will only briefly touch<br />

upon in this context are <strong>the</strong> particular progressive + perfect effects (such as<br />

absence of result, focus on concomitant effects, cf. König 995: 62f.). 20 These<br />

meanings should be understood as being pragmatically ra<strong>the</strong>r than semantically<br />

determined, that is, as being induceable <strong>from</strong> <strong>the</strong> combination of <strong>the</strong> meanings of<br />

progressive and perfect where, however, <strong>the</strong> context only can offer clues about <strong>the</strong><br />

actuation of one of <strong>the</strong> possible meanings. For <strong>the</strong> present purpose, I have grouped<br />

all of <strong>the</strong>se pragmatic effects toge<strong>the</strong>r. The important criterion for this chapter is<br />

only whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> progressive carries its aspectual meaning (which it clearly does<br />

when <strong>the</strong> product of <strong>the</strong> combination with <strong>the</strong> perfect are such effects as absence<br />

of result, cf. König 995: 63) or whe<strong>the</strong>r its function is ra<strong>the</strong>r subjective, as it is in<br />

<strong>the</strong> following example of an interpretative progressive in <strong>the</strong> perfect:<br />

( ) <strong>the</strong> Insect stood upon <strong>the</strong> inwards bulbous Part, and beat upon <strong>the</strong> outward Coat,<br />

as if it had been working it off as it went (archer\ 700–49.bre\ 724fair.s2 5 )<br />

Quite similar to ( 0), this sentence in <strong>the</strong> past perfect progressive offers a more<br />

speaker-based view of <strong>the</strong> event described neutrally in <strong>the</strong> preceding sentence, using<br />

a comparison, while none of <strong>the</strong> typical effects of <strong>the</strong> combination of perfect<br />

and progressive in aspectual use – such as focus on duration, focus on recency, concomitant<br />

effects and absence of result – can be observed. In contrast, <strong>the</strong> following<br />

example can be classified as an objective/aspectual use of a perfect progressive:<br />

( 2) I was call’d out to see it [an odd apparition in <strong>the</strong> sky], by <strong>the</strong> Servants, who had<br />

been looking at it about half a quarter of an Hour<br />

(archer\ 700–49.bre\ 720perc.s2)<br />

Here, we have <strong>the</strong> typical focus on duration, made explicit by <strong>the</strong> adverbial (about<br />

half a quarter of an hour), and fur<strong>the</strong>rmore <strong>the</strong> situation described by <strong>the</strong> predicate<br />

is ei<strong>the</strong>r still in progress at topic time or only recently stopped.<br />

1 . The term topic time goes back to Klein ( 994: 3) and refers to <strong>the</strong> time for which a claim is<br />

made about <strong>the</strong> situation expressed by <strong>the</strong> predicate.<br />

0. Understanding <strong>the</strong>se meanings as pragmatically determined is preferred here, since<br />

attempts to analyse <strong>the</strong> perfect progressive in a strict formal semantic framework do not seem to<br />

be able to account for all characteristics of actual use (cf. Klein 994 and <strong>the</strong> criticism provided<br />

by Lucko 994).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!