15.06.2013 Views

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Particles as grammaticalized complex predicates 159<br />

(3) a. break/blow/blast/cut/fling/push/rake/whisk open, cut/stop short, bleach<br />

white, blow/keep/make/sift clear, put straight, let/set free, think fit, cast/let/<br />

pry/shake/wrestle loose, strip naked etc.<br />

b. bring to light, put in execution, take in hand, call to mind, call in question,<br />

take into consideration etc.<br />

(4) carry aloft (< on loft), set alight (< on light), take apart (< on part), put awry<br />

(< on wry), carry around (< on round), keep asunder (< on sunder), set afoot<br />

(< on foot), etc.<br />

The arguments advanced against identifying particles as grammaticalized predicates<br />

focus on <strong>the</strong> failure of many particles (most notoriously up) to function as independent<br />

predicates (He phoned me up versus *I am up), <strong>the</strong> lack of telicity in many cases<br />

(though telicity would be expected if particles were grammaticalized predicates,<br />

which are as a rule resultative), and <strong>the</strong> failure of constituency tests and topicalization.<br />

I will argue in this chapter that <strong>the</strong>se same quirks are exhibited by predicates.<br />

Resultative complex predicates show various degrees of productivity, transparency<br />

and idiosyncrasy which mirror those of particle verbs, and easily acquire idiomatic<br />

meanings that only work in combination with specific verbs: cf. drink NP under <strong>the</strong><br />

table versus *he is under <strong>the</strong> table (Goldberg & Jackendoff 2004).<br />

If <strong>the</strong> similarity in behaviour of predicates and particles can be taken as a<br />

pointer to a shared diachronic origin, it is all <strong>the</strong> more interesting that clear signs<br />

of this affinity between <strong>the</strong> two do not emerge until EModE. The affinity can be<br />

traced into OE, but <strong>the</strong>n only with prefixes, which were still productive in that<br />

stage of <strong>the</strong> language, and not with particles.<br />

2. Particles and predicates<br />

2.1 Origin of particles<br />

Bolinger (1971: 18) provides this list of particles:<br />

(5) aback, about, above, across, after, again, aground, ahead, along, alongside, aloud,<br />

apart, around, aside, askew, astray, astride, atop, asunder, athwart, away, back,<br />

before, behind, below, between, by, down, forth, forward, home, in, off, on, out,<br />

over, past, round, through, to, toge<strong>the</strong>r, under, underground, underneath, up.<br />

The great majority represent grammaticalized (or better, lexicalized) prepositional<br />

phrases. 1 Underground is a clear example, but <strong>the</strong>re are many o<strong>the</strong>rs: away<br />

<strong>from</strong> onweg, down <strong>from</strong> adown > ofdune. O<strong>the</strong>rs are homophonous with PE<br />

1. For a discussion of <strong>the</strong> relationship between grammaticalization and lexicalization, see e.g.,<br />

Brinton (2002).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!