15.06.2013 Views

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

168 Bettelou Los<br />

c. Bill pushed Harry along (= along <strong>the</strong> trail)<br />

(Goldberg & Jackendoff 2004: 543)<br />

d. Wait Long by <strong>the</strong> River and <strong>the</strong> Bodies of Your Enemies Will Float By<br />

(= by one’s position; title of CD album by The Drones)<br />

This phenomenon could be interpreted as loss of argument structure, on a par<br />

with <strong>the</strong> loss of argument structure we observe in <strong>the</strong> grammaticalization of verbs<br />

into auxiliaries. There is, however, a caveat here in that prepositions may not have<br />

a syntactic argument at an earlier stage but were located in <strong>the</strong> specifier of an NP in<br />

<strong>the</strong> local cases (instrumental, ablative, locative). They developed into prepositions<br />

only later (Vincent 1999):<br />

(23) KP<br />

Spec K'<br />

K NP<br />

Spec<br />

adposition<br />

N<br />

N'<br />

Particles may well have split off <strong>from</strong> prepositions when <strong>the</strong> latter were still in<br />

<strong>the</strong> ‘adposition’ stage, and may never have had proper syntactic arguments – <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were associated with a particular NP by virtue of occupying its specifier position.<br />

Particles like down, out, off and up may have acquired <strong>the</strong>ir prepositional use only<br />

recently: down is originally a PP that grammaticalized to a head, while OE ut and<br />

up do not show clear prepositional uses but are usually followed by prepositional<br />

phrases. 6 What is clear is that <strong>the</strong> defocusing of <strong>the</strong> object allows <strong>the</strong> particle to be<br />

analysed as a Head ra<strong>the</strong>r than a Phrase, a typical grammaticalization effect.<br />

Because <strong>the</strong> syntactic status of some of <strong>the</strong>se NP complements of path-Ps is<br />

unclear, I will refer to this NP as <strong>the</strong> ground, a semantic ra<strong>the</strong>r than syntactic term,<br />

and to <strong>the</strong> object NP of <strong>the</strong> particle verb combination as <strong>the</strong> figure, following Svenonius<br />

(2003), after Talmy (1978). In a sentence like he took <strong>the</strong> ring off his finger,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n, <strong>the</strong> ring is <strong>the</strong> figure and his finger is <strong>the</strong> ground of <strong>the</strong> particle off.<br />

(25) he took <strong>the</strong> ring off his finger<br />

figure prt ground<br />

(24) PP<br />

Spec P'<br />

P<br />

preposition<br />

NP<br />

Spec N'<br />

6. Eg. in examples like Hi eodon up to þære dune (Num. 14: 40), He eode ut on ðæt land (Gen.<br />

24, 63). Ut and up in such phrases are ei<strong>the</strong>r adverbs in <strong>the</strong> spec of a PP or heads <strong>the</strong>mselves<br />

postmodified or complemented by a PP. See Elenbaas (2007) for a discussion.<br />

N

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!