Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang
Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang
Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Particles as grammaticalized complex predicates 159<br />
(3) a. break/blow/blast/cut/fling/push/rake/whisk open, cut/stop short, bleach<br />
white, blow/keep/make/sift clear, put straight, let/set free, think fit, cast/let/<br />
pry/shake/wrestle loose, strip naked etc.<br />
b. bring to light, put in execution, take in hand, call to mind, call in question,<br />
take into consideration etc.<br />
(4) carry aloft (< on loft), set alight (< on light), take apart (< on part), put awry<br />
(< on wry), carry around (< on round), keep asunder (< on sunder), set afoot<br />
(< on foot), etc.<br />
The arguments advanced against identifying particles as grammaticalized predicates<br />
focus on <strong>the</strong> failure of many particles (most notoriously up) to function as independent<br />
predicates (He phoned me up versus *I am up), <strong>the</strong> lack of telicity in many cases<br />
(though telicity would be expected if particles were grammaticalized predicates,<br />
which are as a rule resultative), and <strong>the</strong> failure of constituency tests and topicalization.<br />
I will argue in this chapter that <strong>the</strong>se same quirks are exhibited by predicates.<br />
Resultative complex predicates show various degrees of productivity, transparency<br />
and idiosyncrasy which mirror those of particle verbs, and easily acquire idiomatic<br />
meanings that only work in combination with specific verbs: cf. drink NP under <strong>the</strong><br />
table versus *he is under <strong>the</strong> table (Goldberg & Jackendoff 2004).<br />
If <strong>the</strong> similarity in behaviour of predicates and particles can be taken as a<br />
pointer to a shared diachronic origin, it is all <strong>the</strong> more interesting that clear signs<br />
of this affinity between <strong>the</strong> two do not emerge until EModE. The affinity can be<br />
traced into OE, but <strong>the</strong>n only with prefixes, which were still productive in that<br />
stage of <strong>the</strong> language, and not with particles.<br />
2. Particles and predicates<br />
2.1 Origin of particles<br />
Bolinger (1971: 18) provides this list of particles:<br />
(5) aback, about, above, across, after, again, aground, ahead, along, alongside, aloud,<br />
apart, around, aside, askew, astray, astride, atop, asunder, athwart, away, back,<br />
before, behind, below, between, by, down, forth, forward, home, in, off, on, out,<br />
over, past, round, through, to, toge<strong>the</strong>r, under, underground, underneath, up.<br />
The great majority represent grammaticalized (or better, lexicalized) prepositional<br />
phrases. 1 Underground is a clear example, but <strong>the</strong>re are many o<strong>the</strong>rs: away<br />
<strong>from</strong> onweg, down <strong>from</strong> adown > ofdune. O<strong>the</strong>rs are homophonous with PE<br />
1. For a discussion of <strong>the</strong> relationship between grammaticalization and lexicalization, see e.g.,<br />
Brinton (2002).