15.06.2013 Views

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Syntactic dialectal variation in Middle English 149<br />

invariantly (2 per cent). In sum, <strong>the</strong> situation found in late Old English is that of one<br />

clear favourite relativizer (invariable þe), a decline in <strong>the</strong> use of pronominal relativizers<br />

(se and seþe) and a very timid presence of invariable þat.<br />

Regarding <strong>the</strong> distribution of relativizers in early Middle English, Table 2 reveals<br />

that while invariable þe remains <strong>the</strong> favourite relativizer, it has undergone a significant<br />

reduction in frequency, compared to its position in late Old English, <strong>from</strong> 79 per cent<br />

to 66.2 per cent. By contrast, invariable þat, sparingly used in late Old English, shows<br />

a striking increase in frequency <strong>from</strong> late Old English to early Middle English <strong>from</strong><br />

2 per cent to 30 per cent. Pronominal relativizers decline sharply after Old English<br />

<strong>from</strong> 18.7 per cent to 3 per cent, almost verging on ‘danger of extinction’. Finally,<br />

<strong>the</strong> results <strong>from</strong> Table 3 also reveal <strong>the</strong> first appearance of a new set of pronominal<br />

relativizers in <strong>the</strong> English language, represented by wh-words as adnominal relativizers.<br />

This function was non-existent in late Old English, and still infrequent in this<br />

early period, but already present in <strong>the</strong> English language.<br />

Table 2. Distribution of relativizers in late Old (adapted <strong>from</strong> Suárez Gómez 2004: 216)<br />

and Middle English 8<br />

Late Old English Þe 526 (79.3%)<br />

Se and seþe 124 (18.7%)<br />

Þat 13 (2%)<br />

Total 663<br />

Early Middle English Þe 780 (66.2%)<br />

Þat 354 (30%)<br />

Se and seþe 36 (3%)<br />

Wh- 8 (0.8%)<br />

Total 1,178<br />

Table 3. Distribution of relativizers according to dialect in Middle English<br />

East-Midlands West-Midlands South Kent Total<br />

Þe 347 (226.8) 238 (74.7) 165 (128.9) 30 (51) 780<br />

Þat 57 (37.2) 265 (83.2) 26 (20.3) 6 (10.2) 354<br />

Se/seþe 2 (1.3) 10 (3.1) 13 (10.1) 11 (18.7) 36<br />

Wh- 4 (2.6) 4 (1.3) – – 8<br />

Total 410 517 204 47 1,178<br />

8. Zero relativizers have not been included in <strong>the</strong> analysis of relativizers because of <strong>the</strong> low<br />

number of examples. Only 8 instances of zero relative clauses have been found in <strong>the</strong> corpus<br />

under analysis.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!