15.06.2013 Views

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International ... - STIBA Malang

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Syntactic dialectal variation in Middle<br />

English 1<br />

Cristina Suárez-Gómez<br />

Universitat de les Illes Balears<br />

ME is widely known as “par excellence, <strong>the</strong> dialectal phase of English” (Strang<br />

1970: 224). It is <strong>the</strong>refore not at all surprising that <strong>the</strong> linguistic differences<br />

among dialects in ME have long attracted <strong>the</strong> attention of scholars. It is generally<br />

assumed that nor<strong>the</strong>rn dialects innovate mainly due to Scandinavian influence<br />

as opposed to sou<strong>the</strong>rn dialects, which maintain <strong>the</strong> tradition. The aim of my<br />

study is to test whe<strong>the</strong>r this tendency is also reflected in relativization, both in<br />

<strong>the</strong> system of relativizers used and in <strong>the</strong> position adopted by <strong>the</strong> relative clause.<br />

My study shows that <strong>the</strong> system of relativizers inherited <strong>from</strong> OE, with deictic<br />

relativizers, and <strong>the</strong> tendency towards extraposition typical of ME are associated<br />

with sou<strong>the</strong>rn dialects, while <strong>the</strong> North shows a simplified system of relativizers<br />

as well as a marked tendency for relative clauses to be intraposed. The data for<br />

<strong>the</strong> present study have been drawn <strong>from</strong> The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts:<br />

Diachronic and Dialectal.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The fact that research into English historical dialectology has focused almost<br />

exclusively on Middle English comes as no surprise given that Strang hailed<br />

this period as “par excellence, <strong>the</strong> dialectal phase of English” (1970: 224), and<br />

for Milroy it “exhibited <strong>the</strong> greatest diversity in written language of any period<br />

before or since” (1992: 156). Indeed, for Milroy “<strong>the</strong> label ‘Middle English’<br />

does not refer to a coherent entity, but to a complex series of divergent, rapidly<br />

changing and intertwining varieties restrospectively seen as transitional<br />

1. I am grateful to <strong>the</strong> Autonomous Government of Galicia (grant no. PGIDIT05PXIC20401PN),<br />

and <strong>the</strong> Spanish Ministry of Education and Science and <strong>the</strong> European Regional Development<br />

Fund (grant no. HUM2004–00940/FILO) for generous financial support. Thanks are also due to<br />

Prof Teresa Fanego, Dr Elena Seoane and Dr Belén Méndez for valuable comments on an earlier<br />

version of this chapter.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!